The extent to which e-governance platforms enhance transparency in public sector organisations in Tanzania: Evidence from Benjamini Mkapa Hospital, Dodoma

Thadeus M. Kagumisa; Faisal Issa

doi:10.51867/ajernet.7.3.131

Authors

Thadeus M. Kagumisa Mzumbe University, Tanzania
Professor Faisal Issa Mzumbe University, Tanzania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.7.3.131

Keywords:

e-Governance, Transparency,, Public Sector Organisations, Digital Platforms, Tanzania, Principal–Agent Theory

Abstract

This study assessed the extent to which e-Governance platforms enhance transparency in public sector organisations in Tanzania, drawing on empirical evidence from Benjamini Mkapa Hospital in Dodoma. Guided by the Principal–Agent Theory, the study adopted a mixed-methods approach combining quantitative and qualitative techniques within a cross-sectional survey design. The target population comprised National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) beneficiaries, NHIF employees, information and communication technology (ICT) officers, and e-Governance managers at the hospital. The study population was 1000 people while data were collected from 128 respondents selected through stratified random sampling and administered structured questionnaires, and 15 key informants selected through purposive sampling and engaged through semi-structured interviews. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were employed for data analysis. The findings revealed that e-Governance platforms significantly improved transparency in public sector organisations. Respondents agreed that digital systems enhanced access to public information, improved service delivery quality, and reduced bureaucratic opacity. Specifically, the NHIF online membership verification system, electronic claims processing platform, and digital payment gateway contributed to greater transactional traceability and reduced opportunities for corruption and information manipulation. Key informants further confirmed that digital platforms minimised physical interactions between citizens and public officials, thereby strengthening institutional openness. However, transparency gains were tempered by persistent infrastructure deficiencies, including unstable internet connectivity, limited ICT equipment, and unreliable electricity supply, alongside low digital literacy among some users. The study concludes that e-Governance platforms are effective instruments for advancing transparency in Tanzania's public sector, though their full potential is contingent on sustained investment in digital infrastructure and human capital development. The study recommends that Tanzania government should make investments in ICT infrastructure to all public institutions, especially in rural and peri-urban areas to ensure reliable internet connectivity, stable electricity supply and adequate ICT equipment to enable consistent delivery of e-Governance services.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

African Union. (2020). African Union digital transformation strategy 2020-2030. African Union Commission.

Andersen, T. B. (2009). E-government as an anti-corruption strategy. Information Economics and Policy, 21(3), 201-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.11.003

Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264-271.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001

Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447-468.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x

Cuillier, D., & Piotrowski, S. J. (2009). Internet content regulation and government transparency: Examining the influence of freedom of information laws. Social Science Computer Review, 27(3), 367-384.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.

https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

Digital Skills Gap Index. (2021). Africa digital skills gap report. Wiley.

Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Brookings Institution Press.

Gailmard, S. (2014). Accountability and principal-agent theory. In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641253.013.0016

International Telecommunication Union. (2023). Measuring digital development: ICT Development Index 2023. International Telecommunication Union.

Jaeger, P. T. (2006). Assessing Section 508 compliance on federal e-government Web sites: A multi-method, user-centered evaluation of accessibility for persons with disabilities. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 169-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2006.03.002

Khaile, T. S., Davids, G. J., & Khaile, F. T. (2021). Limitations of the principal-agent theory to explain the problem of non-compliance in South African municipalities. African Journal of Governance and Development, 10(1), 164-177.

Meli, B. M., Rwechungura, H. B., & Mwisila, L. P. (2024). Accountability and transparency of public servants in Tanzania: Reflections on successes and challenges towards socio-economic development. Journal of Accounting and Financial Management, 10(6), 51-64. https://doi.org/10.56201/jafm.v10.no6.2024.pg51.64

Mitchell, R., & Meacheam, D. (2011). Knowledge worker control: Understanding via principal and agency theory. The Learning Organization, 18(2), 149-160.

https://doi.org/10.1108/09696471111103740

National Bureau of Statistics. (2022). Tanzania ICT and digital services survey report. Government of Tanzania.

Ndou, V. (2004). E-government for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 18(1), 1-24.

https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2004.tb00117.x

Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2008). Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(3), 236-263.

https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.15

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Schedler, A. (1999). Conceptualizing accountability. In A. Schedler, L. Diamond, & M. F. Plattner (Eds.), The self-restraining state: Power and accountability in new democracies (pp. 13-28). Lynne Rienner Publishers.

https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685854133

Tanzania e-Government Authority. (2022). Tanzania e-Government strategy 2022-2026. Government of Tanzania.

United Nations. (2022). United Nations e-government survey 2022: The future of digital government. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

United Nations Development Programme. (2023). A shared vision for technology and governance. United Nations Development Programme.

https://doi.org/10.18356/9789213585214

van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & van Deursen, A. J. A. M. (2014). Digital skills: Unlocking the information society. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437037

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

World Bank. (2021). Tanzania-Digital Tanzania Project. World Bank.

Yonazi, J., Sol, H., & Boonstra, A. (2010). Exploring issues underlying citizen adoption of eGovernment initiatives in developing countries: The case of Tanzania. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 38(1), 1-20.