Factors influencing the performance of donor-funded water projects in Zanzibar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.2.85Palavras-chave:
Donor-Funded Projects, Performance, Water Projects, ZanzibarResumo
This study examined the factors influencing the performance of donor-funded water projects in Zanzibar, with a specific focus on the roles of type of funding, stakeholder participation, and monitoring and evaluation (M&E) mechanisms. The study was guided by two theories, which are Systems Theory and Resource Dependence Theory. A pragmatism philosophy with a mixed-methods approach was adopted. The study also adopted a cross-sectional design, with a target population comprising all individuals directly involved in the planning, implementation, funding, monitoring, or use of donor-funded water projects in Zanzibar. This population was approximately 184 individuals and included four key stakeholder categories. The study employed a combination of stratified random sampling for the quantitative component and purposive sampling for the qualitative component (overall sample size was 126). Data was collected across all five administrative regions of Unguja and Pemba using a structured questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze quantitative data, and qualitative data was analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings revealed that funding types had a positive and significant influence on the performance of donor-funded water projects in Zanzibar (Beta = 0.55, p = 0.000). Similarly, stakeholder participation had a positive and significant influence on the performance of donor-funded water projects in Zanzibar (Beta = 0.42, p = 0.000), and monitoring and evaluation (M&E) mechanisms had a positive but non-significant influence (β = 0.11, p = 0.090), suggesting its influence may be mediated through other variables. Qualitative insights explained how these factors operated: grants enabled rapid contractor mobilization, community committees sustained boreholes through user fees, and digital M&E dashboards facilitated real-time adjustments. The study concluded that flexible, untied funding, inclusive, institutionalized participation, and effective M&E mechanisms are critical factors for the effective performance of donor-funded water projects in Zanzibar. The study recommends that Zanzibar should prioritize grant-based and NGO-supported funding models, as these have proven to deliver faster completion and higher functionality. Also, communities should be actively engaged in site selection and planning to ensure community ownership of the projects, and monitoring and evaluation should be strengthened through mobile applications, site visits, and real-time reporting to catch problems early and prevent costly failures.
Downloads
Referências
Bertalanffy, L. von. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller.
Brech, V., & Potrafke, N. (2014). Donor ideology and types of foreign aid. Journal of Comparative Economics, 42(1), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2013.07.002
Chumbula, J. J., & Massawe, F. A. (2018). The role of local institutions in the creation of an enabling environment for water project sustainability in Iringa District, Tanzania. Environmental & Socio-Economic Studies, 6(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.2478/environ-2018-0023
Crawford, P., & Bryce, P. (2003). Project monitoring and evaluation: A method for enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of aid project implementation. International Journal of Project Management, 21(5), 363-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00060-1
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Daoud, J. I. (2017). Multicollinearity and regression analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 949(1), 012009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/949/1/012009
Dietrich, S. (2016). Donor political economies and the pursuit of aid effectiveness. International Organization, 70(1), 65-102. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818315000302
Dreher, A., Fuchs, A., Parks, B., Strange, A. M., & Tierney, M. J. (2018). Apples and dragon fruits: The determinants of aid and other forms of state financing from China to Africa. International Studies Quarterly, 62(1), 182-194. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx052
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Freire Machete, I., & Cunha Marques, R. (2023). Water supply and sanitation projects in the last decade: Project characteristics, multilateral development bank performance, and quality of results. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 13(12), 986-1000. https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2023.176
Kirenga, D., Mung'ong'o, C., & Mbwette, T. (2018). Influence of water fund to sustainability of community managed rural water supply projects: Moshi District, Northern Tanzania. Huria Journal of the Open University of Tanzania, 25(2), 16-36. https://journals.out.ac.tz/index.php/HURIA/article/view/637
Loucks, D. P., & van Beek, E. (2017). Water resource systems planning and management: An introduction to methods, models, and applications. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44234-1
Luwesi, C. N., Akudugu, M. A., Peter, P. W., Nkama, F. N., Beyene, A., & Mingashanga, H. M. (2023). Innovative instruments and contractual arrangements to offset bottlenecks for financial flows in the water sector. In Innovative water finance in Africa: Economics and principles of financial innovations for water managers (pp. 55-79). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38234-5_3
Machete, I. F., & Marques, R. C. (2023). Project risks influence on water supply and sanitation sector financing opportunities. Water, 15(12), 2295. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15122295
Mgulo, R., & Kamazima, S. R. (2022). Community participation and non-governmental organizations-funded rural water projects' sustainability: A case of Chamwino District, Dodoma Region, Tanzania. European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 4(2), 51-56.
https://doi.org/10.24018/ejmed.2022.4.2.1166
Ministry of Water, Tanzania. (2023). Water sector performance report 2023. Government of Tanzania.
Newman, R. J. S., Enns, C., Capitani, C., Thorn, J. P. R., Courtney-Mustaphi, C. J., Buckton, S. J., Om, E. S., Fazey, I., Haji, T. A., Nchimbi, A. Y., Kariuki, R. W., & Marchant, R. A. (2024). 'Kesho' scenario development for supporting water-energy-food security under future conditions in Zanzibar. Land, 13(2), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13020195
Nijhawan, A., Howard, G., Poudel, M., Pregnolato, M., Lo, Y. T. E., Ghimire, A., Baidya, M., Geremew, A., Flint, A., & Mulugeta, Y. (2022). Assessing the climate resilience of community managed water supplies in Ethiopia and Nepal. Water, 14(8), 1293. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14081293
O'Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673-690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
Osborne, J. W., & Waters, E. (2002). Four assumptions of multiple regression that researchers should always test. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 8(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.7275/r222-hv23
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.
Prokopy, L. S. (2005). The relationship between participation and project outcomes: Evidence from rural water supply projects in India. World Development, 33(11), 1801-1819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.07.002
Revolutionary Government of Zanzibar. (2022). Zanzibar Water Investment Programme 2022-2027: Supporting the implementation of the Zanzibar Development Vision 2050 towards achieving the blue economy. Ministry of Water, Energy and Minerals. http://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/taz218175.pdf
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Shields, K. F., Moffa, M., Behnke, N. L., Kelly, E., Klug, T., Lee, K., Cronk, R., & Bartram, J. (2021). Community management does not equate to participation: Fostering community participation in rural water supplies. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 11(6), 937-947. https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2021.089
Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th ed.). Routledge.
Sweya, L. N., Wilkinson, S., & Kassenga, G. (2021). A social resilience measurement tool for Tanzania's water supply systems. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 65, 102558.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102558
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations.
UN-Water. (2024). United Nations World Water Development Report 2024: Water for prosperity and peace. UNESCO. https://www.unwater.org/publications
Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller.
Whaley, L., & Cleaver, F. (2017). Can 'functionality' save the community management model of rural water supply? Water Resources and Rural Development, 9, 56-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wrr.2017.04.001
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme. (2023). Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2023 update. World Health Organization and UNICEF.
World Bank. (2024). Tanzania water supply and sanitation projects: Annual update 2024. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org
World Health Organization, & United Nations Children's Fund. (2023). Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2023 update. WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP). https://washdata.org
Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper and Row.
Zanzibar Water Authority. (2024). Annual water supply and access report 2024. Government of Zanzibar.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2026 Ernest Godson, Ali Masoud

Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0.













