Carnivore diversity in unclassified forests on the right bank of the Aruwimi River in Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.4.125Keywords:
Aruwimi, Bas-Uélé, Carnivores, Diversity, Tshopo, Unclassified ForestsAbstract
The forests of the Congo Basin are home to a wide variety of mammals, but this diversity is under pressure from various human activities, notably hunting, agriculture and logging. In the unclassified forests on the right bank of the Aruwimi river, however, scientific knowledge of carnivores remains limited, particularly regarding their species composition, distribution and relative abundance. The aim of this study is therefore to assess the diversity of carnivores in this region by identifying the species present, analysing their distribution according to location and forest habitat type, and estimating their relative abundance based on presence indices. Carnivore diversity is analysed using ecological niche theory. This study adopts a descriptive and comparative ecological approach, based on field surveys. Surveys were carried out at four sites – Libombo, Dikwa, Bopale and Likati – in 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2025 respectively, with a survey effort of 15 days per site. Data collection combined foot patrols (reconnaissance) with surveys along linear transects. In total, 24 5-km recce routes were covered. Direct observations and indirect evidence, including tracks, droppings and food remains, were used to detect and identify species. The data were analysed using the R software package, employing proportions, chi-squared tests and correspondence analysis. The results show that the composition of carnivore communities differs significantly between sites (χ² = 42.587; p = 0.003547) and between forest types (χ² = 17.332; p = 0.01537). Crossarchus alexandri dominates at Bopale, Dikwa and Likati, whilst Libombo exhibits a more balanced composition, notably featuring Civettictis civetta and Lutra maculicollis. A highly significant association is also observed between species and types of presence indices (χ² = 72.131; p < 0.001), demonstrating the value of combining several categories of indices to detect forest carnivores. The detection of Panthera pardus at Dikwa and Profelis aurata at Likati provides further insight into the composition of the carnivore communities studied. In conclusion, the unclassified forests on the right bank of the Aruwimi river are home to a community of carnivores whose composition varies according to location and habitat characteristics. The combination of direct observations and indirect indices constitutes a relevant approach for their inventory and monitoring, whilst maintaining habitat diversity appears important for the conservation of these communities.
Downloads
References
Chades, I., McDonald-Madden, E., McCarthy, M. A., Wintle, B., Linkie, M., & Possingham, H. P. (2008). When to stop managing or surveying cryptic threatened species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 13936-13940.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805265105
Crawford, J. A., Dreslik, M. J., Baker, S. J., Phillips, C. A., & Peterman, W. E. (2020). Factors affecting the detection of an imperiled and cryptic species. Diversity, 12, Article 177.
https://doi.org/10.3390/d12050177
Fa, J. E., Currie, D., & Meeuwig, J. (2003). Bushmeat and food security in the Congo Basin: Linkages between wildlife and people's future. Environmental Conservation, 30(1), 71-78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892903000067
Fonteyn, D., Vermeulen, C., Gorel, A.-P., Silva de Miranda, P. L., Lhoest, S., & Fayolle, A. (2023). Biogeography of Central African forests: Determinants, ongoing threats and conservation priorities of mammal assemblages. Diversity and Distributions, 29(6), 698-712. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13677
Gaston, K. J. (2000). Biodiversity: Higher taxon richness. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 24(1), 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913300673943469
Gibb, R., Browning, E., Glover-Kapfer, P., & Jones, K. E. (2019). Emerging opportunities and challenges for passive acoustics in ecological assessment and monitoring. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 169-185.
https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13101
Henschel, P., Hunter, L. T. B., Coad, L., Abernethy, K. A., & Mühlenberg, M. (2011). Leopard prey choice in the Congo Basin rainforest suggests exploitative competition with human bushmeat hunters. Journal of Zoology, 285(1), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00826.x
Henschel, P., Malanda, G.-A., & Hunter, L. (2014). The status of savanna carnivores in the Odzala-Kokoua National Park, northern Republic of Congo. Journal of Mammalogy, 95(4), 882-892. https://doi.org/10.1644/13-MAMM-A-306
Hutchinson, G. E. (1957). Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 22, 415-427. https://doi.org/10.1101/SQB.1957.022.01.039
Kamgaing, T. O. W., Dzefack, Z. C. B., & Yasuoka, H. (2019). Declining ungulate populations in an African rainforest: Evidence from local knowledge, ecological surveys, and bushmeat records. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7, Article 249. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00249
Kingdon, J. (2015). The Kingdon field guide to African mammals. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Kingdon, J., Happold, D., Butynski, T. M., Hoffmann, M., Happold, M., & Kalina, J. (Eds.). (2013). Mammals of Africa (Vols. 1-6). Bloomsbury Publishing.
Putman, R. J. (1984). Facts from faeces. Mammal Review, 14(2), 79-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.1984.tb00341.x
Ray, J. C., Hunter, L., & Zigouris, J. (2005). Setting conservation priorities for large African carnivores. Wildlife Conservation Society.
Schilling, A.-K., Mazzamuto, M. V., & Romeo, C. (2022). A review of non-invasive sampling in wildlife disease and health research: What's new? Animals, 12, Article 1719.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12131719
Stephenson, P. (2020). Technological advances in biodiversity monitoring: Applicability, opportunities and challenges. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 45, 36-41.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.08.005
Stuart, C., & Stuart, T. (2013). Tracks and signs of African wildlife. Struik Nature.
Tilman, D. (1994). Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology, 75(1), 2-16. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939377
Walsh, P. D., & White, L. J. T. (1999). What it will take to monitor forest elephant populations. Conservation Biology, 13(6), 1191-1202. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98483.x
Zemanova, M. A. (2019). Poor implementation of non-invasive sampling in wildlife genetics studies. Rethinking Ecology, 4, 119-132.
https://doi.org/10.3897/rethinkingecology.4.32751
Zwerts, J. A., Stephenson, P., Maisels, F., Rowcliffe, M., Astaras, C., Jansen, P. A., Vander Waarde, J., Sterck, L. E., Verweij, P. A., & Bruce, T. (2021). Methods for wildlife monitoring in tropical forests: Comparing human observations, camera traps, and passive acoustic sensors. Conservation Science and Practice, 3, Article e568.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Roger A Angoyo, Jean C. Ngabu, André B. Malekani, Bienvenu N. Ndjoku, Bruno M. Chuma, Moïse A. Bipoo , Michel Y Komba, Aristote W Zepambale , Dr Casimir M. Nebesse, Guy-Crispin T. Gembu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.













