Assessing the influence of government policies in mitigating climate change effects on tourism and rural livelihoods in Zambia’s Chiawa Chiefdom in lower Zambezi
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.3.14Mots-clés :
Adaptive Capacity, Conservation, Climate Change, Government Policy, Rural Livelihoods, TourismRésumé
This study examined the influence of government policies in mitigating the effects of climate change on tourism and rural livelihoods in Chiawa Chiefdom, Lower Zambezi, Zambia. A qualitative research design was employed with 30 semi-structured interviews with tourism operators, key tourism stakeholders, and local community members who are directly affected by climate variability and conservation policies from the five zones commonly known as village action groups (VAGS) which included Chisakila, Kambale, Chitende, Chiyaba and Mugulameno. This study was guided by Climate Vulnerability Theory. Interview data were transcribed verbatim, thematically analyzed, and processed using NVivo software. Study findings reveal that, although Zambia has established climate change and conservation policy frameworks, their effectiveness at the local level is constrained by low awareness, weak implementation, inadequate financial and technical support, and limited institutional coordination. Tourism operators demonstrated moderate knowledge of relevant policies due to regulatory engagement, whereas rural community members exhibited limited understanding and minimal participation in decision-making processes, reducing local ownership and resilience. Practical adaptation support, including climate-resilient infrastructure and risk management measures, was found to be insufficient, with communities often bearing the financial burden. Additionally, conservation policies sometimes created unintended livelihood challenges through restrictions on resource use, lack of compensation for wildlife-related losses, and limited alternative livelihood options. Institutional fragmentation and poor coordination among government agencies, Non-Governmental Organizations [NGOs], tourism operators, and community structures further weakened policy impact. The study concludes that adaptive capacity in Chiawa is constrained more by governance and implementation challenges than by the absence of policies. Strengthening resilience requires integrated, participatory, and well-resourced approaches that balance conservation objectives with community livelihoods, while promoting sustainable tourism development.
Téléchargements
Références
Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 268-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
Adger, W. N., Arnell, N. W., & Tompkins, E. L. (2005). Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environmental Change, 15(2), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Bandyopadhyay, S., & Tembo, G. (2010). Household consumption and natural resource management around national parks in Zambia. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 2(1), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/19390450903350838
Becken, S., & Hay, J. E. (2007). Tourism and climate change: Risks and opportunities. Channel View Publications. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781845410681
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441-473.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
Füssel, H. M. (2007). Vulnerability: A generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Global Environmental Change, 17(2), 155-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.05.002
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Gummesson, E. (2000). Qualitative methods in management research (2nd ed.). Sage.
Heffernan, A. (2026). A call for wildlife conservation policy evolution: Climate change and community-based natural resource management. Climate and Development, 18(1), 78-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2025.2491540
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2001). Climate change 2001: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2007). Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546013
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2014). Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. IPCC.
Kukkurainen, H. I., & Sonneveld, B. G. J. S. (2025). Assessment of Sámi food security in Finnish Lapland: Climate change impacts and policy effectiveness. International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 84(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2025.2516310
Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2005). Practical research: Planning and design (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658
Mubita, K., Milupi, I., Kalimaposo, K., & Monde, P. N. (2023). Responding to challenges in tourism in the era of climate change in Zambia. International Journal of Education and Social Science Research, 6(2), 129-139. https://doi.org/10.37500/IJESSR.2023.6212
Namasani, M., & Mubanga, K. (2022). Linking local institutional coordination to climate change adaptation in the agriculture sector: Insights from Mkushi District, Zambia.
Ngoma, H., Finn, A., & Kabisa, M. (2024). Climate shocks, vulnerability, resilience, and livelihoods in rural Zambia. Climate and Development, 16(6), 490-501. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2023.2246031
Nyirenda, V. R., Myburgh, W. J., Reilly, B. K., Phiri, A., & Harry, N. (2013). Wildlife crop damage valuation and conservation: Conflicting perceptions by local farmers in the Luangwa Valley, eastern Zambia. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 5, 741-750. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJBC12.026
Policy Monitoring and Research Centre. (2017). Climate change adaptation in Zambia: A review of the National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA) and policy implementation challenges. Policy Monitoring and Research Centre.
Ribot, J. C. (2010). Vulnerability does not fall from the sky: Toward multiscale, pro-poor climate policy. In R. Mearns & A. Norton (Eds.), Social dimensions of climate change: Equity and vulnerability in a warming world (pp. 47-74). World Bank.
Scott, D., Hall, C. M., & Gössling, S. (2012). Tourism and climate change: Impacts, adaptation, and mitigation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203127490
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2023). The Paris Agreement. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
World Bank. (2023). Climate-resilient transport and infrastructure for sustainable development. World Bank Group.
Zambia Meteorological Department. (2023). Agro-meteorological bulletin and seasonal climate outlook for Zambia 2023/2024. Ministry of Green Economy and Environment.
Zhu, Y., Chai, S., Chen, J., & Phau, I. (2024). How was rural tourism developed in China? Examining the impact of China's evolving rural tourism policies. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 28945-28969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03850-5
Téléchargements
Publiée
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Copyright Elliot Goledema, Dr. Liberty Mweemba, Dr. Mirriam Sampa Moonga 2026

Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.













