Effect of Quantity Environmental Reporting Disclosure on Financial Performance of Manufacturing Firms Listed in the Nairobi Securities Exchange





Environmental Reporting Disclosure, Financial Performance, Manufacturing Firms, Nairobi Securities Exchange


Environmental sustainability has become a major pillar of today’s business activities. One of the accounting information goals is to help users predict the returns on their investments. The main purpose of the study was to determine the effects of quantity environmental reporting disclosure on the financial performance of manufacturing firms listed on the Nairobi Securities Exchange. This study employed a survey research design to select manufacturing companies listed on the NSE. The study was carried out on manufacturing companies listed on the Nairobi Securities Exchange (NSE). The target population was 64 respondents. The study employed a census survey to select the 64 respondents including the management and finance heads. The study used questionnaires and a secondary data collection schedule to collect data. Questionnaires captured independent variables, while secondary tools captured dependent variables. Descriptive statistics involved frequencies and percentages, while inferential statistics were based on Pearson correlation and simple linear regression analysis. Tables were used to present data. The findings were that quantity environmental reporting disclosure had a significant effect on financial performance among listed manufacturing firms at NSE (t =9.971, p< 0.05). The study recommended that manufacturing companies should disclose information to enable trust since accountability would easily be achieved through the quantity of information disclosed.


Adams, T. (2014). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.003

Amran, A., Lee, S. P., & Devi, S. S. (2014). The influence of governance structure and strategic corporate social responsibility toward sustainability reporting quality. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(4), 217-235.

https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1767 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1767

Belal, A. R. (2016).Corporate social responsibility reporting in developing countries: The case of Bangladesh. Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315574332 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315574332

Bram, G. J., de Weerd, L. U., Hauck, M., & Huijbregts, M. A. (2016). Determinants of corporate environmental reporting: The importance of environmental performance and assurance. Journal of cleaner production, 129, 724-734.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.039

Cooper, S. (2008). Research methods quantitative and qualitative approaches. Nairobi, Kenya: African Center for Technology Studies.

Crowther, D. (2018). A Social Critique of Corporate Reporting: A Semiotic Analysis of Corporate Financial and Environmental Reporting: A Semiotic Analysis of Corporate Financial and Environmental Reporting. Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315186047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315186047

Dowling, J., & Pfeiffer, J. (2015).Corporate governance, social responsibility information disclosure, and enterprise value in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 1075-1084.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.102

Epstein, M. J. (2018). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental and economic impacts. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351280129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351280129

Fombrun K., & Van Riel, M. (2014) financial factors influencing the quality of corporate social responsibility and environmental management disclosure: A quantile regression approach. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(6), 362-380. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1351

Gibendi, H. (2017). Lean, green and resilient practices influence on supply chain performance: interpretive structural modeling approach. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 12(1), 15-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0409-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0409-7

Guether, R. J. (2017). Environmental impact management of Brazilian companies: Analyzing factors that influence disclosure of waste, emissions, effluents, and other impacts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 148-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.035

Guthrie, G., & Parker, H. (2015).The price of environmental, social and governance practice disclosure: An experiment with professional private equity investors. Journal of Corporate Finance, 30, 168-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.12.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.12.006

Hąbek, P., & Wolniak, R. (2016). Assessing the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: the case of reporting practices in selected European Union member states. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 50(1), 399-420.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0155-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0155-z

Haseldine, K., Zoe, G., & Schlick, C. (2016).The relationship between sustainability performance and sustainability disclosure-Reconciling voluntary disclosure theory and legitimacy theory. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35(5), 455-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2016.06.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2016.06.001

Hrebicek, J., Soukopova, J., Stencl, M., & Trenz, O. (2014).Integration of economic, environmental, social and corporate governance performance and reporting in enterprises. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silvicultura e Mendeliana e Brunensis, 59(7), 157-166.

https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201159070157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201159070157

Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2017). The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35(5), 455-476

Ji, M., Ji, Y., & Dong, S. (2022). Environmental accounting information disclosure driving factors: The case of listed firms in China. Sustainability, 14(23), 15797. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su142315797

https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315797 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315797

Kombo, B., & Tromp, P. (2006). Econometrics of event studies. In Handbook of empirical corporate finance (pp. 3-36). Elsevier.

Kothari, C. R. (2006). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (2nd Edition): New Delhi, India: New Age International (P) Limited.

KPMG, (2017) CSR disclosure: the more things change…?. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(1), 14-35.

https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2013-1549 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2013-1549

Kraft, M & Baraloto, A. (2014). A descriptive analysis of environmental disclosure: A longitudinal study of French companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(2), 233-254.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1698-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1698-y

Kuada, B (2012), Corporate ownership and environmental proactivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(6), 369-389. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1873 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1873

Lu, Y., & Abeysekera, I. (2017). "What Do Stakeholders Care About?" Investigating Corporate Social and Environmental Disclosure in China. Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, 144(1), 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2844-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2844-5

Lys, T., Naughton, J. P., & Wang, C. (2015).Signaling through corporate accountability reporting.Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1), 56-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.03.001

Nairobi Stock Exchnage. (2020) Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2020. Bridiging the gap in the African market.

Navas, L E. (2015). The importance of the complementarity between environmental management systems and environmental innovation capabilities: A firm level approach to environmental and business. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(2), 233-254.

Ngechu, J. (2004). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Analysis. SAGE Publications (4ed).

Post, C., Lai., & Rahma, C. S. (2014). Uncovering the value of green advertising for environmental management practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(2), 117-130.

https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1776 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1776

Qiu, Y., Shaukat, A., & Tharyan, R. (2016). Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance. The British Accounting Review, 48(1), 102-116.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.007

Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2017). Contemporary environmental accounting: issues, concepts and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351282529 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351282529

Sierra-García, L., Zorio-Grima, A., & García-Benau, M. A. (2015). Stakeholder engagement, corporate social responsibility and integrated reporting: An exploratory study. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(5), 286-304.

https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1345

Siew, R. Y. (2015). A review of corporate sustainability reporting tools (SRTs). Journal of environmental management, 164, 180-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.010

Trumpp, C., & Guenther, T. (2017). Too Little or too much? Exploring U-shaped Relationships between Corporate Environmental Performance and Corporate Financial Performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(1), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1900




How to Cite

Ikapel, G. O., Tibbs, C., & Nelima, M. (2023). Effect of Quantity Environmental Reporting Disclosure on Financial Performance of Manufacturing Firms Listed in the Nairobi Securities Exchange. African Journal of Empirical Research, 4(2), 785–795. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.4.2.80