Promoting information systems interoperability in enhancing compliance with maritime transport rules and regulations in Tanzania

https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.6.4.8

Authors

Keywords:

Compliance Monitoring, Evaluation, Information Systems Interoperability, Regulatory Service Delivery

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate how information systems interoperability can enhance maritime transport compliance monitoring and evaluation in Tanzania, specifically to identify the challenges posed by non-interoperable information systems and to investigate the barriers to achieving interoperability in maritime transport compliance monitoring and evaluation. The Responsive Regulation Theory and the Socio-Economic Theory of Regulatory Compliance guided this research. The study employed a convergent or concurrent design using a mixed-methods approach (qualitative and quantitative research approaches). Simple random sampling was utilized to select 171 respondents using Yamane’s formula for the quantitative component and eleven (11) participants through the purposive sampling technique for the qualitative component. The population comprised 300 individuals from Tanzania Shipping Agencies Corporation (TASAC) as the maritime transport regulator authority and regulated entities, from which, out of the 171 questionnaires issued, 160 were returned, resulting in a response rate of 93 percent, and based on data saturation and consultation with experts, in-depth semi-structured interviews with eleven (11) TASAC employees and compliance officers from regulated entities were used to collect qualitative data. Data were collected through questionnaires, interviews, and document analysis and analyzed using thematic analysis, descriptive analysis, and inferential analysis through ordered logistic regression. Delays in data retrieval, inconsistencies and inaccuracies across information sources, and inefficiencies in compliance reporting are among the critical challenges identified due to non-interoperable information systems. Furthermore, barriers such as information security risks, institutional information system fragmentation, and a lack of harmonized standards were found to significantly hinder the achievement of interoperability. The findings provide valuable insights for the Tanzania Maritime Regulatory Authority (TASAC), policymakers, and industry stakeholders on the need to have collaborative efforts for fostering secure, transparent, and efficient maritime operations through regulatory frameworks alignment, standardizing reporting procedures, integrating platforms such as the National Maritime Single Window (NMSW) and the Port Community System (PCS), and making governance structures more effective to ensure accountability and sustainability. By establishing an interconnected and secure digital environment, compliance monitoring and evaluation can become more efficient, transparent, and reliable.

Author Biography

Dr. Respickius Casmir, College of Business Education (CBE), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Supervisor 

Dimensions

Ali, M., Grava, L., & Reaz, M. (2019). Agile regulatory delivery for improved investment competitiveness in Bangladesh. International Finance Corporation.

Andres, E., Vasquez, G., Chen, T., & Shin, A. (2024). Enhancing MSME data interoperability in the APEC region. Enhancing MSME Data Interoperability in the APEC Region, 14, 8.

Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195070705.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195070705.001.0001

Black, J. (2010). Risk-based regulation: Choices, practices and lessons being learnt. In Risk and regulatory policy: Improving the governance of risk (pp. 185-224). OECD.

Bolton, M., & Mintrom, M. (2023). RegTech and creating public value: Opportunities and challenges. Policy Design and Practice, 6(3), 266-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2023.2213059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2023.2213059

Department of Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. (2020). Challenges businesses face when complying with regulation (Report No. 2020/043). UK Government.

Ernst & Young. (2019). Regulatory technology: Navigating the right technology to manage the evolving regulatory environment (p. 11). Ernst & Young LLP.

Esther, F., Alice, W., & Williams, F. (2025). Digital transformation in maritime supply chains: A systematic review of digital information sharing platforms.

European Union. (2017). New European interoperability framework: Promoting seamless services and data flows for European public administrations. https://doi.org/10.2799/78681

Guidi, M., Guardiancich, I., & Levi-Faur, D. (2020). Modes of regulatory governance: A political economy perspective. Governance, 33(1), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12479 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12479

Hatcher-Mbu, B. (2024). Demystifying interoperability: Insights from our work in Ethiopia's agriculture sector.

International Maritime Organization. (2021). Guidelines on maritime cyber risk management (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3) (44[0]), 1-6. https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Security/Pages/Cyber-security.aspx

Jokhadze, N. (2020). Implementation of interoperability of EU information systems in the justice and home affairs domain: Challenges and opportunities.

Kahyarara, G., & Simon, D. (2018). Maritime transport in Africa: Challenges, opportunities, and an agenda for future research. Regional Agreements and Policies on Maritime and the Related Development (September). https://unctad.org/system/files/non-official-document/dtltlbts-AhEM2018d1_Kahyarara_en.pdf

Kirstein, L. (2018). Information sharing for efficient maritime logistics. International Transport Forum Discussion Papers, 57, 36. https://doi.org/10.1787/def963a5-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/def963a5-en

KPMG. (2023). Implementing tech and data-driven compliance (p. 7). KPMG LLP.

Lodge, M. (2015). Trends and challenges in regulation and regulatory policy. In OECD Regulatory Policy Outlook 2015. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264241800-4-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264241800-4-en

Mangalam, S. (2020). Use of new technologies in regulatory delivery (August 2021). The Donor Committee for Enterprise Development. www.enterprise-development.org

Matsuo, A., & Gorgento, R. (2017). The compliance journey: Boosting the value of compliance in a changing regulatory climate. Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler (KPMG).

Murrer, C., & Sainsbury, C. (2020). Governmental use of technology for compliance monitoring and enforcement. Butterworths Journal of International Banking and Financial Law, December, 770-773.

Ndlovu, K., Scott, R. E., & Mars, M. (2021). Interoperability opportunities and challenges in linking mHealth applications and eRecord systems: Botswana as an exemplar. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 21(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01606-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01606-7

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). Regulatory enforcement and inspections. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264208117-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264208117-en

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Data-driven, information-enabled regulatory delivery. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/8f99ec8c-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/8f99ec8c-en

Pan, S., Trentesaux, D., McFarlane, D., Montreuil, B., Ballot, E., & Trentesaux, D. (2023). Digital interoperability in logistics and supply chain management: State-of-the-art and research avenues towards Physical Internet. Computers in Industry, 128, 103435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2021.103435 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2021.103435

President's Office Public Service Management and Good Governance. (2022). Tanzania e-government strategy: Digital government service, anywhere and anytime (Issue 112). https://www.utumishi.go.tz/uploads/documents/e_strategy2022.pdf

REPOA. (2022). Enhancing Tanzania's competitiveness in the logistics value chain (p. 62). REPOA.

Ronoh, H., Omieno, K., & Mutua, S. (2018). An interoperability framework for e-government heterogeneous information systems. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 7(10), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.17148/ijarcce.2018.71025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17148/IJARCCE.2018.71025

Sutinen, J. G., & Kuperan, K. (1999). A socio-economic theory of regulatory compliance. International Journal of Social Economics, 26(1-3), 174-193. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068299910229569 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03068299910229569

TASAC. (2021). Corporate strategic plan (2021/22-2025/26) (p. 44). Tanzania Shipping Agencies Corporation.

The World Bank. (2022). Interoperability towards a data-driven public sector (p. 18). The World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099550101092318102

https://doi.org/10.1596/38520 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/38520

Thomson Reuters. (2019). Tools and best practices for informed compliance (p. 4).

UNCTAD. (2022). Review of maritime transport, 2022 (p. 126). United Nations Publications. http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/rmt2009_en.pdf

Published

2025-10-03

How to Cite

Ngongi, M., & Casmir, R. (2025). Promoting information systems interoperability in enhancing compliance with maritime transport rules and regulations in Tanzania. African Journal of Empirical Research, 6(4), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.6.4.8