Ineffective by design? Systemic failures of performance management in a sub-Saharan African military establishment: The case of Zambia

Peter Leonard Daka

doi:10.51867/ajernet.7.2.78

Authors

Peter Leonard Daka Defence Sector of Zambia https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0540-5548

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.2.78

Keywords:

Defence Sector of Zambia, Institutional Isomorphism, Military Establishments, New Public Management, Performance Management System, Qualitative Case Study

Abstract

Performance Management Systems [PMS] emerged as a core instrument of New Public Management reform in Sub-Saharan Africa from the 1990s, yet their effectiveness in military establishments remains empirically underexamined. This qualitative case study evaluates the effectiveness of the PMS implemented in military establishments, with particular stress on the Military Training Establishment of Zambia. This is a major institution of the defence sector of Zambia in Kabwe. This evaluation was conducted twenty-two years after its introduction of PMS in 1998. The target population comprised the officer corps at MILTEZ. Purposive sampling was employed to select 23 key informants, comprising 14 wing commanders and 9 senior staff officers, across all six military training establishments of Zambia departments, on the basis of their direct involvement in goal-setting, performance appraisal, or reward administration. The data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews conducted between October 2018 and February 2019. The study applies reflexive thematic analysis to generate rich, contextualised insights into PMS effectiveness. The theoretical framework draws on four mainstream public administration theories: New Public Management Theory, Institutional Isomorphism, Principal-Agent Theory, and Accountability Theory. Four interrelated themes emerged: a goal-setting deficit characterised by unilateral formulation and resource inadequacy; a trait-performance Disconnect, in which the appraisal instrument evaluates personal characteristics rather than goal achievement; a Reward Administration Failure driven by opacity and perceived nepotism; and a Systemic Institutional Mismatch generated by the uncritical adoption of civilian performance management systems frameworks in a hierarchical military context. The study concludes that Performance Management Systems’ ineffectiveness at the Military Training Establishment of Zambia is systemic, rooted in mimetic isomorphism, and proposes a military-adapted PMS reform framework responsive to the institutional realities of Sub-Saharan African military organisations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahyaruddin, M., Yusoff, M. N. H. B., & Zainuddin, S. A. B. (2023). Institutional isomorphism, accountability, and local government performance in the era of public governance: A conceptual framework. In N. Mansour & L. M. Bujosa Vadell (Eds.), Finance, accounting and law in the digital age: Contributions to management science (pp. 57-78). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27296-7_57

Bernard, H. R. (2002). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (3rd ed.). AltaMira Press.

Bjurstrøm, K. H. (2020). Principal-agent or principal-steward: How ministry-agency relations condition the impact of performance management in the steering of government agencies. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(6), 1287-1315. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1739087

Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447-468.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Chidwala, J. J. (2013). Implementation of the performance management policy of the Malawi Civil Service (Unpublished master's thesis). University of the Witwatersrand.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organisational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003

Fatile, J. O. (2014). Performance management systems and productivity in the public sector: Whither African public administration. Journal of Business and Management, 16(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.4102/apsdpr.v2i3.60

Funck, E. K., & Karlsson, T. S. (2020). Twenty-five years of studying new public management in public administration: Accomplishments and limitations. Financial Accountability & Management, 36(4), 347-363. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12214

Government of the Republic of Zambia, Ministry of Defence. (2016). Ministry of Defence annual report. Ministry of Defence.

Hambissa, B. A., Tadesse, W. M., & Regassa, G. A. (2023). Public sector performance management: The shift from annual performance review to regular feedback. Social Sciences and Education Research Review, 10(1), 212-217. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8151121

Hangula, S. S. (2010). An investigation of the implementation of performance appraisal in the Namibia Defence Force: A case study of the Grootfontein Garrison (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Namibia.

Haque, M. S. (2012). Appraisal of civil servants in Bangladesh: A theoretical framework. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(4), 281-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.646078

Heinrich, C. J. (2002). Outcomes-based performance management in the public sector: Implications for government accountability and effectiveness. Public Administration Review, 62(6), 712-725. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00252

Hinson, R. E., Madichie, N., Adeola, O., Nyigmah Bawole, J., Adisa, I., & Asamoah, K. (2022). The new public management and the way forward in Africa. In R. E. Hinson, N. Madichie, O. Adeola, J. Nyigmah Bawole, I. Adisa, & K. Asamoah (Eds.), New public management in Africa: Palgrave studies of public sector management in Africa (pp. 1-24). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77181-2_13

Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x

Kamfwa, E. (2016). Effectiveness of the annual performance appraisal system in the Zambian civil service (Unpublished MPA dissertation). University of Zambia.

Kanchebele, S. (2012). Institutionalisation of annual performance appraisal systems in Zambia's public service (Unpublished MPA dissertation). University of Zambia.

Lapsley, I., & Miller, P. (Eds.). (2024). The resilience of new public management. Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198883814.001.0001

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

Makambwe, H. (2001). Assessment of the implementation of the performance management package in the Zambia public service (Unpublished MPA dissertation). University of Zambia.

Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching (2nd ed.). Sage.

Mate, E. (2006). Evaluation of the performance management package in the Zambia Police Service (Unpublished MPA dissertation). University of Zambia.

Matlala, M. (2011). Employee perceptions of the fairness of the performance management system in the South African public service (Unpublished MPA dissertation). University of Pretoria.

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.

Molefhi, O. (2015). Staff members' perceptions on the challenges of PMS implementation in junior secondary schools in Botswana (Unpublished MPA dissertation). University of Botswana.

Moodley, A., Ackers, B., & Odendaal, E. (2022). Factors inhibiting effective organisational performance management: Insights from the South African public sector. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 18(1), 1-27.

https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAAPE.2022.123297

Pandey, S. K., & Rainey, H. G. (2006). Public managers' perceptions of organizational goal ambiguity: Analyzing alternative models. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 397-421. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui048

Rajala, T. (2025). Beyond simplification in public sector accountability: Contradictions between principal-agent and complexity theories. Public Administration Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13941

Roberts, G. E. (1998). Perspectives on enduring and emerging issues in performance appraisal. Public Personnel Management, 27(3), 301-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102609802700304

Romzek, B. S., & Dubnick, M. J. (1987). Accountability in the public sector: Lessons from the Challenger tragedy. Public Administration Review, 47(3), 227-238. https://doi.org/10.2307/975895

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.

Waterman, R. W., & Meier, K. J. (1998). Principal-agent models: An expansion? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 173-202. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024373

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage.

Zvavahera, P. (2014). An evaluation of the effectiveness of the results-based management system in the civil service of Zimbabwe. Journal of Management and Administration, 2(1), 1-15.