Governance assurance and disclosure discipline in regulated and listed firms: A consolidated framework for the company secretary role in Zambia

Shuko Ndhlovu; Beatrice  Matafwali; Austin Mwange

doi:10.51867/ajernet.7.1.93

Autores

Shuko Ndhlovu The University of Zambia, Zambia
Beatrice Matafwali The University of Zambia, Zambia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2028-180X
Austin Mwange The University of Zambia, Zambia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.1.93

Palavras-chave:

Board Effectiveness, Company Secretary, Disclosure Governance, Documentation Integrity, Governance Assurance, Regulated Sectors, Zambia

Resumo

In regulated and listed environments, governance is judged not only by board structures but also by the reliability of the board’s operating system: agenda architecture, committee cycles, decision-ready papers, minute integrity, action tracking, and disclosure approval trails. Despite this, the company secretary role is often reduced to an administrative function. This paper consolidates two related conceptual manuscripts into a single integrative article that reframes the company secretary as a governance assurance function and disclosure-discipline enabler in Zambia’s high-scrutiny sectors. Using an integrative review with thematic synthesis, complemented by analysis of Zambia-relevant governance instruments, the paper reports a dedicated findings section, develops a consolidated framework, and proposes an implementation toolkit with independence safeguards for dual executive–secretary configurations. The study contributes a practical, auditable model for improving board effectiveness and disclosure credibility and outlines testable propositions for future empirical research in Zambia. Conclusion: In regulated and listed Zambian firms, the company secretary is best conceptualised as a governance assurance function that strengthens board effectiveness through decision-ready information controls, documentation integrity, and auditable disclosure workflows. Recommendations: Boards should formally mandate minimum board operating-system controls (board pack protocol, minutes and action tracking discipline, and mapped disclosure approvals with evidence retention) and adopt explicit independence safeguards where the secretary holds dual executive roles.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2007). A theory of friendly boards. The Journal of Finance, 62(1), 217-250.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01206.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01206.x

Arnold, M., Goldschmitt, M., & Rigotti, T. (2023). Dealing with information overload: A comprehensive review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1122200. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1122200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1122200

Asahak, S., Albrecht, S. L., De Sanctis, M., & Barnett, N. S. (2018). Boards of directors: Assessing their functioning and validation of a multi-dimensional measure. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2425. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02425

Bank of Zambia. (2016). Corporate governance directives (Banking and Financial Services). Bank of Zambia. Retrieved March 03, 2026, from https://www.boz.zm/CorporateGovernanceDirectives.pdf.

Bezemer, P.-J., Pugliese, A., Nicholson, G., & Zattoni, A. (2023). Toward a synthesis of the board-strategy relationship: A literature review and future research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 31(1), 178-197. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12481

https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12481 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12481

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Coffee, J. C., Jr. (2004). Gatekeeper failure and reform: The challenge of fashioning relevant reforms. Boston University Law Review, 84(2), 301-364. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.447940 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.447940

Companies Act, No. 10 of 2017 (Zambia). (2017). Zambia Legal Information Institute. https://zambialii.org/akn/zm/act/2017/10.

Financial Reporting Council. (2018). The UK corporate governance code. Financial Reporting Council. https://www.frc.org.uk/directors/corporate-governance-and-stewardship/uk-corporate-governance-code.

Halim, S. A. A., Lokman, N., & Othman, S. (2023). Corporate governance and board effectiveness: A systematic literature review of the company secretary role. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 8(3), 209-234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol8iss3pp209-234

Huang, H., Wang, C., Yu, W., & Zhu, K. (2023). Does powerful executive holding a dual post as the board secretary reduce nonpunitive regulation? International Review of Financial Analysis, 89, 102797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102797 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102797

Institute of Directors in Southern Africa. (2016). King IV report on corporate governance for South Africa. Institute of Directors in Southern Africa. https://www.iodsa.co.za/page/KingIV.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

John, K., & Senbet, L. W. (1998). Corporate governance and board effectiveness. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(4), 371-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(98)00005-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(98)00005-3

Kakabadse, A., & Khan, N. (2016). Company secretary: A role of breadth and majesty. Society and Business Review, 11(3), 333-352. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-04-2016-0023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-04-2016-0023

Kraakman, R. H. (1986). Gatekeepers: The anatomy of a third-party enforcement strategy. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 2(1), 53-104. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a036906 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a036906

Lusaka Securities Exchange. (2005, March). LuSE corporate governance code for listed and quoted companies. Lusaka Securities Exchange. https://www.luse.co.zm/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/LUSE-CORPRATE-GOVERNANCE-CODE.pdf.

Lusaka Securities Exchange. (2012). Harmonised listings requirements of the Lusaka Stock Exchange (Revised March 2008

effective September 17, 2012). Lusaka Securities Exchange. https://www.luse.co.zm/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/LuSE-Listing-Rules-1.pdf.

McNulty, T., & Stewart, A. (2015). Developing the governance space: A study of the role and potential of the company secretary in and around the board of directors. Organization Studies, 36(4), 513-535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614556919 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614556919

Nowland, J., Chapple, L., & Johnston, J. (2021). The role of the company secretary in facilitating board effectiveness: Reporting and compliance. Accounting & Finance, 61(S1), 1425-1456. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12632 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12632

OECD. (2015). G20/OECD principles of corporate governance. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/corporate/principles-corporate-governance.

Okike, E. N. M. (2007). Corporate governance in Nigeria: The status quo. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 173-193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00553.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00553.x

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Peij, S., & Bezemer, P.-J. (2021). Exploring the key challenges facing company secretaries in a two-tier board context. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(5), 815-830. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2020-0226 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2020-0226

Quan, Y., Zhou, C., Bao, R., & Long, L. (2022). Do board secretaries with financial expertise reduce regulatory inquiries? Empirical evidence based on the China stock exchange's annual report comment letter. China Journal of Accounting Studies, 10(3), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2022.2082718 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2022.2082718

Ronoowah, R. K., & Seetanah, B. (2024). Governance disclosure quality and firm performance: Empirical evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 15(1), 176-200. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-09-2023-0295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-09-2023-0295

Roy, M.-J. (2011). Board information: Meeting the evolving needs of corporate directors. Management Research Review, 34(7), 773-789. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171111146670 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171111146670

Schwartz-Ziv, M., & Weisbach, M. S. (2013). What do boards really do? Evidence from minutes of board meetings. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(2), 349-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.04.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.04.011

Securities (Amendment) Act, No. 21 of 2022 (Zambia). (2022). Parliament of Zambia. https://www.parliament.gov.zm/sites/default/files/documents/acts/Act%20No.%2021%20The%20Securities%20Act%2C%202022.pdf.

Song, Y., & Zhu, M. (2023). The staggered tenure of CEO and board secretary and information disclosure quality. Finance Research Letters, 58, 104681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104681 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104681

Wang, C., Ye, Q., & Goyal, A. (2019). Does tenure matter? Role of the corporate secretary in Chinese-listed firms. Accounting Horizons, 33(1), 181-205. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-52225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-52225

Xing, L., Duan, T., & Hou, W. (2019). Do board secretaries influence management earnings forecasts? Journal of Business Ethics, 154(2), 537-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3478-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3478-6

Xu, W., Cao, H., Qin, S., & Kong, X. (2021). Board secretary and market information efficiency: Evidence from corporate site visits. China Journal of Accounting Research, 14(3), 275-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2021.02.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2021.02.003

Zhu, X., Hu, D. S., Semba, D., & Fang, F. (2025). Influence of company secretary characteristics on information disclosure violations: Evidence from China. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 22(3), 791-806. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-024-00268-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-024-00268-x