Climate change and agribusiness entrepreneurship in Tanzania: The mediating role of adaptation strategies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.4.79

Keywords:

Adaptation Strategies, Agribusiness Entrepreneurship, Climate Change, Dynamic Capabilities Theory, PLS-SEM, Tanzania

Abstract

Agribusiness entrepreneurship in Tanzania operates within a climate-vulnerable agricultural economy in which rising temperatures, erratic rainfall and recurrent extreme weather events threaten production and business continuity. However, the mechanism through which climate change is transmitted into entrepreneurial outcomes specifically the role played by adaptation strategies remains empirically under examined in the Tanzanian context. This study therefore pursued two objectives: (i) to examine the direct effect of climate change on agribusiness entrepreneurship, and (ii) to assess the mediating role of adaptation strategies in this relationship, drawing on Dynamic Capabilities Theory to frame adaptation strategies as capability-building responses to environmental disruption. A quantitative, cross-sectional design was employed to collect primary data from 252 agribusiness entrepreneurs (smallholder farmers, small and medium enterprises, and start-ups) in Morogoro and Dodoma regions, selected through stratified random sampling. Data were analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). The measurement model satisfied recommended thresholds for indicator reliability, internal consistency, convergent validity and discriminant validity. The structural model revealed that climate change had a significant negative direct effect on agribusiness entrepreneurship (β = -0.143, t = 3.192, p = 0.001) and a significant positive effect on adaptation strategies (β = 0.335, t = 3.559, p < 0.001); adaptation strategies, in turn, exerted a strong positive effect on entrepreneurship (β = 0.922, t = 40.643, p < 0.001). The bootstrapped indirect effect of climate change on entrepreneurship through adaptation strategies was positive and significant (β = 0.309, t = 3.331, p = 0.001), confirming partial mediation. These results indicate that although climate change constrains agribusiness entrepreneurship directly, its net effect depends substantially on entrepreneurs' capacity to adopt adaptive practices that convert climate pressure into resilience and performance. The study extends Dynamic Capabilities Theory to agribusiness entrepreneurship in a developing-economy setting and provides evidence to support policies that strengthen access to climate-resilient technologies, extension training and adaptation finance for agribusiness entrepreneurs, particularly smallholders, women and youth.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

Brüssow, K., Faße, A., & Grote, U. (2017). Implications of climate-smart strategy adoption by farm households for food security in Tanzania. Food Security, 9(6), 1203-1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-017-0694-y

Clark, T., Foster, L., Sloan, L., & Bryman, A. (2021). Bryman's social research methods (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2022). The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2022. FAO.

Gebre, G. G., Amekawa, Y., Fikadu, A. A., & Rahut, D. B. (2023). Do climate change adaptation strategies improve farmers' food security in Tanzania? Food Security, 15(3), 629-647.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-023-01348-6

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

Kurgat, B. K., Lamanna, C., Kimaro, A., Namoi, N., Manda, L., & Rosenstock, T. S. (2020). Adoption of climate-smart agriculture technologies in Tanzania. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4, Article 55. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00055

Linnenluecke, M., & Griffiths, A. (2010). Beyond adaptation: Resilience for business in light of climate change and weather extremes. Business & Society, 49(3), 477-511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650310368814

Linnenluecke, M. K., Griffiths, A., & Winn, M. I. (2013). Firm and industry adaptation to climate change: A review of climate adaptation studies in the business and management field. WIREs Climate Change, 4(5), 397-416. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.214

Mazenda, A., Obi, A., Kisaka-Lwayo, M., & Antwi, M. (2026). Climate change risks and climate adaptation in agro-processing enterprises. Climate Resilience and Sustainability, 5(1), Article e70030. https://doi.org/10.1002/cli2.70030

Mramba, N. R., & Msuya, M. S. (2024). Exploring the usage of digital marketing among selected agricultural marketing co-operatives in Morogoro, Tanzania. African Journal of Empirical Research, 5(3), 934-947. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.5.3.79

Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226. https://doi.org/10.2307/259271

Tanzania Meteorological Agency. (2024). Seasonal climate outlook and impacts on agriculture. TMA.

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z

United Republic of Tanzania. (2023). National agricultural policy 2023. Ministry of Agriculture.

Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917-955. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x

Downloads

Published

2026-10-26

How to Cite

Lubida, L. D., Tundui, H. P., Samwely, R. M., & Hassan, N. (2026). Climate change and agribusiness entrepreneurship in Tanzania: The mediating role of adaptation strategies. African Journal of Empirical Research, 7(4), 972-983. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.4.79