Development planning practices in Zambia: Implications for national development

Sitali Wamundila; Christine Wamunyima Kanyengo; Austin Mwange

doi:10.51867/ajernet.7.1.129

Authors

Sitali Wamundila The University of Zambia, Zambia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2167-7873
Christine Wamunyima Kanyengo The University of Zambia, Zambia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4249-1859
Austin Mwange The University of Zambia, Zambia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8568-3063

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.1.129

Keywords:

Development Planning, National Development, Planning Governance, Planning Capacity, Zambia

Abstract

Every nation aspires to attain the status of a developed country, and the effectiveness of development planning is widely regarded as a principal determinant of differential development outcomes across nations. Since independence in 1964, Zambia has pursued national development through successive development plans; yet, after more than six decades, the country remains classified as a developing nation. This study critically examines the current state of development planning practices in Zambia and their implications for national development. Grounded in a quantitative survey methodology, data were collected from 100 professional planners drawn from a population of 125 attendees at the 9th Conference of Planners convened by the Zambia Institute of Planners in Livingstone. Questionnaires were administered to all 125 conference attendees. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, comprising frequency distributions and percentage tabulations, processed through the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). Findings reveal a bifurcated reality: on the positive side, Zambia exhibits a mature development planning culture characterised by qualified planners, multi-level institutional participation, and broad alignment of national development plans with global development frameworks, including the Sustainable Development Goals. On the deficit side, the study uncovers persistent and systemic weaknesses: an inadequate and poorly understood planning process, limited access to reliable information for plan content, insufficient mastery of planning tools and techniques, weak resource support, deficient monitoring and evaluation frameworks, and fragile governance of the development planning function. These structural deficits, cumulatively, help explain why Zambia has not translated planning effort into substantive development progress. The study advances targeted policy recommendations covering governance reform, capacity building, information infrastructure, and resource allocation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, D. (2002). Education and national development: Priorities, policies, and planning. Asian Development Bank.

Aliyu, M. A., Msughter, A. E., & Nneka, A. Q. (2021). Comparative study of national development plans in Nigeria and India: Media dimension. SIASAT, 8(4), 202-212.

Asian Development Bank. (2013). Cost-benefit analysis for development: A practical guide. Asian Development Bank.

Attah, U. R., Garba, P. M. B., Gil-Ozoudeh, I., & Iwuanyanwu, O. (2024). Leveraging geographic information systems and data analytics for enhanced public sector decision-making and urban planning. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 12(2), 152-163.

https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2024.12.2.0191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2024.12.2.0191

Banda, B., van Niekerk, D., Nemakonde, L., & Granvorka, C. (2022). Integrated development planning in Zambia: Ideological lens, theoretical underpinnings, current practices, views of the planners. Development Southern Africa, 39(3), 338-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2020.1868289

Basheer, M., Nechifor, V., Calzadilla, A., Ringler, C., Hulme, D., & Harou, J. J. (2022). Balancing national economic policy outcomes for sustainable development. Nature Communications, 13, 4779. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32415-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32415-9

Carlsen, J., & Nazal, S. (2008). The district development programme in Tanzania (DDP) (Sida Evaluation 2008:55). Sida.

Chaube, S., Pant, S., Kumar, A., Uniyal, S., Singh, K. M., Kotecha, K., & Kumar, A. (2024). An overview of multi-criteria decision analysis and the applications of AHP and TOPSIS methods. International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences, 9(3), 581-615.

https://doi.org/10.33889/IJMEMS.2024.9.3.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33889/IJMEMS.2024.9.3.030

Chilufya, B. L. (2023). The resourcing of Ward Development Committees (WDCs) and its impact on the effectiveness in executing their functions. Local Government Association of Zambia. https://caritaszambia.org/phocadownload/policy_briefs/Policy-Brief-Paper-on-Resourcing-WDCs.pdf

Chimhowu, A. O., Hulme, D., & Munro, T. L. (2019). The 'new' national development planning and global development goals: Processes and partnerships. World Development, 120, 76-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.03.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.03.013

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

DeLuca, L. (2017). United Nations: Online data repositories and resources. College & Research Libraries News, 78(1), 41-45.

https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.78.1.9607 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.78.1.9607

Dimitriou, H. T., & Thompson, R. (Eds.). (2007). Strategic planning for regional development in the UK (1st ed.). Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203641620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203641620

Erlina, M. A., Kesuma, I. S., Muda, I., & Erwin, K. (2020). Regional development planning in North Sumatera: The effect of conflict of interest. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 11(1), 666-685.

Food and Agriculture Organization & United Nations Development Programme. (2019). Integrating agriculture into national adaptation plans. FAO/UNDP.

Fukuda-Parr, S. (2022). Sustainable development goals (SDGs) and the promise of a transformative agenda. CDP Policy Review Series. United Nations Committee for Development Policy. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003266365-58 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003266365-58

Göçoğlu, V., Düzsöz, E., & Demirko, A. (2025). Challenges and priorities in achieving the sustainable development goals: A multi-scaled global analysis. Sustainable Development, 33, 6247-6259. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3466 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3466

Gumede, W. (2009). Comparative development planning (Development Planning Division Working Paper Series No. 8). Development Bank of Southern Africa.

Hadingham, T. (2003). Decentralisation and development planning: Some practical considerations. International Labour Organization.

Harrison, T. (2023). The resurgence of national development planning and the challenge of alignment. Overseas Development Institute.

Jales, M. (2017). The missing link between economic growth and development: The case of copper-dependent Zambia. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

Japan International Cooperation Agency. (2007). A review of the FNDP, PDP and DDP development processes. Institute for International Cooperation.

Kanyamuna, V., Katowa, T., Mubita, A., Kanenga, H., Simui, F., & Kotze, D. A. (2020). Analysis of structural and organisational arrangements of monitoring and evaluation status for the public sector in Zambia. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(6), 504-527.

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.76.8482 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.76.8482

Kanyamuna, V., Siamabele, B., Phiri, M., Mubita, A., & Kalonje, V. (2023). Planning, monitoring and evaluation arrangements in Zambia's public sector: Shifting sands or a solid rock? Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 10(11), 382-413.

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1011.15905 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1011.15905

Ki, J. (2018). Geographic information system and big data visualization. In IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.82052

https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.82052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.82052

Kismana, A. Z., & Tasar, I. (2014). The key elements of local development. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 1689-1696.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00642-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00642-X

Kostka, G. (2012). Environmental protection bureau leadership at the provincial level in China: Examining diverging career backgrounds and implications for environmental governance. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 16(1), 41-57.

https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2012.752184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2012.752184

Kusek, J. Z., & Rist, R. C. (2004). Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation system: A handbook for development practitioners. World Bank.

National Assembly of Zambia. (2023). Report of the Committee on Cabinet Affairs on the implementation of the National Monitoring and Evaluation Policy in Zambia. Republic of Zambia.

Nwokwu, P. M., & Ndukwe, C. (2021). Development plans as veritable tools for national development: Evidence from Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 10(9), 28-37.

OECD. (2020). Key trends in development co-operation for national data and statistical systems (OECD Development Co-operation Policy Papers No. 31). OECD Publishing.

Onyeaghalaji, N. M., & Igberaese, E. D. (2010). Knowledge management and capacity building for sustainable development in Africa. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 12(2), 268-283.

Örtengren, K. (2016). A guide to results-based management (RBM): Efficient project planning with the aid of the Logical Framework Approach (LFA). Swedish International Development Cooperation.

Petkovic, J., Magwood, O., Lytvyn, L., Khabsa, J., Concannon, W. T., Welch, V., & Tugwell, P. (2023). Key issues for stakeholder engagement in the development of health and healthcare guidelines. Research Involvement and Engagement, 9(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-023-00433-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-023-00433-6

Rasmussen, M. A. (2001). Information and development: The information effect. Information Development, 17(1), 12-18.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666014240629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666014240629

Republic of Uganda. (2020). Third national development plan (NDPIII) 2020/21-2024/25. National Planning Authority.

Republic of Zambia. (1966). First national development plan 1966-1970. Government Printers.

Republic of Zambia. (1996). National capacity building assessment. Ministry of Finance and National Planning.

Republic of Zambia. (2002). Zambia transitional national development plan 2002-2005. Ministry of Finance and National Planning.

Republic of Zambia. (2006). Vision 2030. Government Printers.

Republic of Zambia. (2011). Sixth national development plan 2011-2015. Ministry of Finance and National Planning.

Republic of Zambia. (2014). National planning and budgeting policy: Responsive, transparent, accountable and results-oriented development planning and budgeting processes. Ministry of Finance.

Republic of Zambia. (2017). Seventh national development plan 2017-2021. Ministry of Finance and National Planning.

Republic of Zambia. (2022). Eighth national development plan 2022-2026. Ministry of Finance and National Planning.

Republic of Zambia. (2023). Eighth national development plan-Implementation plan 2022-2026. Ministry of Finance and National Planning.

Royo, G. M., Diep, L., Mulligan, J., Mukanga, P., & Parikh, P. (2022). Linking the UN sustainable development goals and African Agenda 2063: Understanding overlaps and gaps between the global goals and continental priorities for Africa. World Development Sustainability, 1, 100010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2022.100010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2022.100010

Sambumbu, M. A., & Okanga, B. (2016). Integrated strategies for managing the implementation of the national development plan. Journal of Contemporary Management, 13, 866-891.

Srivastava, D. (2023). An introduction to data visualization tools and techniques in various domains. International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, 71(4), 125-130. https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V71I4P116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V71I4P116

Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2011). Economic development (11th ed.). Pearson.

Tran, Q. N., & Carden, L. L. (2022). Work from anywhere: Remote stakeholder management and engagement. Personnel Review, 51(8), 2021-2038. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2021-0808 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2021-0808

Turner, M., & Wangchuk, D. (2025). National development planning and sustainability: The case of Bhutan. Sustainability, 17, 3261.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073261 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073261

United Nations Children's Fund. (2017). Results-based management handbook: Working together for children. UNICEF.

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (1966). Administration of national development planning: Report of a meeting of experts held at Paris, France, 8-19 June 1964. United Nations.

United Nations Development Programme. (2009). Handbook on planning, monitoring and evaluating for development results. UNDP.

United Nations Human Settlements Programme. (2016). Regional development authorities engagement framework for Kenya: Towards a new regional planning model in Kenya. UN-Habitat.

World Bank. (2002). World Bank group private sector development strategy. World Bank.

Zulu, K., Kanyamuna, V., Chunga, K. C., & Simenti-Phiri, E. (2023). The changing paradigms of national development planning: An enigma or a necessity? World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 9(1), 34-47. https://doi.org/10.12691/wjssh-9-1-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12691/wjssh-9-1-5