Egypt’s national security strategy and its effectiveness in sustaining stability in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden: Addressing hybrid maritime threats and regional competition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.4.10Keywords:
Egypt, Gulf of Aden, Hybrid Maritime Threats, Maritime Domain Awareness, Maritime Security, National Security Strategy, Naval Modernization, Red Sea, Regional Security, Strategic CompetitionAbstract
The Red Sea and Gulf of Aden are strategically vital maritime corridors connecting Africa, Asia, and Europe, and are increasingly affected by geopolitical rivalry, maritime insecurity, hybrid threats, and military competition. These developments carry significant implications for Egypt's national security, economic interests, and the security of the Suez Canal. This study assessed the effectiveness of Egypt's national security strategy in sustaining stability in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden between 2015 and 2025, with particular attention to hybrid maritime threats and regional strategic competition. The study adopted a descriptive mixed-methods research design, employing structured questionnaires, semi-structured key informant interviews, and documentary analysis. Data were obtained from 125 valid respondents drawn from military, diplomatic, academic, strategic research, and maritime institutions. Realist Theory and Regional Security Complex Theory guided the interpretation of the findings. The findings indicate that Egypt has progressively shifted from a predominantly reactive and territorially oriented maritime posture towards a proactive, multifaceted security strategy characterized by naval modernization, forward maritime deployment, strategic diplomacy, regional cooperation, and technology-enabled maritime domain awareness. Approximately 89.6% of respondents reported that naval modernization has contributed profoundly to regional stability, while 83.2% identified forward maritime deployment as important for protecting strategic maritime chokepoints. In addition, 69.6% recognized the significant contribution of artificial intelligence and digital technologies to maritime security, while 71.2% identified hybrid threats as a major risk to long-term regional stability. The study concludes that Egypt's strategy has strengthened maritime deterrence and contributed to regional stability, but that sustainable security cannot be achieved through military capabilities alone. It requires integrated institutional coordination, cyber resilience, technological innovation, economic resilience, regional diplomacy, and cooperative maritime governance.
Downloads
References
Al Esbili, F. M. (2026). The Red Sea region as an arena for the new rivalry between regional powers: An analysis of the strategies of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Turkey, and Qatar. History and Modern Perspectives, 8(1), 175-182. https://doi.org/10.33693/2658-4654-2026-8-1-175-182
Bueger, C., & Edmunds, T. (2017). Beyond seablindness: A new agenda for maritime security studies. International Affairs, 93(6), 1293-1311. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix174
Bueger, C., & Edmunds, T. (2024). Understanding maritime security. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197767146.001.0001
Buzan, B., & Wæver, O. (2003). Regions and powers: The structure of international security. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491252
Fahmy, N. M. (2022). Characterization of amylase-producing Streptomyces sp. NAA-28 isolated from mangrove sediment, Red Sea, Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology & Fisheries, 26(4), 1053-1065.
https://doi.org/10.21608/ejabf.2022.256201
International Crisis Group. (2025). Calming the Red Sea's turbulent waters.
Kraska, J. (2011). Maritime power and the law of the sea: Expeditionary operations in world politics. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199773381.001.0001
Mazarr, M. J. (2018). Understanding deterrence. RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/PE295
Melvin, N. J. (2019). The foreign military presence in the Horn of Africa region. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. Knopf.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2086875
Opeoluwa, O., & Abdelsalam, E. (2025). Great power competition (GPC) and its implications for Africa's evolving security architecture. Journal of Xidian University. https://doi.org/10.5281/Zenodo.16847448
Thean, P., & Clive, S. (2010). Poverty, poaching and pirates: Geopolitical instability and maritime insecurity off the Horn of Africa. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, 6, 86-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/19480881.2010.489673
Till, G. (2018). Seapower: A guide for the twenty-first century (4th ed.). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315621210
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2023). Global Maritime Crime Programme: Annual report 2023. https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/piracy/index.html
Vertin, Z. (2019). Red Sea rivalries: The Gulf, the Horn, and the new geopolitics of the Red Sea. Brookings Institution.
Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of international politics. Addison-Wesley.
World Bank. (2025). The deepening Red Sea shipping crisis: Impacts and outlook (MENA FCV Economic Series Brief No. 2). https://hdl.handle.net/10986/42787
Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper & Row.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mohamed Ali Rehab

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.













