Examining students’ perceptions of online and HyFlex teaching modalities and their influence on learning engagement at University X

Navin Imbova Mackatiani; Eunice Majanga; Benard Amwayi

doi:10.51867/ajernet.7.4.42

Authors

Navin Imbova Mackatiani Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kenya https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4427-6389
Eunice Majanga Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kenya https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2980-3080
Benard Amwayi Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kenya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.4.42

Keywords:

COVID-19, Higher Education, HyFlex Teaching, Kenya, Learning Modalities, Online Learning, Slovin's Formula, Student Perception, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Technology Integration

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic drastically changed Higher Education, and universities around the world had to implement online teaching and HyFlex teaching methods urgently. The study considers students' perception of these modalities and how they affect their engagement in learning at University X, which is a major public institution in Kenya. This study examines the online and HyFlex teaching modes on students' behavioral, emotional, cognitive, and social engagement based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which suggests that perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness drive technology adoption. Both qualitative and quantitative data collection methods were used: structured surveys, semi-structured interviews, and focus group discussions. The study focused on 312 undergraduate students, 31 lecturers, and 10 academic administrators. Participants were selected using purposive sampling for those who had direct experience with online and HyFlex courses, and Slovin's formula was used to calculate the sample size for the students. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze survey responses, and thematic analysis was used to analyze qualitative data. The findings show that both online and HyFlex are seen as valued for their flexibility, but that HyFlex teaching (which combines in-person and online learning) leads to greater engagement than online-only teaching in all three areas. Technology infrastructure, internet connection, and lecturer preparation were determined to have a significant impact on the students' engagement. The study shows that HyFlex teaching is more effective in engaging students than only online teaching and concludes that University X should invest in digital infrastructure, offer more training for lecturers, and increase the usage of HyFlex teaching in other Faculties to cater to diverse student learning needs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2023). COVID-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 863-875. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180

Aderinoye, R. A., Ojokheta, K. O., & Olojede, A. A. (2007). Integrating mobile learning into nomadic education programme in Nigeria: Issues and perspectives. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 8(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v8i2.347

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall.

Akala, B. M. M. (2021). Revisiting education reform in Kenya: A case of competency-based curriculum (CBC). Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), Article 100107.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100107

Athens, W. (2023). Self-regulation, motivation, and outcomes in HyFlex classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(4), 1765-1783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10243-y

Barr, T., & Luo, T. (2024). HyFlex course design in community colleges: Instructors' challenges, strategies, and supports. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2024.2415709

Beatty, B. (2019). Hybrid-flexible course design. EdTech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/hyflex

https://doi.org/10.59668/33

Bowers, J., & Kumar, P. (2015). Students' perceptions of teaching and social presence: A comparative analysis of face-to-face and online learning environments. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 10(1), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.2015010103

Buckley, J. B., Thompson, A. K., Tretter, T. R., Biesecker, C., Robinson, B. S., & Hammond, A. N. (2024). "Where I feel the most connected": Community of Inquiry supporting sense of belonging in a HyFlex engineering course. The Internet and Higher Education, 60, Article 100930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2023.100930

Cheung, K. L., & Wu, H. (2023). The use of blended synchronous learning for property education in and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Property Management, 41(2), 228-243. https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-11-2021-0086

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018

Finlay, M. J., Tinnion, D. J., & Simpson, T. (2022). A virtual versus blended learning approach to higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: The experiences of a sport and exercise science student cohort. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 30, Article 100363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100363

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071

Joji, R. M. (2022). Perception of online and face-to-face microbiology laboratory sessions among medical students and faculty at Arabian Gulf University: A mixed-method study. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03346-2

Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. (2018). Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 58-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197

Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2021). Adopting HyFlex in higher education in response to COVID-19: Students' perspectives. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 36(3), 231-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2021.1906641

Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1997(74), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.7401

Mudau, P. K., Biccard, P., Van Wyk, M. M., Kotze, C. J., & Nkuna, V. K. (2022). Student access to and competence in migrating to a fully online open distance learning space. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 21, 197-215. https://doi.org/10.28945/4976

Mwaniki, E., Ireri, A., Chege, F., & Njihia, M. (2020). Obstacles to successful uptake of open distance and e-learning (ODeL) programmes: A case of Kenyatta University, Kenya. African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research, 1(1), 12-22. https://doi.org/10.71064/spu.amjr.1.1.66

Ng, D. K. T. (2022). Online aviation learning experience during the COVID-19 pandemic in Hong Kong and Mainland China. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 443-474.

https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13185

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). OECD digital education outlook 2023: Towards an effective digital education ecosystem. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c74f03de-en