Socio-economic systems and environmental dynamics of charcoal production in Kintampo, Ghana
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.2.106Mots-clés :
charcoal production, socio-ecological systems, environmental degradation, rural livelihoods, deforestation, public health, Ghana, Kintampo, sustainable development.Résumé
Grounded in the Socio-Ecological Systems (SES) theory, this study examined the systemic socio-economic, ecological, and health implications of charcoal production in the Kintampo Municipality of Ghana’s Bono East region. Despite its central role in rural livelihoods, charcoal production in Kintampo generates severe and interlinked environmental, health, and socio-economic consequences. Deforestation, soil degradation, biodiversity loss, and respiratory disease are well documented in comparable West African contexts, yet systematic empirical evidence that integrates these dimensions remains limited, particularly in the Kintampo area. This study addresses that gap using a sequential explanatory mixed methods design that combined quantitative household surveys with qualitative focus group discussions and key informant interviews. The target population of the study comprises households and institutional actors within the Kintampo Municipality who are directly or indirectly involved in the charcoal production value chain. A stratified random sampling technique was used to select 200 households, with stratification based on socio-economic and occupational strata to ensure adequate representation. To obtain information on the socio-economic impact of charcoal production, 15 key informants were purposively selected for in-depth interviews. Four focus group discussions were conducted with 8–10 participants in each group. A two-pronged analytical strategy was used, integrating quantitative and qualitative data processing to provide a comprehensive interpretation of the dynamics of the system. The study established the importance of charcoal production as a key component of the rural economy, with about 62% of households relying on the activity for more than half of their annual income. The study also revealed the significant environmental impacts of the activity, such as deforestation (71%), depletion of soil nutrients (64%) and loss of biodiversity (58%). Significant health impacts were also observed, with 49% of the respondents reporting respiratory problems and 36% injuries related to the activity. Correlation analysis revealed a strong positive association (r = 0.61, p < 0.01) between the intensity of charcoal production and household income, while regression analysis confirmed that higher levels of production are significantly associated with environmental degradation (β = 0.47, p < 0.001). The study concludes that charcoal production simultaneously reinforces short-term economic resilience and undermines long-term environmental sustainability and public health. It recommends promoting alternative livelihoods, community-based reforestation programmes, the distribution of improved cookstoves and protective equipment, and stronger enforcement of forestry regulations, all aligned with Ghana’s commitments to SDGs 1, 3, 7, 13, and 15.
Téléchargements
Références
Acheampong, E., Insaidoo, T. F., & Ros-Tonen, M. A. F. (2016). Management of Ghana's modified Taungya system: Challenges and strategies for improvement. Agroforestry Systems, 90(3), 659-674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9946-7
Agyeman, K. O., Amponsah, O., & Braimah, I. (2019). Charcoal production and its socio-economic and environmental implications in the Ashanti Region of Ghana. In M. Barra, M. Nardone, & O. Petricca (Eds.), Environmental and socioeconomic impacts of charcoal production in West Africa (pp. 45-62). International Development Research Centre.
Arko, T., Mensah, A., Obani, P., Adomako, J., & Fatima, D. (2024). The charcoal footprint of Greater Accra on the Afram Plains: Urban energy consumption and forest degradation in Ghana. Trees, Forests and People, 15, Article 100678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100678
Arnold, M., Köhler, B., & Persson, R. (2006). Woodfuels, livelihoods, and policy interventions: Changing perspectives. World Development, 34(3), 596-611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.08.008
Babbie, E. (2014). The practice of social research (14th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Binder, C., Hinkel, J., Bots, P. W. G., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2013). Comparison of frameworks for analyzing social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 18(4), Article 26. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05551-180426
Chidumayo, E. N., & Gumbo, D. J. (2012). The environmental impacts of charcoal production in tropical ecosystems of the world: A synthesis. Energy for Sustainable Development, 17(2), 86-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2012.07.004
Cumming, G. S., Biggs, R., Peterson, G. D., & Schlüter, M. (2020). Applying resilience thinking: Seven principles for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Cambridge University Press.
Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80-88.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186
Folke, C., Biggs, R., Norström, A. V., Reyers, B., & Rockström, J. (2016). Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecology and Society, 21(3), Article 41. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08748-210341
Ghana Energy Commission. (2021). National energy statistics 2000-2020. Energy Commission of Ghana.
Haider, L. J., Boonstra, W. J., Peterson, G. D., & Schlüter, M. (2018). Traps and sustainable development in rural social-ecological systems. Global Environmental Change, 49, 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.003
Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design. Field Methods, 18(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260
Kuunibe, N., Issahaku, H., & Nkegbe, P. K. (2013). Wood-based biomass fuel consumption in the Upper West region of Ghana: Implications for environmental sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Development Studies, 3(2), 181-198.
Makonese, T., Ifegbesan, A. P., & Rampedi, I. T. (2018). Household cooking fuel use patterns and determinants across Southern Africa: Evidence from the Demographic and Health Survey data. Energy & Environment, 29(1), 29-48. https://www.jstor.org/stable/90018235
https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X17739475
Marfo, E., Acheampong, E., & Opuni-Frimpong, E. (2012). Fractured tenure, unaccountable authority, and benefit capture: Constraints to improving community benefits under climate change mitigation schemes in Ghana. Conservation and Society, 10(2), 161-172. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.97488
Mensah, J. T., & Adu, G. (2015). An empirical analysis of household energy choice in Ghana. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 51, 1402-1411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.050
Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419-422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133
Rocha, J. C., Peterson, G., Bodin, Ö., & Levin, S. (2018). Cascading regime shifts within and across scales. Science, 362(6421), 1379-1383. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat7850
Sepp, S. (2014). Wood energy: Renewable, profitable and modern. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH. https://www.ctc-n.org/sites/www.ctc-n.org/files/resources/hera_wood_energy_2014.pdf
World Health Organization. (2020). WHO guidelines on indoor air quality: Household fuel combustion. WHO Press.
Zulu, L. C. (2010). The forbidden fuel: Charcoal, urban woodfuel demand and supply dynamics, community forest management and woodfuel policy in Malawi. Energy Policy, 38(7), 3717-3730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.050
Zulu, L. C., & Richardson, R. B. (2013). Charcoal, livelihoods, and poverty reduction: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Energy for Sustainable Development, 17(2), 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2012.07.007
Téléchargements
Publiée
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Copyright Prince Bioh, Manual Selvaraj Bexci 2026

Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.













