Exploration of Science Teaching Self-Efficacy Sources from Multiple Narratives of Professional Development Experiences

Auteurs

  • Salifu Maigari Mohammed Department of Teacher Education, School of Education and Leadership, College of Education, University of Ghana, Legon-Accra, Ghana https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6390-1867
  • Austin Wontepaga Luguterah Department of Physical Education and Sports Studies, School of Education and Leadership, College of Education, University of Ghana, Legon-Accra, Ghana https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5268-1640

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.5.1.27

Mots-clés :

Inquiry-Based Science Teaching, Junior High School, Multi-Case Study, Professional Development, Self-Efficacy Sources, Traditional Science Instruction

Résumé

Professional developments are effective interventions for exposing teachers to self-efficacy sources that align with innovative (e.g., inquiry-based) science pedagogies. However, in many situations, teachers are tasked with implementing innovative science practices without consistent and enduring professional development experiences. The study explored science teaching self-efficacy sources in situations where provision of professional developments is inconsistent and circumstantial. In this multi-case study, self-efficacy sources were explored through narratives of science teachers and key educational administrators. Participants’ real-life experiences with professional development (PD) were analysed to identify and understand the sources of self-efficacy they found most significant. It examined the nature, types, and relevance of these sources without imposing external control. The study context emphasized regular, mandatory PD experiences for teachers, but participants were not currently undergoing any PD experiences. The study used a mixed sampling method to select 18 science teachers, 12 head teachers, four circuit supervisors, 3 science coordinators, and four deputy directors and director of education in urban and rural Ghana. The findings indicated that nearly all PD experiences embedded and exposed instructors to various sources of science teaching self-efficacy, with the highest being traditional-oriented cognitive content mastery (63.4%) and cognitive pedagogical mastery (65.9%). The majority of PD experiences were brief, with most lasting no more than five days, and often involved multiple subjects rather than focusing specifically on science. Overall, the study highlights the complexity of self-efficacy sources and the need for tailored, ongoing professional development opportunities for science teachers. The study recommends that those components of professional development experiences be carefully selected and integrated to embed and expose instructors to relevant and sufficient self-efficacy sources that align with innovative pedagogies emphasized in curricula documents.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Références

Ampiah, J. G. (2008). An investigation of provision of quality basic education in Ghana: A case study of selected schools in the Central Region. Journal of International Cooperation in Education, 11(3), 19-37.

Association for the Development of Education in Africa [ADEA]. (2016). Policy brief : In-service teacher education in sub-saharan Africa.

Avery, L. M., & Meyer, D. Z. (2012). Teaching science as science is practiced: Opportunities and limits for enhancing preservice elementary teachers' self-efficacy for science and science teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 112(7), 395-409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2012.00159.x

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4

Cetin-Dindar, A. (2022). Examining in-service and pre-service science teachers' learning environment perceptions and their sense of efficacy beliefs. Educational Studies, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2022.2121603

Chang, C.-Y., & Mao, S.-L. (1999). Comparison of Taiwan science students ' outcomes with inquiry-group versus traditonal instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 92(6), 340-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679909597617

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications Inc.

Curriculum Research and Development Division [CRDD]. (2007). National syllabus for integrated science: Junior high school. Curriculum Research and Development Division.

Curriculum Research and Development Division [CRDD]. (2012). National syllabus for integrated science: Junior high school. Curriculum Research and Development Division.

D'Alessio, M. A. (2018). The effect of microteaching on science teaching self-efficacy beliefs in preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(6), 441-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1456883

Gillies, R. M. (2008). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students' behaviours, discourse and learning during a science-based learning activity. School Psychology International, 29(3), 328-347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034308093673

Jacob, S. A., & Furgerson, S. P. (2012). Writing interview protocols and conducting interviews: Tips for students new to the field of qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 17(42), 1-10. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol17/iss42/3

Japan International Cooperation Agency [JICA]. (2014). Module 3 : School-based and cluster-based INSET ( SBI / CBI ) manual. https://www.jica.go.jp/project/Ghana/0604654/pdf/module_3_main_content.pdf

Lati, W., Supasorn, S., & Promarak, V. (2012). Enhancement of learning achievement and integrated science process skills using science inquiry learning activities of chemical reaction rates. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4471-4475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.279

Lee, S. C., Jack, A. R., & Novacek, G. (2022). PD with distance-based instructional coaching to improve elementary teacher' self-efficacy in teaching science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 33(5), 509-530. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.1965751

Lotter, C., Smiley, W., Thompson, S., & Dickenson, T. (2016). The impact of a professional development model on middle school science teachers' efficacy and implementation of inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 38(18), 2712-2741. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1259535

McKinnon, M., & Lamberts, R. (2014). Influencing science teaching self-efficacy beliefs of primary school teachers: A longitudinal case study. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 4(2), 172-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2013.793432

Menon, D. (2020). Influence of the sources of science teaching self-efficacy in preservice elementary teachers' identity development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(4), 460-481. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1718863

Menon, D., & Sadler, T. D. (2018). Sources of science teaching self-efficacy for preservice elementary teachers in science content courses. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 835-855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9813-7

Mohammed, S. M., Amponsah, K. D., Ampadu, E., & Kumassah, E. K. (2020). Extent of implementation of inquiry-based science teaching and learning in Ghanaian junior high schools. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), em 1928. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9373

Murphy, C., Smith, G., Mallon, B., & Redman, E. (2020). Teaching about sustainability through inquiry-based science in Irish primary classrooms: the impact of a professional development programme on teacher self-efficacy, competence and pedagogy. Environmental Education Research, 26(8), 1112-1136. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1776843

Naidoo, K., & Naidoo, L. J. (2021). Designing teaching and reflection experiences to develop candidates' science teaching self-efficacy. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(1), 211-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1895098

National Council for Curriculum & Assessment [NaCCA]. (2020). Science common core programme curriculum (B7- B10). National Council for Curriculum & Assessment of Ministry of Education.

National Research Council [NRC]. (1996). National science education standards. National Academcy Press.

National Research Council [NRC]. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. National Academcy Press.

National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academcy Press.

National Teaching Council [NTC]. (2020). A framework for professional development of teachers: Guidelines for point based - system. National Teaching Council.

Ngman-Wara, E. I. D. (2015). Ghanaian junior high school science teachers' knowledge of contextualised science instruction. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 4(1), 167-178. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v4n1p167

Palmer, D. (2011). Sources of efficacy information in an inservice program for elementary teachers. Science Education, 95(4), 577-600. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20434

Palmer, D. H. (2006). Sources of self-efficacy in a science methods course for primary teacher education students. Research in Science Education, 36(4), 337-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-9007-0

Perera, H. N., Maghsoudlou, A., Miller, C. J., McIlveen, P., Barber, D., Part, R., & Reyes, A. L. (2022). Relations of science teaching self-efficacy with instructional practices, student achievement and support, and teacher job satisfaction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 69, 102041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.102041

Coppola, P.M. (2019). Preparing preservice elementary teachers to teach engineering: Impact on self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. School Science and Mathematics, 119(3), 161-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12327

https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12327

Peters-Burton, E. E., Merz, S. A., Ramirez, E. M., & Saroughi, M. (2015). The effect of cognitive apprenticeship-based professional development on teacher self-efficacy of science teaching, motivation, knowledge calibration, and perceptions of inquiry-based teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(6), 525-548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9436-1

Rogan, J. M., & Grayson, D. J. (2003). Towards a theory of curriculum implementation with particular reference to science education in developing countries. International Journal of Science Education, 25(10), 1171-1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210145819

Seung, E., Park, S., & Lee, M. A. (2019). The impact of a summer camp-based science methods course on preservice teachers' self-efficacy in teaching science as inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(8), 872-889. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1635848

Şimşek, P., & Kabapinar, F. (2010). The effects of inquiry-based learning on elementary students' conceptual understanding of matter, scientific process skills and science attitudes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1190-1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.170

Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202-248. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202

Webb, D. L., & LoFaro, K. P. (2020). Sources of engineering teaching self-efficacy in a STEAM methods course for elementary preservice teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 120(4), 209-219. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12403

Wolf, S. J., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle-school science students using Inquiry-based laboratory activities. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 321-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9052-y

Téléchargements

Publiée

2024-02-29

Comment citer

Mohammed, S. M., & Luguterah, A. W. (2024). Exploration of Science Teaching Self-Efficacy Sources from Multiple Narratives of Professional Development Experiences. African Journal of Empirical Research, 5(1), 274–288. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.5.1.27

Numéro

Rubrique

Articles