Digital technologies in the lifeworld of smallholder farmers: A hermeneutic phenomenological critique of adoption-centric digital agriculture research

https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.1.63

Authors

  • Musaka Mulanga Chikobola The University of Zambia, Graduate School of Business, Lusaka, Zambia https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2200-1404
  • Chabala Chitembo Malyangu The University of Zambia, Graduate School of Business, Lusaka, Zambia
  • David Banda The University of Zambia, Institute of Distance Education, Lusaka, Zambia
  • Musowe Nsakilwa The University of Zambia, School of Agricultural Sciences, Lusaka, Zambia

Keywords:

Digital Agriculture, Hermeneutic Phenomenology, Lifeworld, Smallholder Farmers, Sub-Saharan Africa, Technology Adoption

Abstract

Digital agricultural technologies are increasingly promoted as solutions to the challenges confronting smallholder farming, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa. However, much of the research in this field remains anchored in adoption-centric frameworks that conceptualise technology use as a rational and measurable decision shaped by factors such as perceived usefulness and ease of use. While these models have generated valuable empirical findings, they provide only a partial account of how farmers encounter and live with digital tools in everyday practice. This paper critically interrogates the conceptual and ontological assumptions embedded within adoption-centric research. Drawing on hermeneutic phenomenology, the study reorients analysis toward farmers’ lived experience, everyday practice, and processes of meaning-making. Rather than presenting new empirical fieldwork, the study undertakes a critical interpretive synthesis of global and African digital agriculture scholarship. This literature is read through phenomenological theory to illuminate dimensions of engagement that remain underexplored. The analysis shows that adoption-centric frameworks marginalise key dimensions of digital engagement, including temporality, embodiment, intersubjectivity, language, historical memory, and infrastructural instability. In practice, farmers’ engagement with digital technologies is often negotiated, intermittent, and shaped by shifting social and material conditions. Technologies may be adopted, adapted, reinterpreted, or abandoned in ways that exceed explanation through behavioural intention alone. Digital tools are not neutral instruments but acquire meaning within specific social and material lifeworld contexts. Understanding digital agriculture, therefore, requires moving beyond the question of adoption toward exploring how digital technologies are experienced within everyday farming life. By foregrounding lived experience, this paper contributes to debates on the limits of adoption-centric approaches in agricultural research and rural development and argues that phenomenologically informed inquiry can complement quantitative adoption studies while supporting more context-sensitive policy, design, and intervention strategies.

Dimensions

Abate, G. T., Abay, K. A., Chamberlin, J., Kassim, Y., Spielman, D. J., & Tabe-Ojong, M. P. J. (2023). Digital tools and agricultural market transformation in Africa: Why are they not at scale yet, and what will it take to get there? Food Policy, 116, Article 102439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102439

Abioye, D. O., Popoola, O., Akande, A., Fadare, D. A., Omitoyin, S. A., Yinusa, B., & Kolade, O. O. (2024). Farmers' willingness to adopt digital application tools in Ogun State, Nigeria. Journal of Strategy and Management, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-06-2023-0135 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-06-2023-0135

African Union. (2025, December 4). AU organises inaugural digital agriculture conference to boost food security and agri-food systems in advancing the AU Agenda 2063 vision through agri-tech [Press release]. https://au.int/sites/default/files/pressreleases/45740-pr-PR_Digital_Agriculture_Conference_fin.pdf

Ajjawi, R., & Higgs, J. (2007). Using hermeneutic phenomenology to investigate how experienced practitioners learn to communicate clinical reasoning. The Qualitative Report, 12(4), 612-638. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol12/iss4/6

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Aker, J. C., Ghosh, I., & Burrell, J. (2016). The promise (and pitfalls) of ICT for agriculture initiatives. Agricultural Economics, 47(S1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12301

Alsaigh, R., & Coyne, I. (2021). Doing a hermeneutic phenomenology research underpinned by Gadamer's philosophy: A framework to facilitate data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211047820 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211047820

Baumüller, H. (2018). The little we know: An exploratory literature review on the utility of mobile phone-enabled services for smallholder farmers. Journal of International Development, 30(1), 134-154. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3314

Bronson, K. (2019). Looking through a responsible innovation lens at uneven engagements with digital farming. NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90-91(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2019.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2019.03.001

Burrell, J., & Oreglia, E. (2015). The myth of market price information: Mobile phones and the application of economic knowledge in ICTD. Economy and Society, 44(2), 271-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2015.1013742 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2015.1013742

Choruma, D. J., Dirwai, T. L., Mutenje, M., Mustafa, M., Chimonyo, V. G. P., Jacobs-Mata, I., & Mabhaudhi, T. (2024). Digitalisation in agriculture: A scoping review of technologies in practice, challenges, and opportunities for smallholder farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 18, Article 101286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101286 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101286

Conroy, S. A. (2003). A pathway for interpretive phenomenology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(3), 36-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690300200304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690300200304

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Eweoya, I., Okuboyejo, S. R., Odetunmibi, O. A., & Odusote, B. O. (2021). An empirical investigation of acceptance, adoption and the use of E-agriculture in Nigeria. Heliyon, 7(7), Article e07588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07588 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07588

FAO. (2024). The state of food and agriculture 2024 - Value-driven transformation of agrifood systems. https://doi.org/10.4060/cd2616en DOI: https://doi.org/10.4060/cd2616en

Gadamer, H. G. (1989). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.; 2nd Revised ed.). Crossroad. (Original work published 1960)

Geng, W., Liu, L., Zhao, J., Kang, X., & Wang, W. (2024). Digital technologies adoption and economic benefits in agriculture: A mixed-methods approach. Sustainability, 16(11), Article 4431. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114431 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114431

Glover, D., Sumberg, J., Ton, G., Andersson, J., & Badstue, L. (2019). Rethinking technological change in smallholder agriculture. Outlook on Agriculture, 48(3), 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727019864978 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727019864978

Glover, D., Venot, J.-P., & Maat, H. (2017). On the movement of agricultural technologies: Packaging, unpacking and situated reconfiguration. In J. Sumberg (Ed.), Agronomy for development: The politics of knowledge in agricultural research (1st ed., pp. 14-30). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315284057-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315284057-2

GSMA. (2024). Driving digitalisation of the economy in Zambia: Leveraging policy reforms [Report]. https://www.gsma.com/about-us/regions/sub-saharan-africa/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/GSMA_Zambia-Report_Oct-2024_Final.pdf

Gumbi, N., Gumbi, L., & Twinomurinzi, H. (2023). Towards sustainable digital agriculture for smallholder farmers: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 15(16), Article 12530. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612530 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612530

Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and time (J. Stambaugh, Trans.; 7th ed.). State University of New York Press. (Original work published 1927)

Hinson, R., Lensink, R., & Mueller, A. (2019). Transforming agribusiness in developing countries: SDGs and the role of FinTech. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 41, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.07.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.07.002

Ingram, J., & Maye, D. (2020). What are the implications of digitalisation for agricultural knowledge? Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4, Article 66.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00066

Klerkx, L., & Rose, D. (2020). Dealing with the game-changing technologies of Agriculture 4.0: How do we manage diversity and responsibility in food system transition pathways? Global Food Security, 24, Article 100347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100347 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100347

Klerkx, L., Jakku, E., & Labarthe, P. (2019). A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: New contributions and a future research agenda. NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90-91(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2019.100315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2019.100315

Kudama, G., Dangia, M., Wana, H., & Tadese, B. (2021). Will digital solution transform Sub-Sahara African agriculture? Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture, 5, 292-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiia.2021.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiia.2021.12.001

Laverty, S. M. (2003). Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of historical and methodological considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(3), 21-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690300200303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690300200303

McCampbell, M., Adewopo, J., Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2021). Are farmers ready to use phone-based digital tools for agronomic advice? Ex-ante user readiness assessment using the case of Rwandan banana farmers. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 29(1), 29-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224x.2021.1984955 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2021.1984955

Mishra, N., Bhandari, N., Maraseni, T., Devkota, N., Khanal, G., Bhusal, B., Basyal, D. K., Paudel, U. R., & Danuwar, R. K. (2024). Technology in farming: Unleashing farmers' behavioral intention for the adoption of agriculture 5.0. PLOS ONE, 19(8), Article e0308883. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308883 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308883

Mohr, S., & Kühl, R. (2021). Acceptance of artificial intelligence in German agriculture: An application of the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior. Precision Agriculture, 22(6), 1816-1844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-021-09814-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-021-09814-x

Mulungu, K., Kassie, M., & Tschopp, M. (2025). The role of information and communication technologies-based extension in agriculture: application, opportunities and challenges. Information Technology for Development, 31(4), 1117-1146. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2025.2456232 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2025.2456232

Niedbała, G., Kujawa, S., Piekutowska, M., & Wojciechowski, T. (2024). Exploring digital innovations in agriculture: A pathway to sustainable food production and resource management. Agriculture, 14(9), Article 1630.

https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14091630 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14091630

Okwatch, D. (2024). Laying foundation for digital revolution in Africa's food systems [Webpage]. Africa Renewal. United Nations. Retrieved January 30, 2025, from https://africarenewal.un.org/en/magazine/laying-foundation-digital-revolution-africas-food-systems

Omulo, G., & Kumeh, E. M. (2020). Farmer-to-farmer digital network as a strategy to strengthen agricultural performance in Kenya: A research note on 'Wefarm' platform. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 158, Article 120120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120120

Pratiwi, A., & Suzuki, A. (2017). Effects of farmers' social networks on knowledge acquisition: Lessons from agricultural training in rural Indonesia. Journal of Economic Structures, 6(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-017-0069-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-017-0069-8

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. (Original work published 1962)

Rose, D. C., Parker, C., Fodery, J., Park, C., Sutherland, W. J., & Dicks, L. V. (2018). Involving stakeholders in agricultural decision support systems: Improving user-centred design. International Journal of Agricultural Management, 6, 80-89. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.287292

Rose, D. C., Wheeler, R., Winter, M., Lobley, M., & Chivers, C.-A. (2021). Agriculture 4.0: Making it work for people, production, and the planet. Land Use Policy, 100, Article 104933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104933 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104933

Rotz, S., Gravely, E., Mosby, I., Duncan, E., Finnis, E., Horgan, M., LeBlanc, J., Martin, R., Neufeld, H. T., & Nixon, A. (2019). Automated pastures and the digital divide: How agricultural technologies are shaping labour and rural communities. Journal of Rural Studies, 68, 112-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.01.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.01.023

Schutz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world (G. Walsh & F. Lehnert, Trans.). Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1932)

Smidt, H. J., & Jokonya, O. (2022). Factors affecting digital technology adoption by small-scale farmers in agriculture value chains (AVCs) in South Africa. Information Technology for Development, 28(3), 558-584. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2021.1975256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2021.1975256

Steinke, J., Van Etten, J., Müller, A., Ortiz-Crespo, B., Van De Gevel, J., Silvestri, S., & Priebe, J. (2021). Tapping the full potential of the digital revolution for agricultural extension: An emerging innovation agenda. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 19(5-6), 549-565. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2020.1738754 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2020.1738754

Šūmane, S., Kunda, I., Knickel, K., Strauss, A., Tisenkopfs, T., des Ios Rios, I., Rivera, M., Chebach, T., & Ashkenazy, A. (2018). Local and farmers' knowledge matters! How integrating informal and formal knowledge enhances sustainable and resilient agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies, 59, 232-241.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.01.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.01.020

Tabe-Ojong, M. P., Jr., Abate, G. T., Abay, K. A., & Spielman, D. J. (2023). Digital innovations and agricultural transformation in Africa: Lessons from Kenya. In C. Breisinger, M. Keenan, J. Mbuthia, & J. Njuki (Eds.), Food systems transformation in Kenya: Lessons from the past and policy options for the future (pp. 469-492). International Food Policy Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.2499/9780896294561_18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2499/9780896294561_18

Thomas, E., Riley, M., & Spees, J. (2020). Knowledge flows: Farmers' social relations and knowledge sharing practices in 'Catchment Sensitive Farming'. Land Use Policy, 90, Article 104254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104254 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104254

van Manen, M. (2023). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003228073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003228073

World Bank. (2021). What's cooking: Digital transformation of the agrifood system [Report]. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1657-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1657-4

Zhang, X., Yang, Q., Al Mamun, A., Masukujjaman, M., & Masud, M. M. (2024). Acceptance of new agricultural technology among small rural farmers. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04163-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04163-2

Zondo, W. N. S., & Ndoro, J. T. (2023). Attributes of Diffusion of Innovation's influence on smallholder farmers' social media adoption in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. Sustainability, 15(5), 4017.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054017

Published

2026-02-25

How to Cite

Chikobola, M. M., Malyangu, C. C., Banda, D., & Nsakilwa, M. (2026). Digital technologies in the lifeworld of smallholder farmers: A hermeneutic phenomenological critique of adoption-centric digital agriculture research. African Journal of Empirical Research, 7(1), 730–741. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.1.63

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Jan-Mar 2026

Section

Articles
Copyright & Licensing

Copyright (c) 2026 Musaka Mulanga Chikobola, Chabala Chitembo Malyangu, David Banda, Musowe Nsakilwa

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC