Assessing Learning in Mathematical Sensemaking Electromagnetism Instructions among Rwanda Polytechnic Students at Huye College

https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.5.4.61

Authors

Keywords:

Computer Simulations, EM Instructions, Mathematical Sensemaking, Physical Experimentation

Abstract

In the realm of electromagnetic (EM) courses in engineering, many studies have reported students’ learning difficulties related to mathematical frameworks representing physical phenomena. Students’ learning engagement and learning gains are not satisfying. The present study assessed first-year engineering students’ behavioural engagement and perceived learning gains in mathematical sensemaking electromagnetism instructions at RP-Huye College. Within a single-case research design, a six-weeks intervention incorporating mathematical sensemaking instructions, supported by physical experimentation and computer simulations, was implemented to 61 first-year engineering students who were enrolled in the department of electrical and electronics engineering. All enrolled students were purposively recruited to participate because this target population was less than 100. Data were collected through classroom observations, which used the behavioural engagement related to instruction (BERI) and a post-topic evaluation, which used a semi-structured questionnaire. Data analysis involved the use of graphs, descriptive statistics and inductive thematic analysis. Findings revealed that students were mostly engaged during mathematical sensemaking by hands-on and simulation-based activities, particularly in topics related to electromagnets, where engagement levels peaked at 7.5 in average. Conversely, lecture-based tasks, especially on magnetic forces and electromagnetic induction, recorded the lowest engagement at 6.2 in average. The post-topic assessment on perceived learning gains showed that students had highly positive perceptions on their learning experiences (M=4.82, SD=0.48) and recognized the significance of EM in engineering (M=4.85, SD=0.38). These numerical results were complemented by students’ narrations, which indicated that they gained particular attention about specific EM formulas and how they can apply them in engineering. However, the present study also noted that further refinement in instructional design, particularly by incorporating specific dimensions of mathematical sensemaking, could optimize learning outcomes for EM courses in engineering. Additionally, formal assessments of students’ mastery and experimental studies can benefit future work.

Dimensions

Almudi, J. M., & Ceberio, M. (2015). Analysis of arguments constructed by first-year engineering students addressing electromagnetic induction problems. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(S1), 215-236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9528-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9528-y

Bollen, L., Van Kampen, P., Baily, C., Kelly, M., & De Cock, M. (2017). Student difficulties regarding symbolic and graphical representations of vector fields. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020109

Campos, E., Hernandez, E., Barniol, P., & Zavala, G. (2023). Analysis and comparison of students' conceptual understanding of symmetry arguments in Gauss's and Ampere's laws. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(1), 010103. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.010103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.010103

Cutri, R., Baracat, D., Marim, L., & Witkowski, F. (2015). Active Learning for Physics (Electromagnetism) Teachers in an Engineering Course. 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, 26.147.1-26.147.11. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.23486 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18260/p.23486

Cutri, R., Roberto Marim, L., & Roberto Cardoso, J. (2022). Using project-based learning to teach electromagnetic and wave concepts. The International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education, 59(1), 20-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020720919828990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020720919828990

Espinosa, H. G., James, J., Littman, N., Fickenscher, T., & Thiel, D. V. (2021). An Experiential Learning Approach in Electromagnetics Education. In K. T. Selvan & K. F. Warnick (Eds.), Teaching Electromagnetics (1st ed., pp. 21-47). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003149231-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003149231-3

Galili, I. (2018). Physics and Mathematics as Interwoven Disciplines in Science Education. Science & Education, 27(1-2), 7-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9958-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9958-y

Gaunkar, N. P., & Mina, M. (2018). Improvements in Undergraduate Electromagnetism Courses by Designing Experiences of Inquiry and Reflection. 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 30628. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--30628 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--30628

Gifford, J. D., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2020). Categorical framework for mathematical sense making in physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(2), 020121. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020121

González, J., Martínez, L., Aguas, R., De La Hoz, J., & Sánchez, H. (2023). Redesign and Implementation of the Electromagnetism Course for Engineering Students Using the Backward Design Methodology. Sustainability, 15(16), 12152. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612152

Hakizayezu, J. de D., & Maniraho, J. F. (2022). Challenges Facing Technical and Vocational Education and Training Institutions on Youth Employment in Gasabo District, Rwanda. Journal of Research Innovation and Implications in Education, 6(3), 572-580.

Hashish, A. H., Seyd-Darwish, I., & Tit, N. (2020). Addressing Some Physical Misconceptions in Electrostatics of Freshman Engineering Students. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 8(2), 01-07. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol8.iss2.2161 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol8.iss2.2161

Hoe, P. C., Francis, R., Asykin, A. S., Abdullah, M. A.-A. B., & Ahmad, M. A. B. (2024). Enhancing the Teaching and Learning Process of Faraday's and Lenz's Laws in Electromagnetic Induction using EM-Kit. International Journal of Business Studies and Education, 2(1). https://www.ijbsae.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/10.pdf

Karam, R. (2014). Framing the structural role of mathematics in physics lectures: A case study on electromagnetism. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(1), 010119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010119

Kocakülah, A. (2022). Development and use of a rubric to assess undergraduates' problem solutions in Physics. Participatory Educational Research, 9(3), 362-382. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.71.9.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.71.9.3

Kuo, E., Hull, M. M., Elby, A., & Gupta, A. (2020). Assessing mathematical sensemaking in physics through calculation-concept crossover. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(2), 020109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020109

Lager, I. E., Vandenbosch, G. A. E., & Stumpf, M. (2020). Electromagnetism in the Electrical Engineering Classroom: Dominant trends in teaching classical electromagnetic field theory and innovation vectors. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 62(2), 14-23.

https://doi.org/10.1109/MAP.2020.2969257 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MAP.2020.2969257

Lane, E. S., & Harris, S. E. (2015). A New Tool for Measuring Student Behavioral Engagement in Large University Classes. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(6). https://sei.ubc.ca/bitstream/seima/2073/1/Lane-Harris_Meas-Engagement_JCST2015.pdf

https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst15_044_06_83 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst15_044_06_83

Li, J., & Singh, C. (2018). Investigating and improving introductory physics students' understanding of symmetry and Gauss's law. European Journal of Physics, 39(1), 015702. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/aa8d55 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/aa8d55

Martínez-Mesa, J., González-Chica, D. A., Bastos, J. L., Bonamigo, R. R., & Duquia, R. P. (2014). Sample size: How many participants do I need in my research? Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, 89(4), 609-615. https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20143705 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20143705

Massa, A., Anselmi, N., Dall'Asta, L., Gottardi, G., Goudos, S. K., Hannan, M. A., Huang, J., Li, M., Oliveri, G., Poli, L., Polo, A., Rocca, P., Salas-Sanchez, A. A., Salucci, M., & Yang, S. (2020). Teaching Electromagnetics to Next-Generation Engineers-The ELEDIA Recipe: The ELEDIA teaching style. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 62(2), 50-61. https://doi.org/10.1109/MAP.2020.2970307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MAP.2020.2970307

Ministry of Public Service and Labor. (2019). Revised National Employment Policy. Ministry of Public Service and Labor. https://www.ilo.org/static/english/emplab/download/nep/rwanda/rwanda_national_employment_policy_2019.pdf

Morris, T. H. (2020). Experiential learning - a systematic review and revision of Kolb's model. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(8), 1064-1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1570279 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1570279

Notaroš, B. M., McCullough, R., Manić, S. B., & Maciejewski, A. A. (2019). Computer‐assisted learning of electromagnetics through MATLAB programming of electromagnetic fields in the creativity thread of an integrated approach to electrical engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 27(2), 271-287. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22073

Okey, I. F., & Gladysibibo, C. (2015). Effects of Mathematics Knowledge on Physics Students Performance in Electromagnetism. Journal of Education and Leadership Development, 7(1). https://www.cenresinjournals.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Page-36-49-0222.pdf

Ridder, H.-G. (2017). The theory contribution of case study research designs. Business Research, 10(2), 281-305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-017-0045-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-017-0045-z

Rukundo, D., & Sikubwabo, C. (2021). Contribution of Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) Program in Promoting Employment Opportunities among the Youth in Rwanda: A case of Nyabihu district (Rwanda). Technical and Vocational Education and Employment Opportunities, 10(3). http://voiceofresearch.org/Doc/Dec-2021/Dec-2021_3.pdf

Rwamu, F. (2019). Factors Affecting Practical Skills Acquisition among Technical and Vocational Education Training Learners: A case study of IPRC Kigali [University of Rwanda]. http://dr.ur.ac.rw/bitstream/handle/123456789/614/RWAMU%20THESIS.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Rwanda Polytechnic. (2021). Students' Satisfaction Survey. Rwanda Polytechnic. https://www.rp.ac.rw/index.php?eID=dumpFile&t=f&f=41975&token=470344780fda51d69a01335a872f26aaaa281d85

Samuel, P. (2017). Investigating how Grade 10 Physical Science teachers help learners to make sense of concepts of electromagnetism using easily accessible materials in under-resourced schools [Rhodes University]. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/145037326.pdf

Sirnoorkar, A., Bergeron, P. D. O., & Laverty, J. T. (2023). Sensemaking and scientific modeling: Intertwined processes analyzed in the context of physics problem solving. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(1), 010118. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.010118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.010118

Sözen, E., & Güven, U. (2019). The Effect of Online Assessments on Students' Attitudes Towards Undergraduate-Level Geography Courses. International Education Studies, 12(10), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n10p1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n10p1

Suárez, Á., Marti, A. C., Zuza, K., & Guisasola, J. (2024). Learning difficulties among students when applying Ampére-Maxwell's law and its implications for teaching. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 20(1), 010143. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.010143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.010143

Wilson, M. T., Seshadri, S., Streeter, L. V., & Scott, J. B. (2020). Teaching physics concepts without much mathematics: Ensuring physics is available to students of all backgrounds. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 25(1), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2020.1776027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2020.1776027

Zhao, F., & Schuchardt, A. (2021). Development of the Sci-math Sensemaking Framework: Categorizing sensemaking of mathematical equations in science. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00264-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00264-x

Zuza, K., Almudí, J.-M., Leniz, A., & Guisasola, J. (2014). Addressing students' difficulties with Faraday's law: A guided problem solving approach. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(1), 010122. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010122

Zuza, K., De Cock, M., Van Kampen, P., Bollen, L., & Guisasola, J. (2016). University students' understanding of the electromotive force concept in the context of electromagnetic induction. European Journal of Physics, 37(6), 065709. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/37/6/065709 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/37/6/065709

Published

2024-11-07

How to Cite

Uwayezu, J. C., Kabalisa, J., & Uzabakiriho, V. (2024). Assessing Learning in Mathematical Sensemaking Electromagnetism Instructions among Rwanda Polytechnic Students at Huye College. African Journal of Empirical Research, 5(4), 748–760. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.5.4.61