Article Knowledge management strategy and innovation performance of manufacturing firms of Uganda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.2.34Palavras-chave:
Codification Knowledge Strategy, Innovation Performance, Manufacturing Firms, Personalisation Knowledge StrategyResumo
To thrive, many businesses, especially those based in developing countries, rely heavily on their ability to innovate. However, improving on the innovation performance is challenging for many manufacturing firms. This study therefore investigated the effect of knowledge management strategy on innovation performance. The study was guided by resource-based view theory. A cross-sectional explanatory survey design was applied to examine the nature of reality. Data was collected from a sample of 263, picked from a total of 3894 manufacturing firms by use of simple random sampling and purposive sampling techniques. Further, a self-administered questionnaire was the only tool used for data collection. The collected data were analysed and hypotheses tested using hierarchical and multiple regression models. The findings shed light on several crucial aspects of knowledge management strategy that influence innovation performance. Specifically, codification strategy and personalisation strategy were found to have a substantial impact on innovation performance, particularly in the context of the manufacturing sector. The study only covered knowledge management strategy among manufacturing firms, even though it is also popular in organisations, especially the service sector organisations. Thus, the findings are not generalisable to all other firms. Further, the study employed a cross-sectional quantitative research design, yet innovation performance fluctuates over time and depends on the environment that one is facing at that particular time. Finally, the study was limited to only one predictor of innovation performance: knowledge management strategy despite the existence of several other predictors. Results suggest that effective knowledge management strategies implemented at the firm level are likely to improve the level of innovativeness of manufacturing firms. Given the positive and significant influence of both knowledge codification and knowledge personalisation strategies on innovation performance, it is recommended that manufacturing firms adopt a balanced knowledge management approach that integrates both strategies. Specifically, firms should invest in robust knowledge codification systems—such as databases, standard operating procedures, and digital knowledge repositories—to ensure that critical organisational knowledge is captured, stored, and easily accessible for reuse and continuous improvement. At the same time, organisations should actively promote knowledge personalisation through initiatives that facilitate direct interaction among employees, including teamwork, mentorship programs, communities of practice, and cross-functional collaboration. This will enhance the sharing of tacit knowledge, which is essential for creativity and the development of novel solutions. Furthermore, management should align knowledge management strategies with organisational innovation goals by fostering a supportive culture, investing in enabling technologies, and providing continuous training to employees. This dual emphasis will enable firms to leverage both explicit and tacit knowledge effectively, thereby sustaining and enhancing innovation performance.
Downloads
Referências
Akinwande, M. O., Dikko, H. G., & Samson, A. (2015). Variance Inflation Factor: As a Condition for the Inclusion of Suppressor Variable(s) in Regression Analysis. Open Journal of Statistics, 05(07), 754-767. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2015.57075
Ambrosini, V., & Bowman, C. (2009). What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00251.x
Antony, J., Kaul, A., Sony, M., Singh, N., Vij, P., Bhat, S., Yamini, S., & Laureani, A. (2025). A study into the themes of quality management: Early findings from a global research project and agenda for future research. The TQM Journal, 37(8), 2260-2283.
https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-08-2024-0271
Aragon-Correa, J.A. and Sharma, S. (2003) A Contingent Resource-Based View of Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28, 71-88. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.8925233
https://doi.org/10.2307/30040690
Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J., & Wright, M. (2011). The future of resource-based theory: Revitalization or decline? Journal of Management, 37(5), 1299-1315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310391805
Bata, P. & Norman, A. & Allen, D.. (2020). Information Sharing Behaviour of Complex and Extended Organisations. International Journal of Business and Management. 15. 41-41. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v15n11p41
Bican PM, Brem A. (2020). Managing innovation performance: Results from an industry-spanning explorative study on R&D key measures. Creat Innov Manag ;29:268-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12370
Bolisani, E., Padova, A., & Scarso, E. (2020). The continuous recombination of codification and personalisation km strategies: A retrospective study. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(2), 185-195. https://doi.org/10.34190/EJKM.18.02.008
Bridoux, F. (2004). A resource-based approach to performance and competition: An overview of the connections between resources and competition. Luvain, Belgium Institut et de Gestion, Universite Catholique de Louvain, (1984), 1-21.
Bunawan, A.-A., & Ahmad Sham, N. A. F. (2024a). The Impact of Knowledge Management Process and Approach on Innovation Performance: A Case Study of Telekom Malaysia. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, VIII(V), 2388-2407. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.805173
Bunawan, A.-A., & Ahmad Sham, N. A. F. (2024b). The Impact of Knowledge Management Process and Approach on Innovation Performance: A Case Study of Telekom Malaysia. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, VIII(V), 2388-2407. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.805173
Bunawan, A.-A., & Ahmad Sham, N. A. F. (2024c). The Impact of Knowledge Management Process and Approach on Innovation Performance: A Case Study of Telekom Malaysia. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, VIII(V), 2388-2407. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.805173
Cristache, N., Croitoru, G., & Florea, N. V. (2025a). The influence of knowledge management on innovation and organizational performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(5), 100793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100793
Cristache, N., Croitoru, G., & Florea, N. V. (2025b). The influence of knowledge management on innovation and organizational performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(5), 100793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100793
Duarte, M. P., & Carvalho, F. M. P. D. O. (2025). The Measurement of Innovation: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Global Innovation Index Research. Publications, 13(3), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications13030031
Ferreira, J., Mueller, J., & Papa, A. (2020). Strategic knowledge management: Theory, practice and future challenges. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(2), 121-126. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2018-0461
Ghobadian, A., O'Regan, N., Thomas, H., & Liu, J. (2008). Formal strategic planning, operating environment, size, sector and performance: Evidence from the UK's manufacturing SMEs. Journal of General Management, 34(2), 1-19.
https://doi.org/10.1177/030630700803400201
Harsono, T. W., Hidayat, K., Iqbal, M., & Abdillah, Y. (2024). Creating Sustainable Innovation Performance: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability, 16(12), 4990. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16124990
Hongal, P., & Kinange, Dr. U. (2020). A Study on Talent Management and its Impact on Organization Performance- An Empirical Review. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 10(01), 64-71. https://doi.org/10.31033/ijemr.10.1.12
Jahanbakht, M., & Mostafa, R. (2022). The emergence of GVCs for frontier markets: Insights from the African mobile telecommunications industry. Africa Journal of Management, 8(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322373.2021.2001287
Kolyasnikov, M., & Kelchevskaya, N. (2020). Knowledge management strategies in companies: Trends and the impact of Industry 4.0. Upravlenets, 11(4), 82-96. https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-4-7
Lakshmi, R., & Sajesh, T. A. (2025). A robust distance-based approach for detecting multidimensional outliers. Journal of Applied Statistics, 52(6), 1278-1298. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2024.2422403
Mardani, A., Nikoosokhan, S., Moradi, M., & Doustar, M. (2018). The Relationship Between Knowledge Management and Innovation Performance. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 29(1), 12-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2018.04.002
Nahimana, E. (2024). Impact of Knowledge Management Strategies on Innovation Performance in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Rwanda. American Journal of Data, Information and Knowledge Management, 5(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajdikm.2070
Naz, H., Shah, I., Wasim, D., & Ali, S. (2025). Robust Kibria Estimators for Mitigating Multicollinearity and Outliers in a Linear Regression Model. Stats, 8(4), 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/stats8040119
Njiru, D. K., Mugo, D. M., Musyoka, F. M., & Murikah, W. (2025). How knowledge management systems trap dynamic organisations into outdated practices: A systematic review. Scientific African, 29, e02946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02946
Ode, E., & Ayavoo, R. (2020). The mediating role of knowledge application in the relationship between knowledge management practices and firm innovation. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 5(3), 210-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.08.002
Osman, E. G. A. (2025). Entropy based solutions for detecting and treating multicollinearity in econometrics. Discover Analytics, 3(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44257-025-00047-0
Tajeddini, K., & Martin, E. (2020). The importance of human-related factors on service innovation and performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 85, 0-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102431
Teece D (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal28 (13): 1319-1350. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Teece DJ (2009) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management: organizing for innovation and growth. Oxford: Oxford Uni-versity Press.
Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabi-lities and strategic management. Strategic Manage-ment Journal 18 (7). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Wendra, W., Sule, E. T., Joeliaty, J., & Azis, Y. (2019). Exploring dynamic capabilities, intellectual capital and innovation performance relationship: evidence from the garment manufacturing. Business: Theory and Practice, 20, 123-136. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2019.12
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2026 Charles Bonny Opio, Dr. John Tarus, Dr. Andrew Kimwolo

Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0.













