Effect of communication techniques on learners’ academic performance in selected nine years basic education schools, Rubavu District, Rwanda

https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.6.2.61

Authors

Keywords:

Academic Performance, Communication Techniques, Multimedia Visual Aids, Non-verbal Communication, Verbal Communication, Written Communication

Abstract

This study examined how communication techniques affect students’ academic performance in nine-Year Basic Education (9YBE) in Rubavu District, Rwanda. It aimed to achieve four main objectives:  to examine the effect of verbal communication used by teachers on learners’ academic performance, to evaluate the effect of non-verbal communication applied by teachers on learners’ academic performance, to assess the effect of written communication utilized by teachers on learners’ performance, and to analyze the effect of multimedia visual aids practiced by teachers on learners’ academic performance in 9 YBE schools in Rubavu District. The research used Social Constructivism and the Transactional Model of Communication as the guiding theoretical frameworks. A correlational research design was chosen, combining both quantitative and qualitative methods. The study involved five selected 9YBE schools in Rubavu District, with a total of 2,097 participants and a sample of 336, including 276 students, 50 teachers, 5 study directors, and 5 school leaders. Purposive and stratified sampling techniques were used, following Yamane’s formula to determine the sample size. Data collection included structured questionnaires with Likert-scale options, one-on-one interviews, and document analysis. Quantitative data were analyzed using statistical methods, with descriptive statistics summarizing the numerical data and inferential statistics drawing population-wide conclusions. Analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 2022 for numerical data and thematic analysis for qualitative data. The results showed important connections between different communication techniques and students’ academic performance. Verbal communication explained 72.7% of the differences in performance (R² = 0.727, p = 0.002), indicating a strong positive effect. Non-verbal communication accounted for 72% of the differences (R² = 0.720, p = 0.003), also showing a significant impact. Written communication had an even stronger relationship, explaining 82% of the differences (R² = 0.820, p = 0.004), highlighting its important role in helping students succeed. In contrast, multimedia visual aids only explained 32.6% of the differences (R² = 0.326, p = 0.0005), suggesting a modest effect and indicating that some students might have limited access to different types of multimedia aids. The study concluded that verbal, non-verbal, and written communication techniques significantly influence learners’ academic performance in 9YBE schools in Rubavu District, with written communication showing the strongest impact. In contrast, multimedia visual aids had limited effectiveness due to infrastructural and training challenges. It recommends the Ministry of Education to focus on teacher training in verbal, non-verbal, and written communication skills, improve access to teaching resources, and promote structured teacher-student-parent interactions, while cautiously integrating multimedia tools through targeted pilot programs.

Dimensions

Alibali, M., Nathan, M., & Fujimori, Y. (2011). Gestures in the classroom: What's the point? In Developmental cognitive science goes to school (pp. 219-234). Routledge.

Alqahtani, M. H., & Albidewi, I. A. (2022). Teachers' English language training programmes in Saudi Arabia for achieving sustainability in education. Sustainability, 14(22), 15323. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215323 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215323

Alshumaimeri, Y. A., & Alhumud, A. M. (2021). EFL students' perceptions of the effectiveness of virtual classrooms in enhancing communication skills. English Language Teaching, 14(11), 80. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n11p80 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n11p80

Amani, N. (2025). The role of feedback in continuous improvement in schools. NIJCIAM, 6(1), 134-140. https://doi.org/10.59298/NIJCIAM/2025/6.1.134140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59298/NIJCIAM/2025/6.1.134140

Bakker, A., & Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (2004). Learning to reason about distribution. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 147-168). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2278-6_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2278-6_7

Barnes, N., Fives, H., & Dacey, C. M. (2015). Teachers' beliefs about assessment. In H. Fives & M. Gregoire Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teacher beliefs (pp. 284-300). Routledge.

Basak, R., & Basu, S. K. (2024). Teachers engagement in academic motivation of school students. International Journal of Business and Society, 15(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.53390/IJBS.2024.15101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53390/IJBS.2024.15101

Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (1991). Conditions of vocabulary acquisition. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 789-814). Longman.

Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698-712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462

Bukhari, S. U. P., Kalhoro, I. A., Lashari, A. A., Soomro, I. A., Batool, S., & Amur, A. (2023). The communication barriers and their impacts on the academic performance of graduate students. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 7(5), 605-612.

Burgoon, J. K., Guerrero, L. K., & Floyd, K. (2016). Nonverbal communication. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315663425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315663425

Burgoon, J. K., Manusov, V., & Guerrero, L. K. (2021). Nonverbal communication (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003095552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003095552

Cheng, Y.-L., & Mix, K. S. (2014). Spatial training improves children's mathematics ability. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15(1), 2-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2012.725186

https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2012.725186

Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students' questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44, 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260701828101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260701828101

Darling-Hammond, L., Schachner, A. C. W., Wojcikiewicz, S. K., & Flook, L. (2023). Educating teachers to enact the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 28(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2022.2130506 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2022.2130506

Denning, T., Griswold, W. G., Simon, B., & Wilkerson, M. H. (2006). Multimodal communication in the classroom. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 38(1), 219. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124706.1121410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1124706.1121410

Etyarisky, V., & Marsigit, M. (2022). The effectiveness of interactive learning multimedia with a contextual approach to students' understanding of mathematical concepts. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(3), 3101-3110. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i3.941 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i3.941

Faustino, A., & Cheema, G. K. (2024). Instructional technologies of education in East African countries: An overview. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 13(S1), 236-252. https://doi.org/10.32674/arn6je58 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32674/arn6je58

Finkelhor, D., & Jones, L. (2006). Why have child maltreatment and child victimization declined? Journal of Social Issues, 62(4), 685-716. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00483.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00483.x

Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2011). Academic language in the secondary classroom. Principal Leadership, 64-66.

Gan, Z., An, Z., & Liu, F. (2021). Teacher feedback practices, student feedback motivation, and feedback behavior: How are they associated with learning outcomes? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 697045. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.697045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.697045

Ghafar, Z. N. (2023). Nonverbal communication in the classroom and its role in the teaching and learning from educational process. Journal of Social Science (JoSS), 2(8), 712-719. https://doi.org/10.57185/joss.v2i6.82

Ghafar, Z. N., & Mahmood, H. M. A. (2023). Nonverbal communication in the classroom and its role in the teaching and learning from educational process. Journal of Social Science (JoSS), 2(8), 712-719. https://doi.org/10.57185/joss.v2i6.82 DOI: https://doi.org/10.57185/joss.v2i6.82

Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing Next: Effective strategies to improve the writing of adolescents in middle and high schools - A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Alliance for Excellent Education.

Graham, S., Cao, Y., Kim, Y.-S., Lee, J., Tate, T., Collins, P., Cho, M., Moon, Y., Chung, H., & Olson, C. (2024). Effective writing instruction for students in grades 6 to 12: A best evidence meta-analysis. Reading and Writing, 38(4), 1-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10539-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10539-2

Graham, S., Harris, K. R., MacArthur, C. A., & Schwartz, S. (1991). Writing and writing instruction for students with learning disabilities: Review of a research program. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14(2), 89-114. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510517 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1510517

Haataja, E., Salonen, V., Laine, A., Toivanen, M., & Hannula, M. S. (2021). The relation between teacher-student eye contact and teachers' interpersonal behavior during group work: A multiple-person gaze-tracking case study in secondary mathematics education. Educational Psychology Review, 33(1), 51-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09538-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09538-w

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

Hall, J. A., Horgan, T. G., & Murphy, N. A. (2019). Nonverbal communication. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 271-294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103145

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Hostetter, A. B. (2011). When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 297-315. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022128

Iskandar, A., Rizal, M., Kurniasih, N., Sutiksno, D., & Purnomo, A. (2018). The effects of multimedia learning on students' achievement in terms of cognitive test results. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1114(1), 012019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1114/1/012019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1114/1/012019

Johnson, A. M., Jacovina, M. E., Russell, D. E., & Soto, C. M. (2016). Challenges and solutions when using technologies in the classroom. In S. A. Crossley & D. S. McNamara (Eds.), Adaptive educational technologies for literacy instruction (pp. 13-29). Taylor & Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315647500-2

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315647500-2

Jonsson, A., & Williams, P. (2012). Communication with young children in preschool: The complex matter of a child perspective. Early Child Development and Care, 183(5), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2012.678488 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2012.678488

Jurs, P., & Špehte, E. (2021). The role of feedback in the distance learning process. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 23(2), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2021-0019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2021-0019

Kalyani, D. L. (2024). The role of technology in education: Enhancing learning outcomes and 21st-century skills. International Journal of Scientific Research in Modern Science and Technology, 3(4), 05-10. https://doi.org/10.59828/ijsrmst.v3i4.199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59828/ijsrmst.v3i4.199

Kasim, H. Y., & Kayame, de J. (2022). Teacher-student verbal communication and student learning. International Journal of Curriculum Development, Teaching and Learning Innovation, 1(1), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.35335/curriculum.v1i1.53 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35335/curriculum.v1i1.53

Khumairah, N., Ramlah, R., & Muin, N. (2023). Impact of teacher motivation on student engagement and classroom behavior in secondary schools. Educia Journal, 1(2), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.71435/610409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.71435/610409

Kinanga, T. T. M., Kafu, P. A., & Oseko, A. (2024). The effect of non-verbal cues on pupil participation during the teaching of Kiswahili by Tambach trainee-teachers. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 12(2), 2007-2018. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.12.2.1415 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.12.2.1415

Knapp, M. L., & Hall, J. A. (2007). Nonverbal communication in human interaction (5th ed.). Wadsworth/Thomas Learning.

Kotronoulas, G., Miguel, S., Dowling, M., Fernández-Ortega, P., Colomer-Lahiguera, S., Bağçivan, G., Pape, E., Drury, A., Semple, C., Dieperink, K. B., & Papadopoulou, C. (2023). An overview of the fundamentals of data management, analysis, and interpretation in quantitative research. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 39(2), 151398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151398

Kucuk, T. (2023). The power of body language in education: A study of teachers' perceptions. International Journal of Social Sciences and Educational Studies, 10(3), 275-289. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v10i3p275 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v10i3p275

Kusumo, B., Sutrisman, H., Simanjuntak, R., & Yunus, R. (2024). The impact of technology-based learning on student engagement and achievement in the digital era. International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Advancement, 1(4), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijeepa.v1i4.55 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62951/ijeepa.v1i4.55

Lugasi, N., Sachar, Y., & Vakil, E. (2023). The effect of facial expressions on the process of learning and memory of face images among healthy participants and individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI): Examination using eye movements. Psychology, 14, 1361-1380. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2023.148077 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2023.148077

Mahdi, S. (2023). Effective communication in learning: Teacher strategies and their impact on student learning outcomes. International Journal of Linguistics, Communication and Broadcasting, 1(4), 26-30. https://doi.org/10.46336/ijlcb.v1i4.26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46336/ijlcb.v1i4.26

Mahoro, C., & Ngabonziza, J. D. A. (2024). The impact of shifting the medium of instruction on academic performance in lower primary schools in Rubavu District, Rwanda. African Journal of Empirical Research, 5(3), 1059-1068. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.5.3.90 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.5.3.90

Maričić, M., & Lavicza, Z. (2024). Enhancing student engagement through emerging technology integration in STEAM learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 23361-23389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12710-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12710-2

Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092

Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.003

Mayer, R. E., & Fiorella, L. (2021). Introduction to multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer & L. Fiorella (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 3-16). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.003

Mehrabian, A., & Ferris, S. R. (1967). Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication in two channels. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31(3), 248-252. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024648 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024648

Mercer, N., & Hodgkinson, S. (Eds.). (2008). Exploring talk in school: Inspired by the work of Douglas Barnes. SAGE Publications Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279526

https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279526

Ministry of Education and Sports. (2012). Evaluating and improving the quality of education, Part 1: How can we improve our school? A guide to school self-evaluation and planning for improvement. SUSE Printers & Co. Ltd.

Mishra, S. (2025). The importance of teaching communication skills in classrooms. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5145425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5145425

Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159-1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581

Muhammad, A. S., Norsuhaily, A., Abu Bakar, K., & Halabi, K. A. (2021). Impact of motivation on students' academic performance: A case study of University Sultan Zainal Abidin students. Journal Name, 1(6), 221-226.

Mukhlis, R., Rokhman, F., Zulaeha, I., & Mardikantoro, H. B. (2024). Optimization of teachers' verbal communication rhetoric in improving the quality of education services. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(5), e06267. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n5-132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n5-132

Munna, A. S., & Kalam, M. A. (2021). Teaching and learning process to enhance teaching effectiveness: A literature review. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI), 4(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.33750/ijhi.v4i1.102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33750/ijhi.v4i1.102

Nia, H. W., Sudarman, S., & Rahayu, V. P. (2023). The effectiveness of using video-based learning media on learning motivation of students of Class X SMA Negeri 3 Samarinda. Educational Studies Conference Series, 2(2), 268-275. https://doi.org/10.30872/escs.v2i2.1619 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30872/escs.v2i2.1619

Ntawiha, P., Nasiforo, B. M., Buhigiro, L. J., & Barayagwiza, P. (2023). Enhancing quality of teaching and learning sciences through multimedia in selected secondary schools in Rwanda. The Cradle of Knowledge: African Journal of Educational and Social Science Research, 11(2), 100-106. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajessr.v11i2.6

Ntawiha, P., Nasiforo, M. B., Buhigiro, J. L., & Barayagwiza, P. (2023). Enhancing quality of teaching and learning sciences through multimedia in selected secondary schools in Rwanda. The Cradle of Knowledge: African Journal of Educational and Social Science Research, 11(2), 100-106. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajessr.v11i2.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/ajessr.v11i2.6

Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A., Kachur, R., & Prendergast, C. (1998). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. Language, 74(2), 444. https://doi.org/10.2307/417942 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/417942

Oyeronke, P., Adeoye, M. A., Arowosaye, S. A., & Yejide, I. (2024). The impact of active listening on student engagement and learning outcomes in educational settings. International Journal of Universal Education, 2(2), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.33084/ijue.v2i2.8898 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33084/ijue.v2i2.8898

Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In S. L. Christenson et al. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 365-385). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_17

Plaindaren, C., & Shah, P. M. (2019). A study on the effectiveness of written feedback in writing tasks among upper secondary school pupils. Creative Education, 10(13), 3491-3508. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1013269 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1013269

REB. (2022). Teacher communication and instructional policy framework. Kigali: Government of Rwanda. https://reb.rw/fileadmin/REB/Policies/Teacher_Communication_Policy.pdf

REB. (2023). National Curriculum Framework and Teacher Communication Guidelines. Kigali: REB. https://reb.rw/national-curriculum-framework-2023

Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students' school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493-529. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793

Saleem, A., Kausar, H., & Deeba, F. (2021). Social constructivism: A new paradigm in teaching and learning environment. Perennial Journal of History, 2(2), 403-421. https://doi.org/10.52700/pjh.v2i2.86 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52700/pjh.v2i2.86

Schnotz, W., & Lowe, R. (2008). A unified view of learning from animated and static graphics. In R. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation: Research implications for design (pp. 304-356). Cambridge University Press.

Seltzer, L. J., Prososki, A. R., Ziegler, T. E., & Pollak, S. D. (2012). Instant messages vs. speech: Hormones and why we still need to hear each other. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(1), 42-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.05.004

Shabiralyani, G., Shahzad Hasan, K., Hamad, N., & Iqbal, N. (2015). Impact of visual aids in enhancing the learning process: A case research. Journal of Education and Practice, 6, 226-234.

Shakil, A., Faizi, W., & Nisar ul Haq, M. (2020). Impact of multimedia on the academic performance of students at secondary school level. Global Social Sciences Review, 5(II), 249-259. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-II).24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-II).24

Shao, Y., Kang, S., Lu, Q., Zhang, C., & Li, R. (2024). Learning motivation and learning engagement. BMC Psychology, 12, 278. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01780-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01780-z

Shute, V. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795

Tariq, M., & Ullah, H. (2024). Impact of teachers' communication skills on academic achievement of students at secondary school level. Journal of Higher Education and Development Studies (JHEDS), 4(1), 104-117. https://doi.org/10.59219/jheds.04.01.49 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59219/jheds.04.01.49

Tuyishime, D., & Andala, H. O. (2024). Influence of English language usage on students' academic performance in physics in public secondary schools in Rwanda: A case of Gakenke District. Journal of Research in Interdisciplinary Education, 8(4), 206-218.

Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002

Wentzel, K. R. (2014). Motivating students to learn (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203108017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203108017

Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2021). The effects of providing and receiving peer feedback on writing performance and learning of secondary school students. American Educational Research Journal, 58(3), 492-526. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831220945266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831220945266

Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics, an introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper & Row.

Published

2025-06-17

How to Cite

Muyizere, L., Oniye, A. O., & Sikubwabo, C. (2025). Effect of communication techniques on learners’ academic performance in selected nine years basic education schools, Rubavu District, Rwanda. African Journal of Empirical Research, 6(2), 729–746. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.6.2.61