Household-level land fragmentation and food security implications of land consolidation in the Terai region of Nepal: A case study of Lakshmaniya Rural Municipality

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.2.93

Palavras-chave:

Land Consolidation, Land Fragmentation, Food Security, Food Sufficiency, Nepal

Resumo

Agricultural land fragmentation remains a major constraint to efficient farming in Nepal, where many agricultural households operate several small and spatially separated parcels rather than a single compact holding. Theory of Land Fragmentation and Farm Efficiency anchored this research. This study assessed household-level land fragmentation and its food-security implications in selected settlements of Lakshmaniya Rural Municipality in the Terai region of Nepal. This study adopted a cross-sectional household-level analytical research design. The target population consisted of agricultural households operating land parcels in the selected settlements. A settlement-wise random household survey was conducted among 396 sampled households from 12 settlements using a structured questionnaire. Fragmentation was measured using parcel-based indicators, including parcel count, average parcel size, parcels per hectare, and land per capita. The analysis used descriptive statistics, cross-tabulation, chi-square tests, Cramér’s V, ordered logistic regression, and a simple land-consolidation scenario. The results showed a mean family size of 6.90 persons, a mean parcel count of 5.88, and a mean operated land area of 0.78 ha, with 47.73% of households falling into the high-fragmentation class. Food sufficiency and irrigation status were significantly associated with fragmentation class, whereas self-reported productivity perception was not. After controlling for operated area and family size, higher parcels per hectare were associated with lower odds of being in a better food-sufficiency category, while larger operated area was associated with higher odds. Under the one-parcel consolidation scenario, mean parcel count declined from 5.88 to 1.00, average parcel size increased from 1,190.71 m² to 7,845.81 m², and parcels per hectare decreased from 10.28 to 3.43. These findings suggest that land consolidation could substantially reduce operational fragmentation and create more favourable conditions for efficient farm management and improved household food security. Therefore, local governments and land-management agencies should prioritize participatory land-consolidation pilot programs in highly fragmented settlements, supported by updated cadastral information, irrigation improvement, farm-road access, mechanization support, and farmer-centered implementation mechanisms.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

Agresti, A. (2013). Categorical data analysis (3rd ed.). Wiley.

Air, B. S., & Ghimire, M. L. (2016). Parcel fragmentation and land consolidation. Journal on Geoinformatics, Nepal, 15(1), 70-74. https://doi.org/10.3126/njg.v15i1.51189

de Vries, W. T. (2022). Social aspects in land consolidation processes. Land, 11(3), 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11030452

https://doi.org/10.3390/land11030452

Demetriou, D., Stillwell, J., & See, L. (2013). A new methodology for measuring land fragmentation. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 39, 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.02.001

Dhakal, B. N., & Khanal, N. R. (2018). Causes and consequences of fragmentation of agricultural land: A case of Nawalparasi District, Nepal. Geographical Journal of Nepal, 11, 95-112. https://doi.org/10.3126/gjn.v11i0.19551

Government of Nepal. (1963). Land Survey and Measurement Act, 2019. Nepal Law Commission.

Government of Nepal. (1964). Lands Act, 1964. Nepal Law Commission.

Government of Nepal. (2019). Land Use Act, 2019. Nepal Law Commission.

Government of Nepal. (2022). Land Use Regulations, 2079. Nepal Law Commission.

Looga, J., Jürgenson, E., Sikk, K., Matveev, E., & Maasikamäe, S. (2018). Land fragmentation and other determinants of agricultural farm productivity: The case of Estonia. Land Use Policy, 79, 285-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.021

McCullagh, P. (1980). Regression models for ordinal data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 42(2), 109-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1980.tb01109.x

Niroula, G. S., & Thapa, G. B. (2005). Impacts and causes of land fragmentation, and lessons learned from land consolidation in South Asia. Land Use Policy, 22(4), 358-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.10.001

Paudel, B., Pandit, J., & Reed, B. F. (2013). Fragmentation and conversion of agricultural land in Nepal (MPRA Paper No. 58880). University Library of Munich.

Pun, R., Joshi, N. P., & Pun, S. (2024). Factors influencing farmers' preference for farmland consolidation in Nepal: Evidence from a randomized conjoint experiment. Agricultural Systems, 219, 104038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104038

Rahman, S., & Rahman, M. (2009). Impact of land fragmentation and resource ownership on productivity and efficiency: The case of rice producers in Bangladesh. Land Use Policy, 26(1), 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.01.003

Thapa, G. B., & Niroula, G. S. (2008). Alternative options of land consolidation in the mountains of Nepal: An analysis based on stakeholders' opinions. Land Use Policy, 25(3), 338-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.09.002

Downloads

Publicado

2026-06-01

Edição

Secção

Articles

Como Citar

Dahal , T. P., Nepali, P. B., Shrestha, R., Bisht, B. S., & Subedi, N. (2026). Household-level land fragmentation and food security implications of land consolidation in the Terai region of Nepal: A case study of Lakshmaniya Rural Municipality. African Journal of Empirical Research, 7(2), 1087-1102. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.2.93