Evolving students’ learning habits from books to robotics: A case of college of business education, Dar es Salaam Campus, Tanzania

https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.6.4.38

Autores

Palavras-chave:

AI-powered Tools, Learning Habits, Robotics, Robotic Tools, Technology Adoption

Resumo

The use of robotics and Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered conversational tools is quickly transforming the way education operates, especially at the higher learning level. This research examined how these innovations are being adopted at the College of Business Education (CBE) in Dar es Salaam and investigated their influence on students’ academic outcomes and learning patterns. The study was guided by the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which explains how perceptions of ease of use and usefulness affect the adoption of technology, and by Cognitive Load Theory (CLT), which highlights the importance of controlling mental effort in the learning process. A mixed methods approach was applied, bringing together survey data from 389 respondents chosen through stratified and simple random sampling along with qualitative insights collected from interviews. The study gathered information through structured questionnaires and detailed interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS, while qualitative responses were examined through thematic analysis. Findings showed that students who had access to robotics tools demonstrated higher levels of engagement, stronger motivation, and better academic performance. The main factors that encouraged adoption included ease of use, the ability to adapt to individual learning styles, and the support provided by the instructors. Students especially appreciated the interactive and personalized learning environments made possible through robotics, as these enhanced their overall learning experience. However, the study also pointed out important challenges. Serious concerns remain regarding limited access, especially for students from less privileged backgrounds, and the possibility of becoming overly dependent on technology. These challenges bring up questions about digital equity and the potential decline of independent learning abilities. The study suggests that access to robotics technologies should broaden, provide focused training for both students and instructors, and officially weave robotics into the curriculum. It is essential to adopt a steady approach that takes advantage of robotics while still honoring traditional teaching methods. Striking this balance is key to helping students grow into independent, critical thinkers. The study provides important insights for using robotics effectively and fairly in higher education, especially in developing countries.

Dimensions

Abuali, T., & Ahmed, A. A. (2025). Challenges and opportunities in implementing e-learning in developing countries. The Open European Journal of Social Science and Education (OEJSSE), 1(1), 1-12.

Adeoye, M. A. (2024). Mastering the basics: A guide to research methodology for effective writing and publication. Chalim Journal of Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.31538/cjotl.v4i1.1345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31538/cjotl.v4i1.1345

Aderibigbe, A. O., Ohenhen, P. E., Nwaobia, N. K., Gidiagba, J. O., & Ani, E. C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in developing countries: Bridging the gap between potential and implementation. Computer Science & IT Research Journal, 4(3), 185-199. https://doi.org/10.51594/csitrj.v4i3.629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51594/csitrj.v4i3.629

Anggraini, F., Meutia, S., & Irwansyah, D. (2025). Analysis of the influence of student decisions in using artificial intelligence (AI) as a learning reference. Jurnal Sistem Teknik Industri, 27(3), 236-246.

Arocena, I., Huegun-Burgos, A., & Rekalde-Rodriguez, I. (2022). Robotics and education: A systematic review. TEM Journal, 11(1), 379-385.

https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM111-48 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM111-48

Bhatia, A., Bhatia, P., & Sood, D. (2024). Leveraging AI to transform online higher education: Focusing on personalized learning, assessment, and student engagement. International Journal of Management and Humanities (IJMH), 11(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijmh.A1753.11010924

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4959186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4959186

Bowman, W. M. (2023). Tanzania: Technological lessons from the past. In Digital development in East Africa: The distribution, diffusion, and governance of information technology (pp. 81-112). Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22162-0_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22162-0_4

Cantutay, Z., & Taganas, W. R. (2024). Computer upskilling trainings and teachers' technological literacy: Basis for technological skills enhancement plan. American Journal of Arts and Human Science, 3(2), 215-240.

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajahs.v3i2.2863 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54536/ajahs.v3i2.2863

Casheekar, A., Lahiri, A., Rath, K., Prabhakar, K. S., & Srinivasan, K. (2024). A contemporary review on chatbots, AI-powered virtual conversational agents, ChatGPT: Applications, open challenges and future research directions. Computer Science Review, 52, 100628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2024.100632 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2024.100632

Contrino, M. F., Reyes-Millán, M., Vázquez-Villegas, P., & Membrillo-Hernández, J. (2024). Using an adaptive learning tool to improve student performance and satisfaction in online and face-to-face education for a more personalized approach. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 1-6.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00292-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00292-y

Dehghani, H., & Mashhadi, A. (2024). Exploring Iranian English as a foreign language teachers' acceptance of ChatGPT in English language teaching: Extending the technology acceptance model. Education and Information Technologies, 29(15), 19813-19834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12660-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12660-9

Ghofur, A. (2025). From classroom to sustainability: The impact of AI-integrated educational robotics. In Innovations in Educational Robotics: Advancing AI for Sustainable Development (pp. 221-234). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.

https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-6165-8.ch011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-6165-8.ch011

Hu, L., Zhang, W., & Lin, P. (2025). Can the utilization of technology-enhanced learning spaces lead to improved learning outcomes? A meta-analysis based on 39 experimental and quasi-experimental studies. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(4), 3052-3072. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2436943 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2436943

Izah, S. C., Sylva, L., & Hait, M. (2023). Cronbach's alpha: A cornerstone in ensuring reliability and validity in environmental health assessment. ES Energy & Environment, 23, 1050-1057. https://doi.org/10.30919/esee1057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30919/esee1057

Kennedy, I. (2022). Sample size determination in test-retest and Cronbach alpha reliability estimates. British Journal of Contemporary Education, 2(1), 17-29.

https://doi.org/10.52589/BJCE-FY266HK9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52589/BJCE-FY266HK9

Kundu, S., & Das, M. (2025). A comparative study of learning outcomes of self-directed and instructor-led learning for postgraduate students in an Indian B-School. Journal of Education for Business, 100(1), 22-34.

https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2024.2438670 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2024.2438670

Lai, C. L. (2021). Exploring university students' preferences for AI-assisted learning environment: A drawing analysis with activity theory framework. Educational Technology and Society, 24(4), 1-15.

Lambert, L. S., & Newman, D. A. (2023). Construct development and validation in three practical steps: Recommendations for reviewers, editors, and authors. Organizational Research Methods, 26(4), 574-607.

https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281221115374 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281221115374

Li, Y., Chen, D., & Deng, X. (2024). The impact of digital educational games on student's motivation for learning: The mediating effect of learning engagement and the moderating effect of the digital environment. PloS One, 19(1), e0294350.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294350

Licardo, J. T., Domjan, M., & Orehovački, T. (2024). Intelligent robotics-A systematic review of emerging technologies and trends. Electronics, 13(3), 535-542.

https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13030542 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13030542

Liesa-Orús, M., Latorre-Cosculluela, C., Sierra-Sánchez, V., & Vázquez-Toledo, S. (2023). Links between ease of use, perceived usefulness and attitudes towards technology in older people in university: A structural equation modelling approach. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 2419-2436.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11292-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11292-1

Mai, V., Vanderborght, B., Haidegger, T., Khamis, A., Bhargava, N., Boesl, D. B. O., Gabriels, K., Jacobs, A., Moon, A. J., & Murphy, R. (2022). The role of robotics in achieving the United Nations sustainable development goals-the experts' meeting at the 2021 IEEE/RSJ IROS workshop [industry activities]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 29(1), 92-107. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2022.3143409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2022.3143409

Nie, J., Yuan, Y., Chao, X., Li, Y., & Lv, L. (2024). In smart classroom: Investigating the relationship between human-computer interaction, cognitive load and academic emotion. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40(13), 3528-3538. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2190257 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2190257

Rahman, M. M. (2023). Sample size determination for survey research and non-probability sampling techniques: A review and set of recommendations. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Business and Economics, 11(1), 42-62.

Rakhmanina, A., Pinchuk, I., Vyshnyk, O., Tryfonova, O., Koycheva, T., Sydorko, V., & Ilienko, O. (2022). The usage of robotics as an element of STEM education in the educational process. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 22(5), 645-651.

Rane, N., Choudhary, S., & Rane, J. (2024). Education 4.0 and 5.0: Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) for personalized and adaptive learning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, 1(1), 29-43. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4638365 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4638365

Ratnawati, A. T., & Darmanto, S. (2023). Role of attitude and intention on the relationship between perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, trust, and e-tax system behavior. Global Business & Finance Review (GBFR), 28(7), 89-104.

https://doi.org/10.17549/gbfr.2023.28.7.89 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17549/gbfr.2023.28.7.89

Reddy, K. G., & Khan, M. G. M. (2023). Constructing efficient strata boundaries in stratified sampling using survey cost. Heliyon, 9(11), Article e22118.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21407

Safonov, Y., Usyk, V., & Bazhenkov, I. (2022). Digital transformations of education policy. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 8(2), 127-136.

https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2022-8-2-127-136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2022-8-2-127-136

Saparbayeva, E., Abdualiyeva, M., Torebek, Y., Madiyarov, N., & Tursynbayev, A. (2024). Leveraging digital tools to advance mathematics competencies among construction students. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2319436.

https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2319436 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2319436

Soori, M., Dastres, R., Arezoo, B., & Jough, F. K. G. (2024). Intelligent robotic systems in Industry 4.0: A review. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Science and Technology, 4(3), Article 2024007.

Su, F., & Zou, D. (2024). A comparative review of technology-assisted and non-technology concept mapping-based language learning. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 6, 100319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100319

Sweller, J. (2023). The development of cognitive load theory: Replication crises and incorporation of other theories can lead to theory expansion. Educational Psychology Review, 35(4), Article 95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09817-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09817-2

Uslu, N. A., Yavuz, G. Ö., & Usluel, Y. K. (2023). A systematic review study on educational robotics and robots. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5874-5898. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2023890 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2023890

Zhang, D., Wang, J., Jing, Y., & Shen, A. (2024). The impact of robotics on STEM education: Facilitating cognitive and interdisciplinary advancements. Applied and Computational Engineering, 69(1), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/69/20241433 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/69/20241433

Zhang, Y., & Zhu, Y. (2024). Effects of educational robotics on the creativity and problem-solving skills of K-12 students: A meta-analysis. Educational Studies, 50(6), 1539-1557. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2022.2107873 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2022.2107873

Publicado

2025-10-20

Como Citar

Masepo, D., & Banele, S. D. (2025). Evolving students’ learning habits from books to robotics: A case of college of business education, Dar es Salaam Campus, Tanzania. African Journal of Empirical Research, 6(4), 437–445. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.6.4.38

Edição

Secção

Articles