Zambia’s fragile recovery: Integrating cost-of-living relief, structural transformation, and governance for sustainable development

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.2.66

Keywords:

Cost of Living, Copper Dependence, Gender, Governance, Political Economy, Social Protection, Structural Transformation, Sustainable Development, Zambia

Abstract

While Zambia’s macroeconomic recovery following debt restructuring has restored investor confidence, it has not translated into broad-based improvements in household welfare. As the cost of living rises, the cost of food, fuel and energy continues to erode real incomes and make poverty and inequality worse. The article proposes an integrated sustainable development framework that tackles simultaneously short-term social protection, medium-term economic diversification into climate-resilient sectors, and governance reforms that restore the social contract. The study empirically demonstrates the widening gap between macroeconomic gains and lived experience by systematically analysing 137 Zambian newspaper articles (January 2024 – June 2025), triangulated with Jesuit Centre for Theological Reflection (JCTR) Basic Needs Basket data and civil society monitoring reports. The analysis finds that structural barriers, such as dependence on copper, low-productivity rain-fed agriculture and vulnerability in the hydropower sector, and governance contradictions, such as constricted civic space and perceptions of selective anti-corruption enforcement, are undermining sustainable development. The political economy perspective exposes the vested interests and institutional path dependencies that sustain policy inertia, while gender analysis exposes the disproportionate burden on women in coping with price shocks. Drawing on these findings, the article proposes a complementary suite of actions, including scaling up digital cash transfers indexed to a basic-needs basket; reforming the Food Reserve Agency via transparent price triggers and competitive tendering; investing in climate-resilient agriculture and solar energy diversification; implementing labour-intensive public works in climate-resilient infrastructure; amending the Public Order Act to a simple notification regime; depoliticising anti-corruption enforcement through transparent case selection and visible reinvestment of recovered assets into social protection; and institutionalising a permanent multi-stakeholder forum to co-produce cost-of-living policies – all anchored in the Sustainable Development Goals. In the absence of such an integrated governance-centred approach, Zambia’s stabilisation will remain fragile, with economic shocks and governance deficits reinforcing one another.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Business. https://doi.org/10.1355/ae29-2j

Addison, T., Niño‐Zarazúa, M., & Pirttilä, J. (2018). Fiscal policy, state building and economic development. Journal of International Development, 30(2), 161-172. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3305

Afrobarometer. (2018). Summary results of Zambia Round 7 survey. Institute of Economic and Social Research, University of Zambia.

Andrews, M., Pritchett, L., & Woolcock, M. (2017). Building state capability: Evidence, analysis, action. Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747482.001.0001

Barca, V., Hebbar, M., Malik, M., & Le, F. (2019). Shock-responsive social protection in the Caribbean: Literature review (Literature Review No. 68).

Bhorat, H., Kanbur, R., & Stanwix, B. (2017). Minimum wages in Sub-Saharan Africa: A primer. The World Bank Research Observer, 32(1), 21-74. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkw003

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Carothers, T., & Brechenmacher, S. (2014). Closing space: Democracy and human rights support under fire (Vol. 61). Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Carothers, T., & O'Donohue, A. (Eds.). (2019). Democracies divided: The global challenge of political polarization. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. https://doi.org/10.5040/9780815750819

Chapoto, A., Zulu-Mbata, O., Hoffman, B. D., Kabaghe, C., Sitko, N., Kuteya, A., & Zulu, B. (2015). The politics of maize in Zambia: Who holds the keys to change the status quo? Food Security Collaborative Working Papers 212905, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.

Diao, X., McMillan, M., & Rodrik, D. (2019). The recent growth boom in developing economies: A structural-change perspective. In C. R. J. et al. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of development economics: Critical reflections on globalisation and development (pp. 281-334). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14000-7_9

Economist Intelligence Unit. (2025). Country risk report: Zambia. Economist Intelligence Unit.

Fisher, M., Abate, T., Lunduka, R. W., Asnake, W., Alemayehu, Y., & Madulu, R. B. (2015). Drought tolerant maize for farmer adaptation to drought in sub-Saharan Africa: Determinants of adoption in eastern and southern Africa. Climatic Change, 133(2), 283-299.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1459-2

Food and Agriculture Organization. (2018). The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2018: Building climate resilience for food security and nutrition. FAO.

Gibbs, A., Jewkes, R., Willan, S., & Washington, L. (2018). Associations between poverty, mental health and substance use, gender power, and intimate partner violence amongst young (18-30) women and men in urban informal settlements in South Africa: A cross-sectional study and structural equation model. PLoS ONE, 13(10), e0204956. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204956

Hickey, S., Lavers, T., Niño Zarazúa, M., & Seekings, J. (2018). The negotiated politics of social protection in sub-Saharan Africa. WIDER Working Paper 2018/34. UNU-WIDER.

https://doi.org/10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2018/476-6

Hidrobo, M., Hoddinott, J., Kumar, N., & Olivier, M. (2018). Social protection, food security, and asset formation. World Development, 101, 88-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.08.003

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2018). Global warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC special report. IPCC.

Ivanic, M., & Martin, W. (2015). Short- and long-run impacts of food price changes on poverty. Conference Paper 332665, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.

https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7011

Jesuit Centre for Theological Reflection. (2025). Basic needs basket: Annual summary, 2024-2025. JCTR.

Johnson, N. L., Kovarik, C., Meinzen-Dick, R., Njuki, J., & Quisumbing, A. R. (2016). Gender, assets, and agricultural development: Lessons from eight projects. World Development, 83, 295-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.01.009

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.01.009

Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781353

McMillan, M., Rodrik, D., & Sepulveda, C. (2017). Structural change, fundamentals and growth: A framework and case studies (No. w23378). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23378

https://doi.org/10.3386/w23378

Ministry of Finance and National Planning. (2023). Economic report 2022. Government of Zambia.

Morris, M., Kaplinsky, R., & Kaplan, D. (2012). "One thing leads to another"-Commodities, linkages and industrial development. Resources Policy, 37(4), 408-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.06.002

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.06.002

Rodrik, D. (2018). Straight talk on trade: Ideas for a sane world economy. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400888900

https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400888900

Ross, M. L. (2015). What have we learned about the resource curse? Annual Review of Political Science, 18(1), 239-259. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052213-040359

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052213-040359

Sen, A. (1999). Freedom. Oxford University Press.

Stritzke, S. (2018). 'Clean energy for all': The implementation of Scaling Solar in Zambia. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 15(3), 214-225. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJSTSD-02-2018-0016

https://doi.org/10.1108/WJSTSD-11-2017-0042

UN Human Rights Council. (2025). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression: Visit to Zambia (A/HRC/59/50/Add.2). United Nations. https://undocs.org/A/HRC/59/50/Add.2

United Nations. (2018). The sustainable development goals report 2018. United Nations. https://doi.org/10.18356/92f8ec0a-en

https://doi.org/10.18356/92f8ec0a-en

World Bank. (2017). World development report 2017: Governance and the law. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0950-7

https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0950-7

World Bank. (2024). Poverty and equity brief: Zambia. World Bank.

World Bank. (2025). Zambia economic update 2025. World Bank.

Zambia Human Rights Commission. (2025). Annual state of human rights report 2024. ZHRC.

Zambia Institute for Policy Analysis and Research. (2025). Urban poverty and food security monitor, issue 4. ZIPAR.

Zambia Statistics Agency. (2023). Living conditions monitoring survey 2022. Government of Zambia.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-15

How to Cite

Zulu, A. C., & Mukuka, C. K. (2026). Zambia’s fragile recovery: Integrating cost-of-living relief, structural transformation, and governance for sustainable development. African Journal of Empirical Research, 7(2), 732–741. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.2.66