Artificial intelligence in investment decision-making: A senior management perception among commercial banks in Kenya

https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.1.57

Authors

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Banking, Commercial Banks, Investment Decisions, Senior Management Perception

Abstract

The banking sector is being significantly reshaped by the rapid introduction and application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the investment decision-making processes of commercial banks. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to analyze perceptions of AI in investment decision-making by senior management in commercial banks in Kenya. The study was anchored by rational decision-making theory, bounded rationality theory, intuitive decision-making theory, heuristic decision-making theory, and the technology acceptance model. The mixed-methods approach was utilized in the study and survey and in-depth interviews with senior management of commercial banks, with secondary information drawn from industry sources. The target population was the senior managers in the investment department in all the thirty-nine commercial banks in Nairobi City. The study adopted a census approach in all the thirty-nine commercial banks. AI applications allow commercial banks to streamline their workflows and improve the ability to forecast true business health, enabling decision-making based on quality data. AI adoption leads to minimized operational risks and dynamic adaptation of investment strategies due to market changes. The study employed a mixed-methods approach to explore the possibilities of AI, the challenges of AI, and the possibilities of applying AI in the banking sector. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 25 for descriptive and inferential statistics. The results show significant positive correlations: leadership commitment with organizational culture (r=0.65, p<0.01), resource availability with leadership (r=0.58, p<0.01), and organizational flexibility (r=0.62, p<0.01). Employee attitudes are positively correlated with leadership (r=0.52, p<0.01) and culture (r=0.55, p<0.01), while perceptions of AI risks are negatively correlated with leadership (r=-0.45, p<0.01). The regression model explains 61% of perception variance (R²=0.61), with leadership showing the strongest influence (β=0.33, p<0.01), followed by culture (β=0.28, p<0.01), resource availability (β=0.22, p<0.01), and employee attitudes (β=0.17, p=0.018). Perceived risks negatively impact perceptions (β=-0.14, p=0.022). The model’s F-statistic is 18.2 (p<0.001), indicating overall significance and emphasizing the importance of organizational support in AI adoption. The report provides actionable recommendations, including augmented AI training programs, investing in AI with high scalability, and developing transparent frameworks for regulating AI in a way that will promote AI use in Kenya’s banking sector. This will enhance the efficiency, accuracy, and optimization of financial decisions. Findings from this study can be used in the formulation of policy issues on the development of AI-specific regulations and guidelines for the prudent use of AI technologies in the financial services industry in evaluating their present investment decision-making, thus contributing to SDG 9 on industry innovation and infrastructure.

Dimensions

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). The business of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Review, 7, 3-11. https://starlab-alliance.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/The-Business-of-Artificial-Intelligence.pdf

Familoni, B. T., & Shoetan, P. O. (2024). Cybersecurity in the financial sector: A comparative analysis of the USA and Nigeria. Computer Science & IT Research Journal, 5, 850-877. https://doi.org/10.51594/csitrj.v5i4.1046 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51594/csitrj.v5i4.1046

Field, A. P. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage.

Gregory, J., & Sovacool, B. K. (2019). The financial risks and barriers to electricity infrastructure in Kenya, Tanzania, and Mozambique: A critical and systematic review of the academic literature. Energy Policy, 125, 145-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.026

Haidari, M. N. (2023). Impact of decision-making on investment performance: A comprehensive analysis. Psychometric Journal, 12(4), 980-990. https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2023.12.4.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2023.12.4.78

Han, Y., Chen, J., Dou, M., Wang, J., & Feng, K. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence on the financial services industry. Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 2(3), 83-85. https://doi.org/10.54097/ajmss.v2i3.8741 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/ajmss.v2i3.8741

Huang, A. H., & You, H. (2023). Artificial intelligence in financial decision-making. In Handbook of artificial intelligence and financial decision-making (Chap. 15). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/book/9781802204179/book-part-9781802204179-29.xml

https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802204179.00029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802204179.00029

Königstorfer, F., & Thalmann, S. (2020). Applications of artificial intelligence in commercial banks - A research agenda for behavioral finance. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 27, Article 100352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100352

Kowalkiewicz, M. (2024). The economy of algorithms: AI and the rise of the digital minions. Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.10354686 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56687/9781529242485

Kumar, S., Gupta, U., Singh, A. K., & Singh, A. K. (2023). Artificial intelligence. Journal of Computers, Mechanical and Management, 2, 31-42. https://doi.org/10.57159/gadl.jcmm.2.3.23064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.57159/gadl.jcmm.2.3.23064

Luan, S., Reb, J., & Gigerenzer, G. (2019). Ecological rationality: Fast-and-frugal heuristics for managerial decision making under uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 62(6), 1735-1759. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0172

March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1980). The theory of organizational equilibrium. In A. Etzioni & E. W. Lehman (Eds.), A sociological reader on complex organizations (pp. 16-21). Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Merendino, A., Dibb, S., Meadows, M., Quinn, L., Wilson, D., Simkin, L., & Canhoto, A. (2018). Big data, big decisions: The impact of big data on board level decision-making. Journal of Business Research, 93, 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.029

Mishra, A. K., Anand, S., Debnath, N. C., Pokhariyal, P., & Patel, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence for risk mitigation in the financial industry. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394175574 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394175574

Remmers, C., Topolinski, S., Buxton, A., Dietrich, D. E., & Michalak, J. (2017). The beneficial and detrimental effects of major depression on intuitive decision-making. Cognition and Emotion, 31(4), 799-805. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1154817 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1154817

Shoetan, P. O., & Familoni, B. T. (2024). Transforming fintech fraud detection with advanced artificial intelligence algorithms. Finance & Accounting Research Journal, 6(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.51594/farj.v6i4.1036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51594/farj.v6i4.1036

Simon, H. A. (1979). Rational decision making in business organizations. American Economic Review, 69(4), 493-512.

Stewart, H., & Jürjens, J. (2017). Information security management and the human aspect in organizations. Information & Computer Security, 25(5), 494-534. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-07-2016-0054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-07-2016-0054

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

Uzonwanne, F. C. (2016). Rational model of decision making. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2474-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2474-1

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal studies. Management Science, 46, 186-205. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Published

2026-02-21

How to Cite

Mucembi, M., & Munene, R. (2026). Artificial intelligence in investment decision-making: A senior management perception among commercial banks in Kenya. African Journal of Empirical Research, 7(1), 661–671. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.1.57