Dynamics of Marketing Communication Platforms Used by Farmers to Access Information on Agriculture in Kakamega County, Kenya

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.4.2.132

Keywords:

Access to Information, Agricultural Information, Communication Platforms, Farm Inputs, Marketing Communication

Abstract

Agriculture is fundamental to Kenya’s development as anchored in the in the Bottom-Up Economic blue print and Vision 2030. Despite the increasing promotional attempts by marketers, manufacturers and even government agencies, agricultural production is marred by low outputs, low uptake of farm inputs such as fertilizer, quality seeds, equipment, chemicals, and reluctance in adopting new agricultural innovations. The presence of various marketing communication approaches, several information platforms, and financial incentives to the clientele notwithstanding, the uptake of farm inputs is still very low. The objective of this study was to describe the dynamics of integrated marketing communication platforms that are used by farmers in accessing information on agriculture. The Uses and Gratifications Theory by Katz, Blumler, and Gurevitch was adopted because of its ability to examine diverse media and communication channel preferences among audiences. The theory advances the use of alterative media platforms where traditional ones are not effective. The researcher relied on Mixed-methods in actualizing the study. Simple random sampling was used to get 259 farmers, while purposive sampling was used to select Agricultural Society of Kenya officials and agricultural extension officers. Six agro-dealers were randomly selected while quota sampling was used to get media personnel. Data were collected through questionnaires, interviews, and focus group discussions. Qualitative and quantitative approaches were used in analysis and organization of results. Findings were presented descriptively and complemented by graphs, tables, percentages, and charts. This enabled the researcher to draw inferences that later informed the conclusions of the study which indicate that participants had access to multiple marketing communication platforms that they relied upon to access information on agriculture. The channels included both traditional and new media platforms such as radio, TV, SMS, interpersonal communication, and public barazas, which were effective in sharing information on agriculture. The study recommended the following; embracement of targeted marketing; empowerment of Agricultural field officers and increase collaborations with vibrant agricultural organizations; make use of integrated communication platforms that meet regional needs; utilization of social media to advertise; and finally, embrace continuous provision of agricultural information at all times.

References

Armstrong, C. B., & Rubin, A. M. (1989). Talk radio as interpersonal communication. Journal of Communication, 39(2), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1989.tb01031.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1989.tb01031.x

Ayten, A., Bulat, S., & Inceismail, E. (2019). A study of generation Z viewing habits in context of uses and gratification theory. The Protector Netflix Series Case Communication and Technology Congress -CTC 2019.

https://doi.org/10.7456/ctc_2019_01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7456/ctc_2019_01

Banerjee, A. & Munshi, K., (2004). How efficiently is capital allocated? Evidence from the knitted garment industry in Tirupur. The Review of Economic Studies, 71(1), 19-42.

https://doi.org/10.1111/0034-6527.00274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0034-6527.00274

Bartosik-Purgat, M. (2019). Digital Marketing Communication from the Perspective of Individual Consumers: A Cross-Country Comparison. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(3), 205-220. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2019.070311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2019.070311

Lukungu, C. (2020). Effectiveness of communication channels in dissemination of fall armyworm information on maize production. A case of Kakamenga County in Kenya. Thesis, University of Nairobi.

Farooq, S., Muhammad, S., Chauhdary, K., & Ashraf, I. (2007). Role of print media in the dissemination of agricultural information among farmers. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 44.

Floreddu, P.B., & Cabiddu, F. (2016). Social media communication strategies. Journal of Services Marketing, 30(5), 490-503. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-01-2015-0036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-01-2015-0036

GoK, (2007). Kenyan Vision 2030. Nairobi: Government Printer.

Katz, E., Blumer, J.G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509-523.

https://doi.org/10.1086/268109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/268109

Kemp, S. (2018). Digital in 2018: World's internet users pass the 4 billion mark. Retrieved from: https://wearesocial.com/blog/2018/01/global-digital-report-2018.

Lasswell, H.D.(2012). The structure and function of communication in society. In: Schramm, W. & Roberts, D.F. (eds). The Process and Effects of Mass Communication. Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana, Chicago, USA.

Ludwig, S., & De Ruyter, K. (2016). Decoding social media speak: developing a speech act theory research agenda. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(2), 124-134. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-04-2015-1405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-04-2015-1405

Mittal, Gandhi, & G. Tripathi, (2020). "Socio-Economic Impact of Mobile Phones on Indian Agriculture." Working paper 246. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations. New Delhi.

Mixed Methods Research (2018). Scandinavian journal of educational research, 56(2), 155-165.

Mugenda, O., & Mugenda, G., (2013). Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Evised Eds. Nairobi. Acts press Kenya.

Muhammad, S., Garforth, C., & Almas, A. R. (2011). "Adoption of Recommended Agricultural Technologies by Farmers as an Indicator of Effective Communication by Extension Field Staff". International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 3(1), 13-15.

Muriuki, N., Munyua, C., & Wanga, D., (2016). "Communication Channels in Adoption of Technology with a Focus on the Use of Purdue Improved Crop Storage (PICS) among Small Scale Maize Farmers in Kenya". Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 6(18), 2016.

Muyanga, M., & Jayine, T.S., (2016). Agricultural extension in Kenya: Practice and Policy Lessons. Egerton University. Tegemeo institute of agricultural policy and development.

Nisbet, M.C., & Scheufele, D.A., (2019). What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany, 96(10), 1767-1778.

https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900041

Nowak, M., and Phelps, V., (1994), "Brand equity: the halo effect measure". European Journal of Marketing, 29(4), 57-66.

https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569510086657 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569510086657

Huyer, S., & Partey, S. (2020). Weathering the storm or storming the norms? Moving gender equality forward in climate-resilient agriculture. Climatic Change, 158, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02612-5

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02612-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02612-5

Osman T. D., Ansah, I. G. K., (2020). Effects of technology dissemination approaches on agricultural technology uptake and utilization in Northern Ghana. Technology in Society, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101294 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101294

Porcu, L., Barrio-García, S. D., & Kitchen, P. J. (2012). How Integrated Marketing Communications (IMC) works? A theoretical review and an analysis of its main drivers and effects. Comunicacion y Sociedad, 25(1), 313-348

https://doi.org/10.15581/003.25.36183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/003.25.36183

Reid, D.J., & Reid, F.J.M., (2015). Online Focus Groups: An In-Depth Comparison of Computer-Mediated and Conventional Focus Group Discussions. International Journal of Market Research, 47, 131- 62.

https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530504700204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530504700204

Sedik, P., (2018). Generation marketing in strategic Marketing Management: Case Study of Honey Market. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18(1), 326-337.

https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2018.18.1.24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2018.18.1.24

Simkin, L., & Dibb, S., (2018). Prioritizing target markets. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 16 (7), 407-417.

https://doi.org/10.1108/02634509810244417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02634509810244417

Suri, T. (2011). Selection and Comparative Advantage in Technology Adoption. Econometrica, 79(1), 159-209

https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA7749 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA7749

Susanno, R., Phedra, R., & Murwani, I.A., 2019. The determinant factors of the intention to spend more time binge-watching for Netflix subscriber in Jakarta. Journal of Research in Marketing, 10(3), 807-812.

Taherdoost, H., (2016). Sampling methods in research methodology; how to choose a Sampling Technique for Research: How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 5 (2), 18-27. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035

World Bank. (2015). World Development Indicators. World Bank. Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/

Uwe, D., Aparajita, G., & Deepak, M., (2016). Will Digital Technologies Transform Agriculture in Developing Countries? World Development Report Team & Development Research Group Environment and Energy Team. Available at: http://econ.worldbank.org

Downloads

Published

2023-11-30

How to Cite

Lumbasi, G. J., Anyonje, L., & Wakhungu, J. W. (2023). Dynamics of Marketing Communication Platforms Used by Farmers to Access Information on Agriculture in Kakamega County, Kenya. African Journal of Empirical Research, 4(2), 1314–1323. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.4.2.132