Evaluating the performance of clinical officer anaesthetists’ curriculum from Kenya Medical Training College, Kenya

https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.6.4.55

Authors

Keywords:

Anaesthesia Training, Clinical Officer Anaesthetists (COAs), KMTC Curriculum, Professional Development

Abstract

The trend in Kenya is that the number of patients requiring safe anaesthesia services has increased along with the growth of the surgical services. The labour force remains strongly dependent on the COAs that have been trained in the Kenya Medical Training College. Physician anaesthesiologists remain in serious shortage in Kenya, as only less than 200 are available to over 50 million people. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Clinical Officer Anaesthetists’ curriculum at Kenya Medical Training College. This study was anchored on the Context, Input, Process, Product model. Cross-sectional design was used, which allowed use of both qualitative and quantitative methods. Level five hospitals were selected as the study area. The census method was used for clinical officer anaesthetics (140), and seven anaesthesiologists were interviewed. Questionnaires and interview guides were used for data collection. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences aided data analysis. Qualitative data was coded and reported in narration and verbatim. Strict ethical guidelines were followed in this study. Findings of this study reveal that the perceptions of Clinical Officer Anaesthetists (COAs) trained by KMTC are typically seen as competent, with the mean scores in all domains being 3.63 to 3.72. The correlation analysis shows highly significant and strong relationships between competence in the practice of anaesthesia, effective communication and collaboration, patient outcomes from knowledge and skills and professional development and improvement (r = 0.957 to r = 0.986, p = 0.001). This study concludes that clinical officer anaesthetists trained at KMTC are competent in their practice of anaesthesia and teamwork and positively impactful on patient outcomes. Nevertheless, the possibilities of professional development are still restricted, and there is concern regarding the possibility of long-term development and preparedness foradvanced practice. It recommends that KMTC should enhance its curriculum by incorporating formal continuing professional development like regional anaesthesia, increasing exposure to more advanced anaesthetic methods, and providing more mentorship.

Dimensions

Al Shamsi, A. (2020). An investigation into knowledge sharing in cross professional teams in healthcare: A multi-method, qualitative case study design (Doctoral dissertation, University of Sheffield).

Choo, V. (2020). The state of anesthesia practice in Sub-Saharan Africa: Statistics, case studies, and ways forward (Doctoral dissertation).

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Gasparini, M., Khan, S., Patel, J. M., Parekh, D., Bangash, M. N., Stϋmpfle, R., Shah, A., Baharlo, B., Soni, S., & Collaborators (2021). Renal impairment and its impact on clinical outcomes in patients who are critically ill with COVID-19: a multicentre observational study. Anaesthesia, 76(3), 320-326. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15293 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15293

Gelb, A. W., Morriss, W. W., Johnson, W., Merry, A. F., Abayadeera, A., Belîi, N., Brull, S. J., Chibana, A., Evans, F., Goddia, C., Haylock-Loor, C., Khan, F., Leal, S., Lin, N., Merchant, R., Newton, M. W., Rowles, J. S., Sanusi, A., Wilson, I., Velazquez Berumen, A., … International Standards for a Safe Practice of Anesthesia Workgroup (2018). World Health Organization-World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists (WHO-WFSA) International Standards for a Safe Practice of Anesthesia. Anesthesia and analgesia, 126(6), 2047-2055. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002927

Ho, M., Livingston, P., Bould, D., Nyandwi, J. D., Nizeyimana, F., Uwineza, J. B., & Urquhart, R. (2019). Barriers and facilitators to implementing a regional anesthesia service in a low-income country: A qualitative study. Pan African Medical Journal, 32, Article 152. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2019.32.152.17246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2019.32.152.17246

Kempthorne, P., Morriss, W. W., Mellin-Olsen, J., & Gore-Booth, J. (2017). The WFSA global anesthesia workforce survey. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 125(3), 981-990. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002258 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002258

Kenya Medical Training College. (2019). Annual report on curriculum and training standards. Nairobi, Kenya: Kenya Medical Training College.

Mumbo, H. M., & Kinaro, J. W. (2015). Assessment of quality and relevance of curricula development in health training institutions: a case study of Kenya. Human resources for health, 13, 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-015-0048-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-015-0048-9

Mussa, S. S., & Sweetbert, A. (2025). Regional Anaesthesia in Low-Resource Settings: Focusing on Sub-Saharan Africa. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1011846 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1011846

Nyamai, K., & Mutisya, R. (2013). Impact of clinical officer anaesthetist training programme at the Kenya Medical Training College, Nakuru, on trainee satisfaction, quality of practice, and cadre shortfall alleviation. East African Medical Journal, 90(7), 226-234.

Royal College of Anaesthetists. (2021). Anaesthesia curriculum 2021. London, UK: Author.

Ruscher, A. (2024). Optimizing postoperative care: The significance of simulation training in reducing adverse events and promoting patient safety (Doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University).

Shirley, H., & Wamai, R. (2022). A Narrative Review of Kenya's Surgical Capacity Using the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery's Indicator Framework. Global health, science and practice, 10(1), e2100500. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00500 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00500

Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). The CIPP model for program evaluation. In F. F. Madaus, M. Scriven, & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (pp. 117-141). Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6669-7_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6675-8_7

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). The CIPP model for evaluation. In D. L. Stufflebeam, G. F. Madaus, & T. Kellaghan (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (pp. 279-317). Springer Netherlands.

https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47559-6_16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47559-6_16

Published

2025-11-01

How to Cite

Njeru, K. K., Mutua, F., Muinde, F., Ngunjiri, D., Mwangi, G., & Nandebe, D. W. (2025). Evaluating the performance of clinical officer anaesthetists’ curriculum from Kenya Medical Training College, Kenya. African Journal of Empirical Research, 6(4), 614–621. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.6.4.55

Most read articles by the same author(s)