Green consumer behaviour among individuals in the low-income rural demographic in Zambia: A subsistence – sustainability paradox (SSP)

https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.1.109

Authors

Keywords:

Base-of-Pyramid, Environmental Justice, Green Consumer Behaviour, Poverty and Consumption, Rural Zambia, Theory of Planned Behaviour

Abstract

This study was guided by the Subsistence-Sustainability Paradox (SSP), a framework that applies behavioural theory to situations of scarcity. The SSP shows that households in low-income rural areas often prioritise immediate survival needs over sustainability goals. This is not due to indifference but is a rational response to ongoing poverty and ecological risks. By connecting consumer behaviour to structural inequalities and cultural influences, the study adds to discussions about the limits of what is possible in times of scarcity and the need for sustainability models that consider local contexts. The research used a qualitative phenomenological design, which is effective in capturing real experiences and the meanings that participants give to their environmental practices. The target population included individuals from rural Kabwe, specifically Muwowo, Kang’omba, and Kamakuti, who faced economic difficulties and were directly impacted by climate uncertainty between 2023 and 2024. Using purposive sampling, 27 participants were selected based on their involvement in resource-dependent activities, awareness of ecological issues, and willingness to share adaptive strategies. The sample consisted of 19 individuals who were interviewed in depth and 8 participants who joined focus group discussions, ensuring that both individual and group viewpoints were included. Data collection used a multi-method approach, which involved semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and non-participant observations over four months. Interviews offered detailed accounts of consumption habits, traditional practices, and cultural norms. Focus groups encouraged discussions that uncovered shared values, conflicts, and community-led resilience strategies. Observations recorded real-life actions such as reusing resources, traditional farming techniques, and community coping methods, providing an objective addition to self-reported data. Data analysis followed Van Manen’s hermeneutic-phenomenological method, using structured coding and thematic grouping to interpret participants’ experiences. NVivo software was used to ensure clarity and reliability in identifying themes related to affordability, cultural continuity, awareness gaps, and Indigenous resilience. The findings revealed four main themes: affordability as the key driver of consumption; cultural continuity supporting traditional practices; a gap between awareness and action in which ecological knowledge does not lead to behaviour change; and adaptive creativity shown through indigenous resilience and frugal innovation. These themes demonstrate how factors such as cost, tradition, knowledge, and resilience interact with green consumer behaviour within contexts of scarcity. The study concludes that feasibility thresholds, rather than attitudes or norms, are the main factors determining sustainable actions in low-income rural households. It suggests policies that promote frugality and indigenous resilience through subsidies, microfinance, and culturally relevant education. By framing the lack of typical green practices as logical responses to survival needs, the research enhances discussions around sustainability by linking poverty reduction with ecological care and emphasising environmental justice.

Dimensions

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Aladejare, S. A., & Musa, M. A. (2024). Does rising resource income, consumer prices, government outlay, and globalization hinder Africa's sustainable development? International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 23(1), 37-62.

https://doi.org/10.1386/tmsd_00084_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/tmsd_00084_1

Bratu, S. (2017). Is green consumerism really an environmentally conscious behaviour? Geopolitics, History, and International Relations, 9(1), 167-173. https://doi.org/10.22381/GHIR9220178 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22381/GHIR9220178

Bullard, R. D. (1990). Dumping in Dixie: Race, class, and environmental quality. Westview Press.

Chikweche, T., Lappeman, J., & Egan, P. (2023). Researching the marginalised bottom of the pyramid in Africa: Lessons and prospects for inclusive, relevant practices. International Journal of Market Research, 65(5), 597-621. https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853221147190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853221147190

Cooper, R. D., & Schindler, P. S. (2011). Business research methods (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Cozby, P. C., & Bates, S. C. (2012). Methods in behavioral research (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

de Bandt, O., Jacolin, L., & Lemaire, T. (2021). Climate change in developing countries: Global warming effects, transmission channels, and adaptation policies (Working Paper No. 822). Banque de France.

Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Farias, R., & Farias, F. (2010). Cycles of poverty and consumption: The sustainability dilemma. Journal of Sustainability Studies, 12(4), 248-260.

https://doi.org/10.1108/10595421011047433 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10595421011047433

McDonald, S., Oates, C. J., Thyne, M., Timmis, A. J., & Carlile, C. (2015). Flying in the face of environmental concern: Why green consumers continue to fly. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(13-14), 1503-1528. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1059352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1059352

Moleka, P. (2024). Frugal innovation for inclusive and sustainable development in Africa. Advanced Research in Economics and Business Strategy Journal, 5(1), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.52919/arebus.v5i1.58 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52919/arebus.v5i1.58

Mustafa, M., Zafar, A., & Yasmeen, M. (2022). Role of eco-friendly products in the revival of developing countries' economies and achieving a sustainable green economy. Environmental Sustainability, 5(1), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.955245 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.955245

Mvula, D., Mulenga, P., & Lisomona, M. (2024). Environmental sustainability in Zambia: Where are we?

https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202407.2422.v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202407.2422.v1

O'Hare, P. (1991). Low-income and resource management. Rural Sociology, 56(4), 509-525.

Ottman, J. A. (1994). Green marketing: Challenges and opportunities for the new marketing era. Makron Books.

Oxfam International. (2022). Environmental justice and vulnerable communities. Oxfam.

Prahalad, C. K., & Hart, S. L. (2002). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Strategy+Business, 26, 2-14.

Salvia, A. L., Leal Filho, W., Brandli, L., & Griebeler, J. S. (2019). Assessing research trends related to sustainable development goals: Local and global issues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 841-849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.242

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson.

Thøgersen, J. (2021). Consumer behaviour and climate change: Consumers need considerable assistance. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42, 9-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.008

Tian, X., Zhang, Q., Chi, Y., & Cheng, Y. (2021). Purchase willingness of new green products: An empirical study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, Article 124-135.

Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action-sensitive pedagogy. SUNY Press.

Van Manen, M. (2017). Phenomenology in its original sense. Qualitative Health Research, 27(6), 810-825.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317699381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317699381

World Bank. (2024). Poverty and climate vulnerability reports. World Bank.

World Bank. (2025). Poverty and climate vulnerability reports. World Bank.

Xu, Y., Du, J., Khan, M. A. S., Jin, S., Altaf, M., Anwar, F., & Sharif, I. (2022). Effects of subjective norms and environmental mechanisms on green purchase behaviour: An extended model of the theory of planned behaviour. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 779629.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.779629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.779629

Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2017). Determinants of consumers' green purchase behaviour in a developing nation: Applying and extending the theory of planned behaviour. Ecological Economics, 134, 114-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.019

Yasmeen, R., Li, Y., Hafeez, M., & Ahmad, H. (2018). The trade-environment nexus in light of governance: A global perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(34), 34360-34379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3390-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3390-3

Zafar, A., Ullah, S., Majeed, M. T., & Yasmeen, R. (2020). Environmental pollution in Asian economies: Does industrialisation matter? OPEC Energy Review, 44(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/opec.12181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/opec.12181

Zhang, L., Fan, Y., Zhang, W., & Zhang, S. (2019). Extending the theory of planned behaviour to explain the effects of cognitive factors across different kinds of green products. Sustainability, 11(15), 4222. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154222 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154222

Zhao, G., Cavusgil, E., & Zhao, Y. (2016). A protection motivation explanation of base-of-pyramid consumers' environmental sustainability. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 116-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.12.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.12.003

Published

2026-03-18

How to Cite

Longwe, B., & Mwange, A. (2026). Green consumer behaviour among individuals in the low-income rural demographic in Zambia: A subsistence – sustainability paradox (SSP). African Journal of Empirical Research, 7(1), 1286–1294. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.1.109