The access-quality paradox: Examining the disconnect between financial inputs and learning outcomes in Zambia’s free education policy
Keywords:
Access-Quality Paradox, Educational Financing, Free Education Policy, Policy Implementation, ZambiaAbstract
The implementation of Free Education Policies (FEPs) is a central strategy for achieving inclusive and equitable quality education (SDG 4) in low- and middle-income countries. However, the relationship between enhanced public funding and improved academic performance is often paradoxical. This mixed-methods study investigates this paradox within the Copperbelt Province of Zambia. Analyzing survey data from 228 stakeholders (teachers, administrators, learners, and union representatives) and integrating perspectives from key civil society organizations: Zambia National Education Coalition (ZANEC), Forum for African Women Educationalists of Zambia (FAWEZA), the Campaign for Female Education (CAMFED), and the National Action for Quality Education in Zambia (NAQEZ), the research reveals that while the policy has successfully boosted enrollment and access (evidenced by a 95% survey response rate), it has simultaneously strained the education system. Quantitative findings demonstrate critical infrastructural deficits (e.g., a mean score of 1.82 for classroom spaciousness) and inconsistent resource availability. Qualitative data highlight systemic bottlenecks: overcrowded classrooms, delayed fund disbursement, and overburdened teachers. Triangulated with stagnant national examination trends, the evidence indicates that financial inputs are insufficient to produce gains in academic performance without parallel investment in enabling conditions for quality. The study concludes that the Zambian case exemplifies a critical policy gap where investment in access has not been matched by investment in the enabling conditions for quality. We argue for a fundamental shift toward integrated policy frameworks that explicitly link funding to quality assurance metrics, infrastructure development, and systemic capacity building. Drawing on a systems-thinking lens, the study demonstrates that Zambia’s Free Education Policy has expanded access without commensurate gains in learning outcomes due to systemic capacity constraints across infrastructure, human resources, and school management. The findings advance theories on implementing education policy by showing that fee abolition alone is insufficient and that sustainable improvements require integrated, quality-oriented investments that align access with learning conditions.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2026 Henry Sinkala, Henry Sinkala, Oliver Kabaso, Vincent Kanyamuna, Francis Simui, Gistered Muleya

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- James Mwale, Vincent Kanyamuna Kanyamuna, John Moose, Francis Simui, The community lived experiences of sanitation in the peri-urban areas of Lusaka, Zambia , African Journal of Empirical Research: Vol. 6 No. 4 (2025): Oct-Dec 2025
- Francina N.S. Makondo, Christine Wamunyima Kanyengo, Francis Simui, Bridging the digital divide: Integrating information literacy instruction to empower distance learners – a five-year systematic literature review (2020–2025) , African Journal of Empirical Research: Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Jan-Mar 2026
- James Mwale, Vincent Kanyamuna, John Moose, Francis Simui, Perceived mitigation measures for sanitation challenges in George Compound, Lusaka, Zambia: A stakeholder perspective , African Journal of Empirical Research: Vol. 6 No. 4 (2025): Oct-Dec 2025













