Systematic literature review: Examining a paradox—Will the increase in financial aid through free education overwhelmingly affect academic results? An exploratory investigation in selected public schools in the Copperbelt Province of Zambia

https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.1.77

Autores

Palavras-chave:

Academic Performance, Education Financing, Educational Equity, Educational Quality, Free Education Policy, Systematic Review, Zambia

Resumo

This systematic literature review combines research on free education in public schools in Copperbelt Province. It focuses on two main goals: improving financial support and academic outcomes. The review looks at trends in policy implementation, funding models, stakeholder views, and measurable learning results. To understand why increased funding may not overwhelmingly translate into improved academic results, this study is anchored in four complementary theoretical perspectives: human capital theory, systems theory, resource dependence theory, and institutional theory. Together, these frameworks provided an integrated lens for interpreting the dynamics between financial inputs and learner outcomes. Drawing from over 40 peer-reviewed sources, government reports, and regional assessments, the review highlights key facilitators, barriers, and strategies based on evidence to better balance cost accessibility and student performance in Copperbelt. The results show that while increased financial investments improve infrastructure, teaching resources, and enrollment numbers, the connection to academic performance is not always clear. Factors like teacher skill, overcrowded classrooms, student engagement, and management of resources significantly affect the success of financial support. Additionally, problems such as inefficient fund distribution, delays in providing resources, and weak monitoring systems lessen the potential benefits of free education programs. The review also points out differences among schools. Some use financial support effectively to boost teaching and learning outcomes, while others experience minimal progress due to systemic and administrative issues. Based on these findings, this study suggests a plan for targeted financial management that focuses on teacher training, timely delivery of educational resources, and routine performance assessments. Improving accountability for fund management and fostering community involvement in school governance are also important. Furthermore, adding strategies like remedial programs, digital learning tools, and student-centered teaching methods could significantly improve the effectiveness of financial support on academic results. Providing free education creates significant opportunities to enhance equity and access. However, realizing its full potential requires a thorough strategy that combines financial investment with effective teaching approaches, governance reforms, and tailored interventions. Future research should focus on long-term studies to explore the links between financial support systems and measurable improvements in student academic outcomes.

Dimensions

Africanews. (2024). Zambia's free schools lead to a surge in pupil numbers. https://www.africanews.com

Afrobarometer. (2023). Zambians applaud the government's performance on education and see the Free Education Policy as beneficial. https://afrobarometer.org/

Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226041223.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226041223.001.0001

Checkland, P. (1999). Systems thinking, systems practice. John Wiley & Sons.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198775331.003.0004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198775331.003.0004

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An introduction to systematic reviews. Sage.

Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404-1427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309343469 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309343469

Kabaso, O. (2025). Evaluating school leadership in material resources accountability in Zambian secondary schools. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(3S), 4510-4522.

https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0323 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0323

Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (Technical Report EBSE 2007-001). Keele University & Durham University Joint Report.

Machinyise, E., Kasebula, F., & Chabu, M. (2023). The impact of free education policy on the provision of quality education and access to tertiary education in Zambia: A case of selected schools and colleges of Livingstone District. Zambia Association of Public Universities and Colleges (ZAPUC) Conference Proceedings, 3(1), 124-134. https://ictjournal.icict.org.zm/index.php/zapuc/article/view/232

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/226550

Ministry of Education. (2021). Education statistical bulletin. Government of the Republic of Zambia.

Ministry of General Education. (2021). Free basic education policy implementation report. Government of the Republic of Zambia.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Open Medicine, 3(3), e123-e130.

https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/89.9.873 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/89.9.873

https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

https://doi.org/10.3736/jcim20090918 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3736/jcim20090918

Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x

Muyunda, G. (2022). Impact of principal instructional leadership practices on students' academic performance in Zambia. Education & Youth Research, 2(1), 24-36.

Muyunda, G., & Wanjuan, Z. (2023). School leadership in Zambia: A systematic literature review. Education & Youth Research, 3(2), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.59041/eyor.1340690 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59041/eyor.1340690

Nkosha, D., Masaiti, G., & Al, D. (2016). Zambia education policy review: Paving the way for SDG 4 - Education 2030 (Report No. ED-2016/WS/37). UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27798.98880

Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing.

https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.

Psacharopoulos, G., & Patrinos, H. A. (2018). Returns to investment in education: A decennial review of the global literature. Education Economics, 26(5), 445-458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2018.1484426 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2018.1484426

Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.172.0136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.172.0136

Sterne, J. A. C., Hernán, M. A., Reeves, B. C., Savović, J., Berkman, N. D., Viswanathan, M., Henry, D., Altman, D. G., Ansari, M. T., Boutron, I., Carpenter, J. R., Chan, A. W., Churchill, R., Deeks, J. J., Hróbjartsson, A., Kirkham, J., Jüni, P., Loke, Y. K., Pigott, T. D., … Higgins, J. P. T. (2016). ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ, 355, i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919

Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45

UNESCO. (2014). Teaching and learning: Achieving quality for all (EFA Global Monitoring Report 2013/4). UNESCO Publishing.

UNESCO. (2021). Global education monitoring report 2021: Inclusion and education. UNESCO Publishing.

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sdgs.un.org/goals

Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller.

World Bank. (2018). World development report 2018: Learning to realize education's promise. World Bank.

Publicado

2026-03-05

Como Citar

Sinkala, H., Kabaso, O., Kanyamuna, V., Simui, F., & Muleya, G. (2026). Systematic literature review: Examining a paradox—Will the increase in financial aid through free education overwhelmingly affect academic results? An exploratory investigation in selected public schools in the Copperbelt Province of Zambia. African Journal of Empirical Research, 7(1), 895–909. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.1.77

Edição

Secção

Articles

Artigos mais lidos do(s) mesmo(s) autor(es)