Comparative analysis of utilization of birthing position among parturient women in western Kenya

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.6.2.54

Keywords:

Birth Position, Parturient Women, Utilization, Western Kenya

Abstract

Maternal and neonatal outcomes during the second stage of labor depend heavily on the positions women choose to adopt. Despite global and regional evidence supporting the benefits of alternative birthing positions: In Kenyan healthcare facilities the lithotomy position continues to be the main birthing position despite research supporting alternative positions like squatting, kneeling, and side-lying. The persistence of certain birthing positions is primarily caused by a lack of awareness among mothers about alternatives and healthcare systems that fail to endorse non-standard positions. The status of birthing position utilization plays a key role in advancing evidence-based maternal care practices. The research seeks to evaluate differences in birthing position utilization during the second stage of labor across two Kenyan regions, Kakamega and Bungoma. Methodology: A cross-sectional study design was employed. The research study enrolled 481 pregnant women from antenatal clinics located in the two referral hospitals of Kakamega and Bungoma. Researchers used systematic sampling to choose participants and gathered data through structured questionnaires and observational checklists. Data analysis was conducted through descriptive statistics and chi-square tests while maintaining a significance threshold at p < 0.05. Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory provided the framework for this study because it emphasizes how observational learning and self-efficacy combined with environmental factors shape health behavior. Results: The majority of women who gave birth in the Bungoma district did so in the lithotomy position at a rate of 94.6%, compared to 93.3% in Kakamega district. Fifth point three percent of Bungoma participants and six-point seven percent of Kakamega participants had used alternative birthing positions. The chi-square test results indicated no statistically significant difference between the two study areas (χ² = 0.19, p = 0.663), confirming that they were comparable before the intervention. Conclusion: Research results indicate that the lithotomy position remains the predominant choice for women during the second stage of labor in Western Kenya. The research reveals significant gaps in maternal understanding and shows how healthcare system limitations prevent the usage of alternative birthing methods. Recommendation: Healthcare authorities need to update national maternal health resources and personal birth plans to provide information about birthing posture options. Healthcare providers require training while health facilities need proper equipment to accommodate multiple birthing positions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agunda, R. (2022). Utilization of birthing positions among women in public hospitals in Kenya. Kenyatta National Hospital Research Journal, 6(1), 25-34.

Berta, M., Teshome, M., & Desta, H. (2019). Effect of maternal birthing positions on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Ethiopian Journal of Health Development, 33(2), 88-94.

Das, P., & Kaur, H. (2025). Empowering labor: Alternative birth positions and maternal satisfaction. Journal of Obstetrics and Women's Health, 14(2), 57-64.

Edqvist, M., Lindgren, H., Lundgren, I., & Christensson, K. (2018). Midwives' management during the second stage of labor in relation to second-degree tears: A qualitative study in Sweden. Midwifery, 61, 30-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.02.013

Gupta, J. K., Sood, A., Hofmeyr, G. J., & Vogel, J. P. (2017). Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017(5), Art. No.: CD002006. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002006.pub4

Healy, S., Humphreys, E., & Kennedy, C. (2020). Midwives' and obstetricians' perceptions of birthing positions during labour. Midwifery, 83, 102630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102630

Jiregna, S., Fekadu, T., & Mekonnen, H. (2020). Women's perception of birth position in Ethiopia. African Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health, 14(3), 135-142. https://doi.org/10.12968/ajmw.2020.14.3.135

Kibuka, M., Onyango, R., & Mutiso, S. (2021). Alternative birthing positions and outcomes: A Cochrane review. East African Medical Journal, 98(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/142781

Kituku, V. M., Muli, M., & Mutinda, E. (2019). Factors influencing birth position among parturient women in Western Kenya. Journal of Reproductive Health, 11(4), 45-52.

Lin, S. Y., Hu, W. Y., Chang, Y. H., & Lee, W. L. (2018). Effect of ergonomic ankle support aid for squatting position during second stage of labor. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(19-20), 3673-3680. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14533

Mirzakhani, K., Faghihzadeh, S., & Sadeghi, R. (2020). Effects of maternal positions during labor: A systematic review. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 25(3), 185-192. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_209_18

Modi, M., Patel, P., & Desai, P. (2023). Exploring pregnant women's views on upright birthing positions: A cross-sectional study. Asian Journal of Midwifery Research, 6(1), 44-50.

Motanya, M. O., & Iheanacho, T. I. (2023). Alternative birthing practices: Exploring patient autonomy in African settings. Global Journal of Health Research, 15(2), 27-35.

Musie, M., Wanyama, A., & Nalubega, S. (2019). Barriers to use of alternative birthing positions by midwives in Uganda. African Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health, 13(2), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.12968/ajmw.2019.13.2.51

Mutinda, E., Wambua, E., & Kituku, V. (2021). Maternal perspectives on birthing positions in Kenyan hospitals. Kenya Journal of Nursing & Midwifery, 5(2), 33-42.

Nguyen, H. T. (2023). Integrating alternative birth positions into maternity care. Global Health & Innovation Journal, 7(1), 27-36.

Odoemene, C. A., Nwachukwu, O., & Obasi, I. (2020). Awareness and utilization of birthing positions among women in labor. African Journal of Health Sciences, 16(4), 250-257.

Reid, N. G., & Boore, J. R. P. (1991). Research methods and statistics in health care. Edwards Arnold.

Satone, V., & Tayade, S. (2023). Comparative review of birthing positions: Implications for practice. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 144, 104371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104371

WHO. (2021). Recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. World Health Organization https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550215

Yadav, K., Singh, A., & Patel, P. (2021). Alternative maternal positions and labor outcomes. Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 9(1), 14-21.

Zileni, B., Glover, P., & Jones, M. (2021). Women's choice of birthing position in Malawi: Influences and implications. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21(1), 165. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03657-3

Downloads

Published

2025-06-06

How to Cite

Bore, W. C., Kipmerewo, M., Sum, T., & Oronje, S. (2025). Comparative analysis of utilization of birthing position among parturient women in western Kenya. African Journal of Empirical Research, 6(2), 642-648. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.6.2.54