Model for career pathway prediction for Kenya’s competency-based education curriculum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.3.139Keywords:
Random Forest Algorithm, Competency-Based Education, Career pathway selection , Machine Learning (ML)Abstract
Kenya’s Competency-Based Education (CBE) curriculum puts an emphasis on learning based on project work, co-curricular activities involvement and continuous evaluation of the learner to influence learners into the most suitable career pathway. However, the choice of career pathway of learners in junior secondary schools in Kenya greatly relies on the manual judgment of the teacher and parent, which may be subjective, lack consistency and inconsiderate of the learning context. Therefore, there needs a consistent data-driven tool that combines both academic and non-academic pointers, based on actual school data, to advise on career pathway selection and that utilizes Machine Learning to inform the choice of the learner, teacher and parent. The main objective of the paper was to develop a Machine Learning model that can help select the most suitable career pathway for the learner under the Competency-Based Education curriculum. In specific the study aimed to: review existing literature to recognize the factors considered in the determination of the career pathway choice of the student; to analyze data to determine the most consequential factors that influence the career pathway choice of the student; develop a model to predict the career pathway choice using Random Forest algorithm; and to assess and validate the model’s ability to predict the individual’s career pathway. The study used a quantitative experimental research design, with data of 1,083 students gathered from databases in junior secondary schools in the county of Trans-Nzoia, involving both public and private schools. The data included the academic scores, project marks, extra-curricular participation, leadership involvement, gender and the school type, functioning as the mediating variable The data was cleaned, standardized, split into 80:20 training-testing set. Random Forest feature-importance recognized 7 most influential features as Integrated Science (29.89%), Agriculture (16.60%), Pre-Technical Studies (10.47%), Mathematics (8.63%), Sports (7.38%), Music and Drama (5.12%) and the type of school (4.84%). The features together accounted for 82.92% of all feature importance. The dataset was trained using three Machine Learning algorithms. Random Forest was the best performing model with an accuracy of 89%, compared to Decision Trees with 81.46% and 78% for Neural Networks. However, Decision Trees and Neural Networks had a better stability on ten-fold cross-validation, where Random Forest had an accuracy score of 86%, 82% for Decision Tree and 78.62% for Neural Network. The Random Forest model recorded AUC score of 0.90, 0.97 and 0.98 for Arts, Social Science and STEM in that order, which illustrates very good discriminative ability. The study in conclusion states that academic performance, extra-curricular participation and school environment are collectively useful in forecasting career pathway choice of students. The final result is a dependable evidence-driven decision-support system – the Random Forest career pathway prediction model, which enhances objectivity and equality in selection of a clear pathway for the student under the CBE curriculum. The tool serves as a complimentary system for career pathway selection and not as a replacement of professional career guidance. The paper suggests future studies to be done in other counties and inclusion of the interests of the student, parents and other primary statistics considered.
Downloads
References
Baradwaj, B. K., & Pal, S. (2011). Mining educational data to analyze students' performance. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 2(6), 63-69.
https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2011.020609
Berlikozha, B., Serek, A., Amirgaliyev, B., Baishemirov, Z., & Zhamanov, A. (2025a). Identification of key features for career prediction through recursive feature elimination. Bulletin of Abai KazNPU. Series of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, 90(2), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.51889/2959-5894.2025.90.2.016
Berlikozha, B., Serek, A., Zhukabayeva, T., Zhamanov, A., & Dias, O. (2025b). Development of method to predict career choice of IT students in Kazakhstan by applying machine learning methods. Journal of Robotics and Control, 6(1), 426-436. https://doi.org/10.18196/jrc.v6i1.25558
Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674028845
Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press.
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143(1), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009). The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction (2nd ed.). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7
Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Psychological Assessment Resources.
Kenya Institute of Curriculum Development. (2017). Basic education curriculum framework: Nurturing every learner's potential. https://kicd.ac.ke/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/CURRICULUMFRAMEWORK.pdf
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79-122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
Liu, R., & Tan, A. (2020). Towards interpretable automated machine learning for STEM career prediction. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 12(2), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4008073
Mgala, M. (2016). Investigating prediction modelling of academic performance for students in rural schools in Kenya [Doctoral dissertation, University of Cape Town]. https://hdl.handle.net/11427/23463
Ministry of Education. (2019). National education sector strategic plan 2018-2022. Government of Kenya.
Oduor, A. (2022, April 25). We are ready for CBC shift, ministry says. The Standard.
Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2013). Data mining in education. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 3(1), 12-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1075
Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2020). Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 10(3), e1355. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1355
Urlamma, D., Naga Vasavi, T., Sucharitha, N., Supriya, P., & Aaisha, S. (2025). Smart career advisor using machine learning. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 13(4), 5308-5312. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2025.69537
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Innocent Wamalwa Barasa, Raphael Angulu , Collins Odoyo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.













