Effects of Virtual Laboratory-Based Instruction on the Frequency of Use of Experiment as a Pedagogical Approach in Teaching and Learning of Physics in Secondary Schools in Kenya





Active learning, Experiments, ICT Integration in Learning, Virtual Laboratory (VL)


Information and communications technology (ICT) incorporation in teaching physics in Kenyan secondary schools cannot be overlooked, given the key roles and benefits that ICT offers in the process of teaching and learning. Consistently poor average scores in the subject currently witnessed at the Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education (KCSE) level in Physics can be attributed to low student motivation and traditional teaching strategies. For instance, in the years 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019, Kisumu County registered low mean scores of 4.23, 4.98, 4.67, and 4.10, respectively, in physics in KCSE. Therefore, there is a need for the incorporation of more effective teaching strategies to improve performance in physics and for students’ interest and attitude in learning the subject to change. Technology-based or enhanced learning leverages all learners, irrespective of their traits or socio-economic status. This study aimed at establishing the effects of virtual laboratory-based instruction (VLBI) on the use of experiments as a pedagogical approach. The study objectives were to establish the effect of virtual laboratories on the frequency of use of experimental teaching approaches in learning physics in secondary schools and to determine the extent of the relationship between physics teachers knowledge of the selected ICT frameworks and the use of virtual experiments in teaching and learning physics in secondary schools in Kenya. The study was supported by behaviourism learning theory and adopted quasi-experimental research designs. The physics teachers were purposefully sampled from each selected school. The sample size was 44 teachers and 358 students, summing up to 402 respondents. The data was analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics. The study concluded that virtual laboratories advance the use of experimental teaching approaches and that there was no statistical significance between the knowledge of the teacher about the selected ICT framework and the use of virtual experiments. The findings of this study would help educational planners successfully design and implement various classroom-based innovations that would enable seamless integration of virtual laboratories into classroom instruction.


Adeyemo, S. A. (2010). Student's ability level and their competence in problem solving task in physics. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 1(2), 35-47.

Altuna, J., & Lareki, A. (2015). Analysis of the Use of Digital Technologies in Schools That Implement Different Learning Theories. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 0 (0) 1-23.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115597869 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115597869

Ambrose, L., & Machek, G. R. (2015). Identifying creatively gifted students: Necessity of a multi-method approach. Contemporary School Psychology, 19, 121-127.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-014-0020-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-014-0020-z

Argaw, A. S., Haile, B. B., Ayalew, B. T., & Kuma, S. G. (2016). The effect of problem based learning (PBL) instruction on students' motivation and problem solving skills of physics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 857-871.

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00647a DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00647a

Bergman, P. (2015). Parent-child information frictions and human capital investment: Evidence from a field experiment.

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2622034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2622034

Bishop, C. M. (1995). Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford university press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001

Blundell, C., Lee, K. T., & Nykvist, S. (2020). Moving beyond enhancing pedagogies with digital technologies: Frames of reference, habits of mind and transformative learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(2), 178-196.

https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1726235 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1726235

Branch, R. M., & Kopcha, T. J. (2014). Instructional design models. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 77-87.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_7

Carter, A. M. (2018). An Eye Toward Change: Examining Requests in Teacher-Student Writing Conferences. Indiana University of Pennsylvania.

Chebii, R. J. (2019). Effects of cooperative e-learning and conventional teaching approaches on secondary school students' achievement and attitude towards chemistry in Koibatek sub-county, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, Egerton University).

Dede, C. (2008). Theoretical perspectives influencing the use of information technology in teaching and learning. International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education, 43-62.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_3

Eddy-U, M. (2015). Motivation for participation or non-participation in group tasks: A dynamic systems model of task-situated willingness to communicate. System,50.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.03.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.03.005

Fink, L. D. (2013). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. John Wiley & Sons.

Gemechu, G. D. (2019). Teachers' Perception and Implementation of Cooperative Learning in the EFL Classroom: The Case of Some Selected Secondary and Preparatory schools of East Shoa Zone of Oromia Regional State (Doctoral dissertation).

Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2002). What is instructional design. Trends and issues in instructional design and technology, 2, 10-16.

Heinrich, G. (2005). Parameter estimation for text analysis (Vol. 1, pp. 1-32). Technical report.

Isa, C. M., Mustaffa, N. K., Joseph, E. O., & Preece, C. N. (2020). Development of Psychomotor Skill and Programme Outcome Attainment of Civil Engineering Students in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Vocational Education And Humanities, 1(2), 9-24.

https://doi.org/10.53797/ajvah.v1i2.2.2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53797/ajvah.v1i2.2.2020

Khan, M. A., Shatalov, M., Maruska, H. P., Wang, H. M., & Kuokstis, E. (2005). III-nitride UV devices. Japanese journal of applied physics, 44(10R), 7191.

https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.44.7191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.44.7191

Khan, S. A., & Faraone, S. V. (2006). The genetics of ADHD: a literature review of 2005. Current Psychiatry Reports, 8(5), 393-397.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-006-0042-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-006-0042-y

Kipyator, A. J. (2017). Assessment of activity student experiment improvisation (ASEI)/plan do see improve (PDSI) instructional approach efficacy in teaching and learning of sciences in public primary schools in Baringo Central Sub County (Doctoral dissertation, Moi University).

Koehler, D. (2016). Understanding deradicalization: Methods, tools and programs for countering violent extremism. Taylor & Francis.

Kothari, C. (2017). Research methodology methods and techniques Published by New Age International (P) Ltd., Publishers, 91.

Kurt, Ö. E., & Şimşek, E. İ. (2017). Evaluation of Mobile Learning with the Eight-Dimensional E-learning framework. In Blended Learning: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1068-1096). IGI Global.

https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0783-3.ch053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0783-3.ch053

Lee, Y. J., Kang, H. M., Lee, E. K., Song, B. M., Jeong, J., Kwon, Y. K., & Lee, H. S. (2014). Novel reassortant influenza A (H5N8) viruses, South Korea, 2014.

https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2006.140233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2006.140233

Majamana, Y., Govender, S., & Maluleke, N. (2019). Resource-based approach for the enhancement of learning physical sciences in grade 12. African Journal of Gender, Society & Development, 8(2), 59.

https://doi.org/10.31920/2050-4284/2019/8n2a4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31920/2050-4284/2019/8n2a4

Mirriahi, N., Alonzo, D., & Fox, B. (2015). A blended learning framework for curriculum design and professional development. Research in Learning Technology, 23.

https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.28451 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.28451

Mulhall, P., & O'Keeffe, D. (2019). Changing attitudes to learning physics through participation in the Victorian Young Physicists' Tournament. Selected works, 32.

Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can 'blended learning'be redeemed?. E-learning and Digital Media, 2(1), 17-26.

https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.17

Owen, E. T., Jin, J., Rossini, D., Fazio, R., & Hartmann, M. J. (2018). Quantum correlations and limit cycles in the driven-dissipative Heisenberg lattice. New Journal of Physics, 20(4), 045004.

https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aab7d3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aab7d3

Patten, B., Sánchez, I. A., & Tangney, B. (2006). Designing collaborative, constructionist and contextual applications for handheld devices. Computers & education, 46(3), 294-308.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.011

Puentedura, E. J., & Louw, A. (2012). A neuroscience approach to managing athletes with low back pain. Physical Therapy in Sport, 13(3), 123-133.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2011.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2011.12.001

Rahayu, A. S. (2018). Engaging the students with styles in EFL perspectives. Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 3(1), 15-29.

https://doi.org/10.22219/celtic.v3i1.7856 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/celtic.v3i1.7856

Semela, T. (2010). Who Is Joining Physics and Why? Factors Influencing the Choice of Physics among Ethiopian University Students. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(3), 319-340.

Siemens, J., Lillo, C., Dumont, R. A., Reynolds, A., Williams, D. S., Gillespie, P. G., & Müller, U. (2004). Cadherin 23 is a component of the tip link in hair-cell stereocilia. Nature, 428(6986), 950-955.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02483 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02483

Sortrakul, T., & Denphaisarn, N. (2009). The evolution of instructional system design model. In The sixth international conference on elearning for knowledge-based society (pp. 17-18).

Telaumbanua, D. (2017). Experimental Method Application In Teaching Physics Education. Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities Vol, 6(4), 84-90.

Yamane, T., & Israel, G. D. (1992). Determining sample size. Program evaluation and organizational development, Florida cooperative extension service. Gainesville (FL): Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida.

Zamani, G., & Rezvani, R. (2015). 'HOTS'in Iran's Official Textbooks: Implications for Material Design and Student Learning. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(5), 138-151.

Zhang, H., Yu, L., Ji, M., Cui, Y., Liu, D., Li, Y., Liu, H., & Wang, Y. (2020). Investigating high school students' perceptions and presences under VR learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(5), 635-655.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1709211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1709211




How to Cite

Okono, E., Wangila, E., & Chebet, A. (2023). Effects of Virtual Laboratory-Based Instruction on the Frequency of Use of Experiment as a Pedagogical Approach in Teaching and Learning of Physics in Secondary Schools in Kenya. African Journal of Empirical Research, 4(2), 1143–1151. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.4.2.116