The impact of stakeholder participation in monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems on value for money in Nachingwea District Council projects in Tanzania

Joshua Simon Mnyang’ali; Janeth Jackson Mathia

doi:10.51867/ajernet.7.1.100

Authors

Joshua Simon Mnyang’ali Tengeru Institute of Community Development, Tanzania
Janeth Jackson Mathia Dar es Salaam University College of Education, Tanzania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.1.100

Keywords:

Local Government Projects, Monitoring and Evaluation Systems, Public Sector Accountability, Stakeholder Participation, Value for Money

Abstract

This study discussed an account of stakeholder engagement on monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems and their effects on value for money (VfM) in the monitor and evaluate project implemented by Nachingwea District Council, Tanzania. The study followed a positivist philosophy and was guided by the theory of change with a descriptive research design. Purposive and simple random sampling were used to select a sample of 134 respondents out of 200 council staff. Structured questionnaires were used to gather data on a five-point Likert scale and analyzed by SPSS (Version 27) with the help of descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression analysis. The results suggest that despite the prevalence and perceived positivity of stakeholder participation (especially stakeholder inclusion and decision-making participation), the effectiveness of M&E systems in terms of producing VfM outcomes, including sustainability, efficiency, transparency, and attaining the desired outcomes, is low. By regression, the collective relationship between stakeholder participation factors and VfM is statistically significant but weak, with only the inclusion level of stakeholders becoming a significant individual predictor. The research finds that stakeholder engagement leads to VfM improvement only when it is strategically incorporated into institutional structures, budgets, and accountability systems and suggests improving structured engagement mechanisms, capacity-building interventions, and standardized policy to increase the effectiveness of participatory M&E systems in local government authorities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Belcher, B. M., Bonaiuti, E., & Thiele, G. (2024). Applying theory of change in research program planning: Lessons from CGIAR. Environmental Science & Policy, 160, 103850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103850

Brest, P. (2010). The power of theories of change. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 8(2), 47-51. https://doi.org/10.48558/NPZS-C374

Edet, A. E., Gbahabo, T. P., & Osolafia, D. M. (2022). Institutionalizing monitoring and evaluation in the Nigerian electric power sector: Prospects and challenges. FUW Journal of Public Administration and Development, 16(1), 1-23. https://fuwjpd.com.ng/download-pdf-article/262

Inisha, L., & Elly, B. (2022). Establishing robust monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 13(4), 1-12. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3983946

Janus, H., & Keijzer, N. (2015). Big results now? Emerging lessons from results-based aid in Tanzania (Discussion Paper No. 4/2015). German Development Institute. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2673227

Kalolo, A., Gautier, L., Radermacher, R., Srivastava, S., Meshack, M., & De Allegri, M. (2021). Factors influencing variation in implementation outcomes of the redesigned community health fund in the Dodoma region of Tanzania: A mixed-methods study. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-10013-y

Martin, F. (2023). The influence of monitoring and evaluation on attaining value for money on public construction projects implemented through force account: A case of Ngorongoro District Council (Master's thesis, Institute of Accountancy Arusha). http://repository.iaa.ac.tz:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2256

Mathayo, R., & Kinyina, A. (2022). Monitoring and evaluation challenges and approaches by non-governmental organizations in Musoma, Tanzania. East African Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 3(4), 173-179. https://doi.org/10.4314/eajess.v3i4.209

Matto, M., Ame, A., & Nsimbila Kabelele, P. (2021). Tender process and value for money in Tanzania public procurement. International Journal of Logistics Economics and Globalisation, 9(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLEG.2021.10039481

Mayne, J., & Johnson, N. (2015). Using theories of change in the CGIAR research program on agriculture for nutrition and health. Evaluation, 21(4), 407-428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389015605198

Mgoba, S. A., & Kabote, S. J. (2020). Effectiveness of participatory monitoring and evaluation on achievement of community-based water projects in Tanzania. Applied Water Science, 10(8), 200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01273-5

Mukamwiza, R., Jean, K., & Hakizimana, D. D. (2021). Project implementation: A case of Global Help to Heal's project. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 11(7), 298-305. https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.11.07.2021.p11537

Ngumbela, X. G. (2024). The role of monitoring and evaluation as a quality control mechanism for effective governance: A South African local government perspective. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12(2), e3252. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i2.3252

Nguru, J. K., Kithinji, M., & Kirimi, D. (2025). Influence of monitoring and evaluation frameworks on the performance of projects within the parliamentary service commission of Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 12(3), 433-445. http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v12i3.3337

Nigel, S. (2019). Project monitoring and evaluation systems. M&E Training & Consultancy. https://www.intrac.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Project-ME-systems.pdf

Nigussie, E. (2022). Determinants of the effectiveness of monitoring and evaluation system in TVET projects implemented by selected NGOs in Addis Ababa (Master's thesis, St. Mary's University). http://repository.smuc.edu.et/handle/123456789/7249

Ohemeng, F. L. K., & Kamga, O. (2019). Administrative leaders as institutional entrepreneurs in developing countries: A study of the development and institutionalization of performance management in Ghana's public service. Public Administration and Development, 40(1), 87-100. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1867

Projahnmo, A. Q., & Heblinski, A. (2022). Influence of monitoring and evaluation on sustainability of donor funded projects in Afghanistan. Journal of Entrepreneurship & Project Management, 6(3), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t5061

Sullivan, H., & Stewart, M. (2006). Who owns the theory of change? Evaluation, 12(2), 179-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006066971

Wang, A., Song, Y., Wu, H., Ding, S., Yang, L., Yang, Y., & Iwahori, Y. (2022). Classroom teaching effect monitoring and evaluation system with deep integration of artificial intelligence. In Data science (pp. 337-350). Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5209-8_23

Weiss, C. H., & Connell, J. P. (1995). Nothing as practical as good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. In New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods, and contexts (pp. 65-92). The Aspen Institute. https://docs.opendeved.net/lib/2URBNM2X

Wilson, M. A., Bernard, O., & Wario, W. (2020). Effects of monitoring and evaluation framework on performance of public sector: A case of Ministry of Mining in Tanzania. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 3(8), 121-133.

Zwikael, O. (2024). Benefits classification to enhance project value creation. International Journal of Project Management, 42(2), 102574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102574