Strategies to mitigate challenges facing students in selection and progression in agriculture career in tertiary institutions of Kenya

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.2.65

Keywords:

Agriculture Career, Students, Selection and Progression, Tertiary Institutions

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the strategies to be employed to mitigate challenges facing students in selection and progression in agriculture careers in tertiary institutions of Bungoma and Kakamega counties, Kenya. Founded on the Occupation Choice Theory and Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT), the study employed a descriptive research design for data collection, coupled with mixed methods applying both quantitative and qualitative approaches for better triangulation of the findings. The study population from two counties comprised 694 university undergraduate students enrolled in agriculture programmes and 3855 technical and vocational training students enrolled for agricultural programmes. Purposive sampling was used to select Bungoma and Kakamega counties. Tertiary institutions were then selected by census method since all could be accessed to participate in the study. The data was collected using questionnaires, interview guides, focus group discussions and interview protocols. Due diligence was taken into consideration while collecting and processing data to ensure both reliability and validity of the study. The study used both descriptive and inferential techniques to analyse the collected data. Thematic analysis was appropriately used to guide and validate the contributions of the study. The greatest challenge to progression was poor ministry policies on programme selection in agriculture subjects in secondary schools of Kakamega and Bungoma Counties. The study revealed that the ministry of agriculture could review salary scales and create more job opportunities, while the ministry of education could make agricultural programmes business-orientated and lower entry grades to university or technical and vocational education training institutions, among other issues. The summary model significant test shows that the strategies mentioned accounted for 27.9% variance in mitigating challenges, R²=.279, F (4, 359) = 34.782, p < .05. This implies that the strategies mentioned can significantly mitigate the challenges to selection and progression in agricultural programmes. The model coefficient analysis on strategies showed that creating more jobs (β=.221, p<.05), career guiding and counselling (β=.392, p<.05) and provision of scholarships (β=.137, p<.05) were some of the significant strategies to mitigate challenges facing progression in agricultural careers. The finding implies that the mentioned significant strategies are effective to mitigate challenges to progression in an agricultural career. The results obtained should guide effort for suggesting strategies to promote career progression of students in agricultural programmes in Kenya and inform policymakers on reorientation of agriculture education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adebo, G. M., & Sekumade, A. B. (2013). Determinants of career choice of agricultural profession among the students of the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences in Ekiti State University, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, 5(11), 249-255. https://doi.org/10.5897/JAERD2013.0508

Almocera, R. J., Conway, G. D., & Ouano, J. A. (2020). Investigating homesickness among first-year university students: Relations with social connectedness and academic engagement. Philippine Journal of Counselling Psychology, 22(1), 61-80.

Anquilo-de Asis, L. (2013). Issues and strategic approaches in strengthening agricultural education: The case of The University of Eastern Philippines. Journal of Energy Technologies and Policy, 3(11), 46-51.

Ariyo, J. A., & Mortimore, M. (2012). Youth farming and Nigeria's development dilemma: The Shonga experiment. IDS Bulletin, 43(6), 58-66.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2012.00379.x

Calvin, J., & Pense, S. L. (2013). Barriers and solutions to recruitment strategies of students into post-secondary agricultural education programs: A focus group approach. Journal of Agricultural Education, 54(4), 45-57. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2013.04045

Chapman, D. W. (1981). A model of student college choice. The Journal of Higher Education, 52(5), 490-505.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1981.11778120

Ekwere, U. E. (2014). Impact of practicals on students' choice of agricultural science in secondary schools in Abi Local Government Area of Cross River State [Seminar paper, University of Calabar, Department of Vocational and Special Education, Faculty of Education].

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2016). The state of food and agriculture: Climate change, agriculture and food security. FAO.

Huitt, W. (2011). Bloom et al.'s taxonomy of the cognitive domain. Educational Psychology Interactive, 22, 1-4.

Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79-122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027

Manyasi, A. N. (2021). Global influential factors for choice of agriculture related courses among students: A review paper. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 11(2), 20-28. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-1102062028

Mugenda, A. G. (2008). Social science research: Theory and principles. Acts Press.

Ochuodho, J. O. (2016). Status of the higher agricultural education sector in Kenya: A sector at crossroads. African Journal of Rural Development, 1(2), 171-178.

Ongang'a, P. O., Nkurumwa, A. O., & Konyango, J. J. O. (2015). Factors related to secondary school students' choice of agriculture subject in Uriri Sub-County, Kenya. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(2), 46-55. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-05234655

Orodho, A. J., & Kombo, D. K. (2002). Research methods. Kenyatta University, Institute of Open Learning.

Parsons, F. (1909). Choosing a vocation. Houghton Mifflin.

Pratley, J., & Crawley, N. (2018). Graduate destinations in agriculture. Agricultural Science, 29(2/1), 6-15.

Taghibaygi, M., Rafe, M., & Moosavi, S. A. (2015). Analysis of students' motivation in vocational schools and agricultural training centers in Kermanshah Province toward studying the field of agriculture. International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research, 3(1), 105-114.

Tiraieyari, N., & Krauss, S. E. (2018). Predicting youth participation in urban agriculture in Malaysia: Insights from the theory of planned behavior and the functional approach to volunteer motivation. Agriculture and Human Values, 35(3), 637-650.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-018-9854-8

United Nations Development Programme. (2014). Assessing the socio-economic impacts of Ebola virus disease in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone: The road to recovery (Report No. 267621). UNDP.

Woelfel, J. (1975). A theory of occupational choice. In Picou, J. S., & Campbell, R. B. (Eds.), Career behavior: Theory and research (pp. 41-62).

World Bank. (2013). World development indicators 2013. World Bank. https://data.worldbank.org

https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-9616-2

Downloads

Published

2026-05-14

How to Cite

Manyasi, A. N. (2026). Strategies to mitigate challenges facing students in selection and progression in agriculture career in tertiary institutions of Kenya. African Journal of Empirical Research, 7(2), 723–731. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.2.65