Effect of distributed leadership style on academic performance of secondary school students: Case study of Musanze District, Rwanda 2023-2024

Boniface Mvukiyehe; Abdulrazaq Olayinka Oniye

doi:10.51867/ajernet.6.2.51

Authors

Boniface Mvukiyehe
mvukbonse@gmail.com
University of Kigali, Musanze, Rwanda
Abdulrazaq Olayinka Oniye University of Kigali, Musanze, Rwanda

Keywords:

Academic Performance, Accountability, Distributed Leadership, Musanze District, Rwanda, School Leadership

Abstract

This study examined how distributed leadership style affects the academic performance of secondary school students in Musanze District (2023-2024). This study focused on understanding how accountability by school leaders influences the academic performance of secondary school students in Musanze District, Rwanda, during the 2023–2024 academic year. It was guided by Transformational Leadership Theory and Social Learning Theory. A convergent parallel mixed-methods approach was used to collect both numerical and descriptive data from 15 secondary schools. The sample included 320 participants made up of students, teachers, Directors of Studies, and school leaders. Stratified and census sampling methods were applied, and the sample size was calculated using Yamane’s formula. Data collection tools included structured questionnaires, interviews, and document reviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS version 27, while qualitative data were reviewed through thematic analysis. Results showed that accountability had a strong and clear effect on student academic performance, with an R-squared value of 0.866 and a p-value of 0.000. This means that when school leaders act responsibly and follow up on duties, students tend to perform better. However, some challenges were observed, such as limited supervision time and weak monitoring systems. To enhance academic performance, school leaders should set clear goals, provide regular feedback, and foster open communication. The Ministry of Education must support schools with resources, training, and monitoring. Promoting collaboration with families and communities will strengthen accountability practices and help improve student outcomes nationwide through shared responsibility and transparent leadership.

Dimensions

REFERENCES

Alvi, A. K., & Awan, M. U. (2021). The impact of transformational leadership on employees' performance: A study of the education sector. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 135-158.

Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2023). NAPLAN results 2023. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority.

AITSL. (2021). Leadership in education: A review of the evidence. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership.

Babbie, E. (2020). The practice of social research (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Bandura, A. (2018). A new perspective on self-efficacy. Routledge.

Bass, B. M. (2020). Transformational leadership theory. Routledge.

Bimenyimana, P. (2023). Accountability in school leadership: Challenges and opportunities in Musanze District secondary schools. East African Journal of Educational Management, 4(2), 59-76.

California Department of Education. (2021). California assessment of student performance and progress (CAASPP) results. California Department of Education.

Chen, L., & Williams, R. (2021). The effects of leadership accountability on student achievement: Evidence from urban schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(4), 387-401.

Creswell, J. W. (2020). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Cook-Harvey, C. M. (2018). Educating the whole child: Improving school climate to support student success. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/145.655 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54300/145.655

Darling-Hammond, L., & Hyler, M. E. (2020). Supporting teacher learning: A review of the evidence on professional development. Learning Policy Institute.

Davis, J., Smith, K., & Johnson, L. (2022). The impact of transformational leadership in organizations. Journal of Leadership Studies, 15(3), 45-60.

Geyer, L., & Tumasjan, A. (2022). Leadership in a changing world: The role of transformational leadership in fostering resilience and innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(4), 567-582.

Gordon, E. W., & Brantley, B. (2021). The impact of leadership on student achievement: A review of research. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center.

Habimana, R., & Umutoni, S. (2023). Teacher autonomy and classroom engagement in Rwandan secondary schools: A case study in Musanze District. Journal of Education Innovations, 6(3), 101-115.

Harris, A. (2023). Distributed leadership in schools: Developing the leaders of tomorrow. Routledge.

Hrastinski, S. (2009). A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 78-82.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.009

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2022). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction. Educational Psychologist, 57(2), 175-189.

Leithwood, K., & Azah, V. N. (2017). Characteristics of high-performing school districts: A review of empirical evidence. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 16(1), 27-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2016.1197282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2016.1197282

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201-227.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565829 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565829

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2022). How school leadership influences student learning: A test of the four paths model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 58(2), 221-247.

Leithwood, K., Sun, J., & Schumacker, R. (2020). How school leadership influences student learning: A test of the four paths model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(4), 570-599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X19878772 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X19878772

MINEDUC. (2020). Education sector strategic plan 2018-2024. https://www.mineduc.gov.rw

Mugo, J. K., & Orodho, J. A. (2023). Distributed leadership and student performance in Kenyan secondary schools. African Educational Research Journal, 11(2), 45-60.

Munyaneza, F. (2023). Leadership styles in Rwandan secondary schools: Implications for academic success. International Journal of Educational Management, 37(3), 132-147.

Ndayishimiye, C., Ngabonziza, R. S., & Hakizimana, O. (2023). Challenges and opportunities in educational leadership in Rwanda. Rwanda Journal of Education, 9(1), 12-25.

OECD. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2023-en

OECD. (2021). Education at a glance 2021: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b35a14e5-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/b35a14e5-en

Rukundo, A., Ngangaliku, M., & Nshimiyimana, J. C. (2022). Effect of leadership styles on academic performance in Rwandan secondary schools. Journal of Education and Practice, 13(2), 45-56.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer.

Smith, J., Brown, T., & Davis, K. (2021). Observational learning in classrooms: A pathway to student success. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(4), 567-582.

Smith, R., & Brown, T. (2023). Accountability in educational leadership: Setting clear goals for success. Journal of Educational Leadership, 14(3), 45-60.

SADBE. (2023). Annual national assessment report. Pretoria: Government of South Africa.

Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass.

Wallace Foundation. (2020). The role of distributed leadership in improving schools. Wallace Foundation.

Wang, M. T., You, R., & Eccles, J. S. (2023). The role of a supportive environment in fostering student autonomy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(1), 48-62.

Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper and Row.