Stakeholder engagement and public procurement performance of state corporations in Kenya: An empirical analysis

Benson Mugoh Miano; Denis Chege; Charles Ndeto

doi:10.51867/ajernet.7.3.21

Auteurs

Benson Mugoh Miano Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT), Kenya https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9230-6434
Denis Chege Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT), Kenya
Charles Ndeto Kenya School of Government

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.3.21

Mots-clés :

End User Involvement, Internal Departmental Collaboration, Procurement Performance, Stakeholder Engagement, State Corporations, Supplier Engagement

Résumé

Public procurement is one of the key tools of public administration that allows the government to render the budget into goods, works, and services for citizens. Kenya has a robust legal and institutional framework to govern public procurement processes. Yet the country's performance in public procurement is repeatedly flagged in audits for shortcomings in ensuring value for money. This study investigated the role of stakeholder engagement in the procurement performance of state corporations in Kenya's public sector. Stakeholder engagement was operationalized based on end-user involvement, internal departmental collaboration, and supplier engagement. A positivist philosophy and descriptive cross-sectional research design were used. The 414 state corporations gazetted under Executive Order No. 1 of 2023 constituted the target population. A sample of 203 heads of procurement was selected using cluster proportionate sampling, distributed across 21 ministries. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data from the head of procurement, with an 82.3 percent response rate, and the data were analyzed using SPSS version 24. A Cronbach’s Alpha of .806 was obtained to confirm instrument reliability, and communalities from .570 to .887 were used to determine the instrument's construct validity. Descriptive results showed that stakeholder engagement was generally practiced, with suppliers’ involvement in the tender opening process being most widely reported (M = 4.38), followed by legal department involvement for guidance (M = 4.37), and suppliers’ engagement in post-award product inspection being the least reported (M = 3.70). The results of the inferential analysis showed that stakeholder engagement had a significant and positive impact on procurement performance (R² = .687, F (1,165) = 362.160, B = .690, β = .829, p < .001). As a result, the null hypothesis was rejected. The study found that stakeholder engagement accounts for 68.7 percent of the variation in procurement performance. State corporations need to have formal end-user engagement policies, better interdepartmental coordination, and further engagement with suppliers beyond the award. The Public Procurement Regulatory Authority should include metrics that link to stakeholder engagement within its framework for measuring procurement performance.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Biographies des auteurs

Benson Mugoh Miano, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT), Kenya

Ph.D Researcher, School of Business and Economics
Denis Chege, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT), Kenya

Senior Lecturer, School of Business and Economics
Charles Ndeto, Kenya School of Government

Senior Trainer

Références

Ali, M. I. (2024). A guide for positivist research paradigm: From philosophy to methodology. Ideology Journal, 9(2), 187-196. https://doi.org/10.24191/idealogy.v9i2.596

Amirrudin, M., Nasution, K., & Supahar, S. (2021). Effect of variability on Cronbach's alpha reliability in research practice. Jurnal Matematika, Statistika dan Komputasi, 17(2), 223-230. https://doi.org/10.20956/jmsk.v17i2.11655

Battaglia, M. P., Dillman, D. A., Frankel, M. R., Harter, R., Buskirk, T. D., McPhee, C. B., & Yancey, T. (2016). Sampling, data collection, and weighting procedures for address-based sample surveys. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 4(4), 476-500. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smw025

Borgatta, E. F., & Jackson, D. J. (Eds.). (1981). Factor analysis and measurement in sociological research: A multi-dimensional perspective. SAGE Publications.

Changalima, I. A., & Mdee, A. E. (2023). Procurement skills and procurement performance in public organizations: The mediating role of procurement planning. Cogent Business and Management, 10(1), 2163562. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2163562

Changalima, I. A., Mchopa, A. D., & Ismail, I. J. (2023). Supplier monitoring and procurement performance in Tanzania's public sector: The moderating role of contract management difficulty. IIM Ranchi Journal of Management Studies, 2(1), 16-30. https://doi.org/10.1108/IRJMS-04-2022-0039

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192675

Gomes, R. C., Lisboa, E., Sarturi, G., & Mirapalheta, G. (2024). How has stakeholder theory served the public administration literature? In search of the intellectual structure of the field. Public Management Review, 27(9), 2076-2098. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2323170

Government of Kenya. (2023). Gazette Notice No. 1 of 2023: List of state corporations-Government Printer.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Lackey, N. R., & Wingate, A. L. (2021). The pilot study: One key to research success. In P. J. Brink & M. J. Wood (Eds.), Advanced design in nursing research (2nd ed., pp. 375-386). SAGE Publications.

https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452204840.n15

Mahardini, D.F., Kasenda, I., Afgani, M.W., & Isnaini, M. (2024). Quantitative Research Philosophy in Research Methodology. JUPE: Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala, 9(4), 1135-1143.

https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v9i4.7830

Maksimovic, J., & Evtimov, B. (2023). Positivism and post-positivism as the basis of quantitative research in pedagogy. Research in Pedagogy, 13(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5937/IstrPed2301208M

Merisalo, M., Hyytinen, K., Oksanen, J., Pihlajamaa, M., & Uyarra, E. (2024). Navigating the multiple views of value in assessing public procurement. Science and Public Policy, 51(3), 463-476. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad085

Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (2003). Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. African Center for Technology Studies.

Musyoka, F. M., Namusonge, G. S., & Musau, E. G. (2025). The performance of procurement functions in public universities in Kenya: Assessing the potential influence of supplier development. International Journal of Supply Chain and Logistics, 9(5), 36-54. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijscl.2857

Obura, C. O., Shale, N. I., & Mukanzi, C. (2023). Tender evaluation process and operational performance of service state corporations in Kenya. International Journal of Supply Chain and Logistics, 7(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijscl.1167

Office of the Auditor General. (2024). Auditor General's summary report on national government 2023/2024. Office of the Auditor General, Republic of Kenya. https://www.oagkenya.go.ke

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2023). Public procurement performance: A framework for measuring efficiency, compliance and strategic goals (OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 36). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/0dde73f4-en

Prasetyo, A. A., & Isnowati, S. (2025). The influence of procurement planning and HR competence on procurement budget effectiveness through mediation of compliance with procurement regulations. International Journal of Economics and Management Research, 4(2), 823-837. https://doi.org/10.55606/ijemr.v4i2.564

Public Procurement Regulatory Authority. (2024). Kenya's public procurement system: Key findings from the 2024 MAPS assessment. PPRA. https://ppra.go.ke/2024-maps-report

Ragab, M. A., & Arisha, A. (2018). Research methodology in business: A starter's guide. Management and Organizational Studies, 5(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5430/mos.v5n1p1

Sarturi, G., Barakat, S. R., & Gomes, R. C. (2023). Stakeholder theory in the public sector domain: A bibliometric analysis and future research agenda. Review of Policy Research, 40(5), 736-756. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12560

Sataloff, R. T., & Vontela, S. (2021). Response rates in survey research. Journal of Voice, 35(5), 683-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.12.043

Siedlecki, S. L. (2020). Understanding descriptive research designs and methods. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 34(1), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000493

Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling methods in research methodology: How to choose a sampling technique for research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 5(2), 18-27.

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035

Torvinen, H., & Haukipuro, L. (2018). New roles for end-users in innovative public procurement: case study on user engaging property procurement. Public Management Review, 20(10), 1444-1464. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1400581

Transparency International. (2024). Corruption Perceptions Index 2024. Transparency International. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2024

Uddin, S., Ong, S., & Matous, P. (2023). Stakeholder engagement variability across public, private, and public-private partnership projects: A data-driven network-based analysis. PLOS ONE, 18(1), e0279916. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279916

Waci, J. M., Kariuki, P. W., & Mwirigi, P. M. (2024). Procurement practices and value for money in state corporations in Kenya. PLOS ONE, 19(6), e0303879. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303879

Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper and Row.