Level of community collaboration in the implementation of wildlife conservation and management policy in King’wal Wildlife Conservancy, Nandi County, Kenya

Josphat K. Koech; Edmond M.  Were; Daniel Rotich Kandagor

doi:10.51867/ajernet.7.1.18

Authors

Josphat K. Koech
josphatkoech52@gmail.com
Kisii University, Kenya https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6738-6983
Edmond M. Were Kisii University, Kenya https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1466-6682
Daniel Rotich Kandagor Kisii University, Kenya https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3479-8236

Keywords:

Community Collaboration, Conservancy, Policy Implementation, Rational Choice, Wildlife Management

Abstract

This paper examined the extent of community collaboration in the implementation of Kenya’s Wildlife Management Policy in King’wal Wildlife Conservancy in Nandi County, Kenya. It was guided by the Rational Choice Theory. The paper adopted a descriptive survey research design in which both a structured questionnaire and interview schedule were used to gather information from the sampled respondents. The target population comprised assistant chiefs, village elders, conservation administrators, Non-Governmental Organizations [NGOs] chairpersons, and households, consisting of 855 people. A sample of 273 respondents was selected using the stratified sampling technique. Frequencies, means, and percentages were used to analyze the data and to describe and summarize the findings in terms of descriptive statistics. There was a pre-testing to improve the validity and reliability of the research instruments. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze quantitative data, and open-ended responses and interviews were analyzed qualitatively with the use of thematic analysis and identifying the emerging patterns. The results revealed that community cooperation had a significant impact on policy enactment. The unstandardized coefficient (B) of a community collaboration was 0.567, and the standard error was 0.084, which means that a one-unit rise in community collaboration led to a rise in the implementation of the Wildlife Management Policy by 0.567 units, holding other variables steady. This means that an increasing degree of cooperation is linked with more efficient implementation of policies. The research established that the extent of community participation in wildlife management at King’wal Wildlife Conservancy was moderate, implying the existence of gaps in information sharing and representation. Based on the results and findings of this research, it is suggested that the conservation authorities ought to design more effective communication strategies in order to ensure that information regarding the management of wildlife policies is made available to all the segments of the community.

Dimensions

REFERENCES

Agduma, A. R., Garcia, F. G., Cabasan, M. T., Pimentel, J., Ele, R. J., Rubio, M., Murray, S., Hilario-Husain, B. A., Dela Cruz, K. C., Abdullah, S., Balase, S. M., & Tanalgo, K. C. (2023). Overview of priorities, threats, and challenges to biodiversity conservation in the southern Philippines. Regional Sustainability, 4(2), 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsus.2023.05.003

Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169-217. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1830482

https://doi.org/10.1086/259394

Biwott, I. K., Were, E. M., & Oino, P. G. (2024). Policy implementation framework and partnership for the management of riparian zones: A case of River King'wal, Kenya. African Journal of Empirical Research, 5(3), 871-885. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajempr/article/view/286497

https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.5.3.74

Broome, N. P., & Kothari, A. (1998). Sharing benefits of wildlife conservation with local communities: Legal implications. Economic and Political Weekly, 33(40), 2603-2610. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299239817_Sharing_benefits_of_wildlife_conservation_with_local_communities_-_Legal_implications

Bujang, M. A., Omar, E. D., Foo, D. H. P., & Hon, Y. K. (2024). Sample size determination for conducting a pilot study to assess reliability of a questionnaire. Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 49(1), e3. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2024.49.e3

Daugstad, K., Svarstad, H., & Vistad, O. I. (2025). Community-based nature protection: Lessons from Norway. International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability, 2(3), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.18848/1832-2077/CGP/v02i03/54201

Eckerdal, J., & Hagström, C. (2017). Qualitative questionnaires as a method for information studies research. Information Research, 22(1), 45-49. http://www.informationr.net/ir/22-1/colis/colis1639.html

Fariss, B., DeMello, N., Powlen, K. A., Latimer, C. E., Masuda, Y., & Kennedy, C. M. (2022). Catalyzing success in community-based conservation. Conservation Biology, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13973

Gayo, L. (2025). Community-based conserved areas in advancing sustainable development and conservation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Discover Conservation, 2, 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44353-025-00047-x

Ghimire, K. B., & Pimbert, M. P. (1997). Social change and conservation: Environmental politics and impacts of national parks and protected areas. Earthscan. https://archive.org/details/socialchangecons0000unse

Goswami, D. (2024). Addressing the challenge of overexploitation of natural resources in pursuit of development. Spring Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(3), 65-67. https://doi.org/10.55559/sjahss.v3i3.276

Herzog, M. (2008). Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 31(2), 180-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20247

Infield, M., & Mugisha, A. (2013). Culture, values, and conservation: A review of perspectives, policies, and practices for the integration of cultural and ethical values into conservation. Fauna & Flora International, 5(3), 68-69. https://www.fauna-flora.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/FFI_2013_Cultural-Values-Review.pdf

Kipkeu, M. L., Mwangi, S. W., & Njogu, J. (2014). Community participation in wildlife conservation in Amboseli Ecosystem, Kenya. Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology, 8(4), 68-75. https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jestft/papers/vol8-issue4/Version-2/K08426875.pdf

https://doi.org/10.9790/2402-08426875

Lesorogol, C., & Lesorogol, P. (2024). Community-based wildlife conservation on pastoral lands in Kenya: A new logic of production with implications for the future of pastoralism. Human Ecology, 52(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-024-00482-9

Matloga, S. T., Mahole, E., & Nekhavhambe, M. M. (2024). Challenges of public participation in improving basic service delivery in Vhembe District Municipality, Limpopo, South Africa. Journal of Local Government Research and Innovation, 5. https://jolgri.org/index.php/jolgri/article/view/160/370

https://doi.org/10.4102/jolgri.v5i0.160

Ocholla, G. O., Mireri, C., & Muoria, P. K. (2016). Application of indigenous knowledge systems in wildlife management: A case study of the Samburu pastoral community in Kenya. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 6(1), 72-80.

Otianga-Owiti, G. E., Okori, J. J. L., Nyamasyo, S., & Amwata, D. A. (2021). Governance and challenges of wildlife conservation and management in Kenya. In S. C. Underkoffler & H. R. Adams (Eds.), Wildlife biodiversity conservation. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64682-0_4

Paavola, J. (2015). Multi-level environmental governance: Exploring the economic explanations. Environmental Policy and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1698

Pawan, N., Rajan, A., Poonia, A., & Vernia, P. (2026). Collaborative approaches to wildlife conservation. In Wildlife trade in India (pp. 371-398). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-3694-8_17

Rodriguez, F. S. (2022). Approaches to participatory policymaking processes. UNIDO.

Salerno, J., Andersson, K., Bailey, K. M., Hilton, T., Mwaviko, K. K., Simon, I. D., Bracebridge, C., Mangewa, L. J., Nicholas, A., Rutabanzibwa, H., & Hartter, J. (2021). More robust local governance suggests positive effects of long-term community conservation. Conservation Science and Practice, 3, e297. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.297

Solomon, J. N., Gavin, M. C., & Gore, M. L. (2015). Detecting and understanding non-compliance with conservation rules. Biological Conservation, 153, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.028

Sterling, E. J., Betley, E., Sigouin, A., Gomez, A., Toomey, A., Cullman, G., Malone, C., Pekor, A., Arengo, F., Blair, M., Filardi, C., Landrigan, K., & Porzecanski, A. L. (2017). Assessing the evidence for stakeholder engagement in biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 209, 159-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.008

van Eeden, L. H., Bekessy, S., Smith, L., Gregg, E. A., Hatty, M., Kaufman, S., Kusmanoff, A. M., Lauren, N., Lee, K., Lentini, P. E., Renowden, C., Selinske, M., Squires, Z. E., & Hames, F. (2025). Knowing how to create a community partnership is the key to policymakers who would like to achieve effective wildlife management approaches. Earth Stewardship, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/eas2.70018

van Teijlingen, E. R., & Hundley, V. (2001). Importance of pilot studies. Social Research UPDATE, 35. https://scispace.com/pdf/the-importance-of-pilot-studies-3j736byere.pdf

Woolaston, K., Flower, E., van Velden, J., White, S., Burns, G. L., & Morrison, C. (2021). A review of the role of law and policy in human-wildlife conflict. Conservation & Society, 19(3), 172-183. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27081498

https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_176_20

Zaza, C., Wright-De Agüero, L. K., Briss, P. A., Truman, B. I., & Hopkins, D. P. (2000). Data collection instrument and procedure selection in public health surveillance. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 19(4), 78-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00214-8